What sources do Republicans consider legitimate?

[Mr. Shaman]

"They seem to figure if they repeat this often enough, you'll believe it."

- FAUX Noise Mission Statementhttp://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/chris-wallace-falsely-claims-obama-had-filib​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Pretty much anything that isn't a long-winded rant on how stupid and racist the "teabaggers" are.

Too LATE!!!!

March 19, 2013

FAUX Noise; IN THE CROSSHAIRS!​

"It turns out not all conservatives love Fox. Or at least feel it completely serves their needs. A new news network called One America plans to launch this summer and it's aiming to provide more conservative but also more substantive content."

THE REPUBLICAN CIVIL-WAR MOVES TO
CABLE!!!



. . . . . .

*

 

[DiamondDave]

I always hear news being dismissed because of where it comes from. So I'm curious what news is considered legitimate to Republicans?

Lets go with what is not first...

BLOGS
Winger opinion commentary sites (huffo puffo, stink progress, the blaze, etc)
The Onion (even though many lefties still try and post stories from there as fact)
Advocacy groups (NORML, PETA, site for the support of Aleutian Nazi Gay Midgets with Hairlips and HammerToes, etc)
Editorial and Opinion Articles


...

Generally you want a corroborated news story from a major news provider (notice I did not say commentary)... Fox News, CNN, ABC 12 Cleveland, AP, UPI, whatever

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I always hear news being dismissed because of where it comes from. So I'm curious what news is considered legitimate to Republicans?

Generally you want a corroborated news story from a major news provider (notice I did not say commentary)... Fox News, CNN, ABC 12 Cleveland, AP, UPI, whatever

Yeah....right......

FAUX Noise!!!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1qAnx-_LmY]Fox News Babes - YouTube[/ame]​

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Nice to know you're a snotty little dipshit who asks questions to make fun of the answers, not because he actually wants to know. I always prefer it when you people out yourselves quickly, so I don't have to waste time paying attention to you.

I didn't make fun of anyones answers stop playing the victim. I even thanked the guy for being the first to answer straight up...that's sooo unfair.

I'll wait for your answer to the question unless all you got is personal attacks.

Talk about calling the kettle black, but that's so typical, especially after reading your Sara Palin response just prior to your comment above.

Why am I not the least bit surprised


Now in reference to "legit" sources for information, blogs should never be used as Dave previously explained. To have a better understanding, one would first have had the experience of writing a "research" paper for college. Legitimate sources use facts that are not altered, skewed, or molded to fit with the parameters of the websites views or opinions. I like to view sources from the right and left to get an overall projection of the subject: like the New York Times, and Washington Times for example. I also like to use Government Sites, historical quotes or references, United States Supreme Court decisions, just to name a few. You have to be willing to do some real "research", not simply take one man's view or opinions......... and yes, contrary to belief, Bill Maher is definitely out as a legitimate source for information.