Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The income most people earn wouldn't be possible without the supporting infrastructure, including the government. The idea that one owes nothing in return is not only selfish, it's completely illogical.
Now if you want to discuss HOW MUCH one owes in return and/or WHERE it get's allocated, that is a different debate altogether.
The portion I bolded is a legitimate function of government, because all citizens benefit equally, due to equal access.
What is the justification for forcing anyone to financially provide for anyone else?
It makes liberals feel smug and superior.
But of course you know they're inferior so I guess it's a wash.
So you don't think being driven solely by their emotions makes them inferior?
So you don't think being driven solely by their emotions makes them inferior?
It doesn't make them inferior, just less practical, thus inclined to action that doesn't work long term.
So you don't think being driven solely by their emotions makes them inferior?
It doesn't make them inferior, just less practical, thus inclined to action that doesn't work long term.
Actually having to ask, "So you don't think being driven solely by their emotions makes them inferior?" makes mani-tard inferior.
What a fuckin' idiot he is.
So you don't think being driven solely by their emotions makes them inferior?
It doesn't make them inferior, just less practical, thus inclined to action that doesn't work long term.
Isn't that the definition of inferior?
It doesn't make them inferior, just less practical, thus inclined to action that doesn't work long term.
Isn't that the definition of inferior?
In nature, yes. That's the definition of inferior. We live in a world where we attempt to defy nature and live outside her limitations. We are successful to a certain degree, but nature always wins out eventually.
It doesn't make them inferior, just less practical, thus inclined to action that doesn't work long term.
Isn't that the definition of inferior?
In nature, yes. That's the definition of inferior. We live in a world where we attempt to defy nature and live outside her limitations. We are successful to a certain degree, but nature always wins out eventually.
So you don't think being driven solely by their emotions makes them inferior?
If you're going to have both sides of our conversation, let me know, and I'll leave you to it.Isn't that the definition of inferior?
In nature, yes. That's the definition of inferior. We live in a world where we attempt to defy nature and live outside her limitations. We are successful to a certain degree, but nature always wins out eventually.
So basically, Daveman's lack of balls to admit it notwithstanding, he firmly believes that liberals are inferior.
Thanks for helping me make that clear.
Glenn Beck would get a kick out of this thread.
Isn't that the definition of inferior?
In nature, yes. That's the definition of inferior. We live in a world where we attempt to defy nature and live outside her limitations. We are successful to a certain degree, but nature always wins out eventually.
Interesting---defying nature as a justification for taking from the haves and giving it to the have nots. I agree--nature will win. Isn't defying nature the justification for science too ?
Because you've had the gross misfortune to be born in America rather than in some third world country where you would be permitted to kick the poor to the side of the road to die and rot. That is presuming you would not be among the poor.Are we as a country legislating morality because people are naturally too selfish to voluntarily help each other ?
"Justification?" As in what? Alimony? Child support? Social programs?
Anything. What is the justification for taxing me and using that money to spend on anyone else ?
Why am I forced to provide for those who are deemed unable to provide for themselves ?
What is the justification for forcing anyone to financially provide for anyone else?
It makes liberals feel smug and superior.
Because you've had the gross misfortune to be born in America rather than in some third world country where you would be permitted to kick the poor to the side of the road to die and rot. That is presuming you would not be among the poor."Justification?" As in what? Alimony? Child support? Social programs?
Anything. What is the justification for taxing me and using that money to spend on anyone else ?
Why am I forced to provide for those who are deemed unable to provide for themselves ?
Well my guess would be any social programs where the government is doling out money for nothing. They created a segment of the population that would rather sit on their ass and bleed the system than work at their own personal gain through achievement.Because you've had the gross misfortune to be born in America rather than in some third world country where you would be permitted to kick the poor to the side of the road to die and rot. That is presuming you would not be among the poor.Anything. What is the justification for taxing me and using that money to spend on anyone else ?
Why am I forced to provide for those who are deemed unable to provide for themselves ?
Gotcha----it's a good vs bad thingy. You are good if you allow the government to steal your money if they use it to keep people alive and well. Sorta like religion except they believe you get rewarded for caring for other people voluntarily. How did we get all these people who are unable to take care of themselves ?
( you do understand that even the rich die and rot don't you )