What is your pick of the WII Fighters

What is your Favorite WWII Prop Fighter

  • Yakovlev Yak-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yakovlev Yak-9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • IAR 80/IAR 81

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kawanishi N1K/N1K-J

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kawasaki Ki-61

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lavochkin La-5 and La-7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Morane-Saulnier M.S.406

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nakajima Ki-43

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    18

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Oct 22, 2014
22,696
4,627
290
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
Let's have a little fun. You can choose up to 6 choices. Please defend your choices. And this is for the entire WWII from about 1937 to October of 1945. I intentionally left off the ones that were made in low numbers as they really didn't have much of an affect over the war effort one way or the other. Plus, there may not seem to be a limit of what can be listed in here but I found out that limit, ran out of spaces for Aircraft.
 
I picked the ones I did because they were the workhorses..a caveat with the Zero..at the beginning of the war..they were superior..by the end..they had been surpassed.
 
We rolled out the Mustang from the design to in the air in just a few months. The Germans used to sit just out of range of our planes and shoot the hell out of them. Then the Mustang showed up and kept right on chasing them.. Surprise!!
Wonderful plane. Made with American parts, when America was great...
 
I’m not qualified to pick. Only one I recognize by name is the P-51 Mustang.
 
P-51 Mustang was even used in the early years of the Korean War.

Ya forgot the P-38 Lightning.

1418140188897.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
We rolled out the Mustang from the design to in the air in just a few months. The Germans used to sit just out of range of our planes and shoot the hell out of them. Then the Mustang showed up and kept right on chasing them.. Surprise!!
Wonderful plane. Made with American parts, when America was great...

Sort of untrue. Early on, in the daylight, the bombers were supposed to be fortresses and be able to protect themselves. This proved to be wrong. When the daylight bombing was done over France, the P-47 was used for escort duty. When they moved into Germany, the P-38 was used. The problem was, the fighters stayed with the bombers and ended up going into combat at less than 200 mph. Neither the 47 nor the 38 was worth a damned at that slow a speed. The Germans pretty well got a free swipe at the bombers until the Allied Fighters spooled up. Just before the P-51B/C showed up in numbers (early 44), they allowed the fighters to sweep ahead of the bombers and get the fight going before the bombers got there. That doctrine change made a world of difference. Yes, the 51 gets all the credit but the bombing campaign and fighter sweeps were already started done by the P-47 over France and the P-38 over France and Germany. Remember, the first Allied Fighter over Berlin was the P-38 in 1943.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
P-51 Mustang was even used in the early years of the Korean War.

Ya forgot the P-38 Lightning.

1418140188897.jpg

My bad.

Yes, the 51 was used in Korea only because we had nothing else. The great WWII ground attack birds were gone. And they didn't use the newest P-51H either. The nick for the H model was the Mustang Light and couldn't put up with the runways in Japan and Korea. They used the tired P-51Ds from the Guard Units. From all this the A-1 or the AD-4 and 5 were begat. When the AD-4 made it maiden flights off of the carrier and proved it's worth, the F-51 was retired from Korea. The AD-5 was equiv to a P-47 on steroids.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
I picked the ones I did because they were the workhorses..a caveat with the Zero..at the beginning of the war..they were superior..by the end..they had been surpassed.

I have a feeling that we would agree to what was our favorite. Notice, I didn't say the "Best" but the Favorite. I agree, beginning the war, the two planes with the most affect on everything was the Zero and the ME-109. The Favorite would change for me depending on the time frame.
 
The P-51 only ever came into it's own when it was fitted with a British Merlin engine. After that it was spectacular.

I'd vote for the Spitfire as the most consequential aircraft of WW2. At the moment of Germany's greatest strength this aircraft saved England and handed the Germans their first major defeat. This aircraft was the one that carried the day at the exact moment when all could be lost and England faced it's greatest peril.

In the Pacific once the F6F Hellcat showed up the Japanese were lambs to the slaughter. It's predecessor the F4F Wildcat had a 1,300 HP engine and was easy pickings for the Zero the first two years of the war in the Pacific. The Hellcat had a 2,000 horsepower engine and immediately upon deployment on US carriers began sweeping the skies of Zeros and everything else the Japanese had.
 
The P-51 only ever came into it's own when it was fitted with a British Merlin engine. After that it was spectacular.

I'd vote for the Spitfire as the most consequential aircraft of WW2. At the moment of Germany's greatest strength this aircraft saved England and handed the Germans their first major defeat. This aircraft was the one that carried the day at the exact moment when all could be lost and England faced it's greatest peril.

In the Pacific once the F6F Hellcat showed up the Japanese were lambs to the slaughter. It's predecessor the F4F Wildcat had a 1,300 HP engine and was easy pickings for the Zero the first two years of the war in the Pacific. The Hellcat had a 2,000 horsepower engine and immediately upon deployment on US carriers began sweeping the skies of Zeros and everything else the Japanese had.

The P-51B and up only had about a year in the ETO and even less time in PTO. While it did save some Allied pilots lives just by being there it actually made very little difference to the war effort. The war would not have ended up being any longer without it.

During the Battle of Guadalcanal Campaign the P-39s were often bailed out by a F4F screaming in. The F4F got plenty of it's own licks in and there were worse birds out there like the P-39.

And if you look at the number of Luftwaffe Fighters during the BoB, you would see that not only the bulk of the bombers were shot down by the Hurricane but more than half the fighters. As I heard another person say from the Avionics world, during the BoB, the Spitfire was still under development but the Hurricane was a mature weapons system. When the upgraded the Spit, they just cycled the number up. When they finally got the Hurricane upgraded, it was called two different other names; Tempest and Typhoon.
 
The P-51 only ever came into it's own when it was fitted with a British Merlin engine. After that it was spectacular.

I'd vote for the Spitfire as the most consequential aircraft of WW2. At the moment of Germany's greatest strength this aircraft saved England and handed the Germans their first major defeat. This aircraft was the one that carried the day at the exact moment when all could be lost and England faced it's greatest peril.

In the Pacific once the F6F Hellcat showed up the Japanese were lambs to the slaughter. It's predecessor the F4F Wildcat had a 1,300 HP engine and was easy pickings for the Zero the first two years of the war in the Pacific. The Hellcat had a 2,000 horsepower engine and immediately upon deployment on US carriers began sweeping the skies of Zeros and everything else the Japanese had.

The P-51B and up only had about a year in the ETO and even less time in PTO. While it did save some Allied pilots lives just by being there it actually made very little difference to the war effort. The war would not have ended up being any longer without it.

During the Battle of Guadalcanal Campaign the P-39s were often bailed out by a F4F screaming in. The F4F got plenty of it's own licks in and there were worse birds out there like the P-39.

And if you look at the number of Luftwaffe Fighters during the BoB, you would see that not only the bulk of the bombers were shot down by the Hurricane but more than half the fighters. As I heard another person say from the Avionics world, during the BoB, the Spitfire was still under development but the Hurricane was a mature weapons system. When the upgraded the Spit, they just cycled the number up. When they finally got the Hurricane upgraded, it was called two different other names; Tempest and Typhoon.

This forum is ponderous. "Hi we're the contrarians, no matter what you say we'll find the opposite."

Knock yourself out. :coffee:
 
I admire the P-51 but it isn't one of my favorites.

The Spitfire as one of the most beautiful of WW2 fighters- form and function.
The P-47- just because- I have always loved those beasts.
I dither about the F6F and the F4U- but ultimately chose the F6F- just about the perfect carrier fighter of the war.
Finally the Zero- at the beginning of the war it was the perfect carrier fighter.
 
The P-51 only ever came into it's own when it was fitted with a British Merlin engine. After that it was spectacular.

I'd vote for the Spitfire as the most consequential aircraft of WW2. At the moment of Germany's greatest strength this aircraft saved England and handed the Germans their first major defeat. This aircraft was the one that carried the day at the exact moment when all could be lost and England faced it's greatest peril.

In the Pacific once the F6F Hellcat showed up the Japanese were lambs to the slaughter. It's predecessor the F4F Wildcat had a 1,300 HP engine and was easy pickings for the Zero the first two years of the war in the Pacific. The Hellcat had a 2,000 horsepower engine and immediately upon deployment on US carriers began sweeping the skies of Zeros and everything else the Japanese had.

The P-51B and up only had about a year in the ETO and even less time in PTO. While it did save some Allied pilots lives just by being there it actually made very little difference to the war effort. The war would not have ended up being any longer without it.

During the Battle of Guadalcanal Campaign the P-39s were often bailed out by a F4F screaming in. The F4F got plenty of it's own licks in and there were worse birds out there like the P-39.

And if you look at the number of Luftwaffe Fighters during the BoB, you would see that not only the bulk of the bombers were shot down by the Hurricane but more than half the fighters. As I heard another person say from the Avionics world, during the BoB, the Spitfire was still under development but the Hurricane was a mature weapons system. When the upgraded the Spit, they just cycled the number up. When they finally got the Hurricane upgraded, it was called two different other names; Tempest and Typhoon.

This forum is ponderous. "Hi we're the contrarians, no matter what you say we'll find the opposite."

Knock yourself out. :coffee:

Like you should be doing, I am trying to keep history as it really is. Not how some journalist willed it to be. Thank you for your support.
 
I really don't have a favorite. Almost all of the fighters listed were fantastic at one time or another. Some were stopped when someone else occupied their home country, others just got overshadowed by time and technology. But almost each and every one had it's day in the sun.

Favorites are just that. Granted, in the later years of war, the US had the advantage. But the US had the time and resources to get it together better. Think of this, the US bought time for the rest of the allies to put their best foot forward. This includes Britain, USSR and others. Can you imagine if the US had totally ignored Britain and the USSRs? The Brits came out with some really great fighters later on and improved on the Spits. The Russians had enough of a breather to come out with some pretty good fighters later on themselves. After the surrender, even the Italians put out a couple of really good examples.

So, I really don't have a real favorite. I guess I look at the time and conditions.
 
I always loved the P-38 Lightning

Looked futuristic, great range, served multiple roles and served in both theaters for the entire war
It was a workhorse

P-38-Lightning-great-planes-22258000-1200-801.jpg
 
I always loved the P-38 Lightning

Looked futuristic, great range, served multiple roles and served in both theaters for the entire war
It was a workhorse

P-38-Lightning-great-planes-22258000-1200-801.jpg

I somewhat agree. It was NEVER out of the running on anything. While it wasn't the best pure Fighter, it was the best overall fighter. It even transported wounded troops from the front areas to the rear. It even was used to tow gliders during D-Day. IT was the best we had at the start and ended up being one of the best in the end. In between, it had sketchy periods in ETO but pretty well took the fight to where ever it operated at.
 
A case of one agency not communicating with another agency? They built a super strong fast gull wing utility fighter bomber as a carrier plane but the pilots had trouble landing on a carrier because the nose of the Corsair was too long and they couldn't judge their distance from the deck. Oil on the windshield was another problem. They gave the plane to the Marines who used it effectively on land based fields in the Pacific.
 
My favorite WWII fighters were POW's that fought to stay alive and managed to come back home heroes!
 

Forum List

Back
Top