Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
considering tea partiers are just neo cons/dittoheads/conservatives/republicans in disguise etc., the same thing they always do. support corporate america over everyday citizens! defend corporate america's buyout of our government at every turn.
So you got nothing................
I got a nice wife and a loyal dog. you?
It's not IF; it's WHEN. This administration has amply demonstrated the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the tired, failed Marxist dogma that has come to characterize "modern liberalism" (or as they like to style it, "progressivism"). Now, we are going to restore our republic; restore the constitution and the rule of law (not cults of personality) to their rightful place. We are going to put government on a diet, and remind it that government works for the people here, not the people for the government. We are going to dismantle the bureaucracy, reducing it to essential functions, and taking power away from the unaccountable, and put that power back in the hands of the people and their elected representatives. We are going to stop the abuse of the judicial process to obtain by judicial fiat, what cannot be obtained through legislation, and the will of the American people. We are going to have a government that, just like the rest of us, lives within its means, and intrudes as little as possible into the private lives and the pocketbooks of the citizenry it is supposed to serve. In short. we are going to restore the sort of government that reflects the ordinary common sense of the majority of the American people, not the pseudo-intellectual posturing of an impudent corps of effete snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals. Get ready, because there is a new wind blowing, and it it will sweep away the stench of liberal pomposity and arrogance, and replace it with the sweet smell of integrity and common sense!
Show a time in history where the ideas of the right have every worked as they claim?
The Nixon years witnessed the first large-scale integration of public schools in the South. Nixon sought a middle way between the segregationist Wallace and liberal Democrats, whose support of integration was alienating some Southern whites. Hopeful of doing well in the South in 1972, he sought to dispose of desegregation as a political issue before then. Soon after his inauguration, he appointed Vice President Agnew to lead a task force, which worked with local leadersboth white and blackto determine how to integrate local schools. Agnew had little interest in the work, and most of it was done by Labor Secretary George Shultz. Federal aid was available, and a meeting with President Nixon was a possible reward for compliant committees. By September 1970, fewer than ten percent of black children were attending segregated schools. By 1971, however, tensions over desegregation surfaced in Northern cities, with angry protests over the busing of children to schools outside their neighborhood to achieve racial balance. Nixon opposed busing personally but did not subvert court orders requiring its use.
In addition to desegregating public schools, Nixon implemented the Philadelphia Plan in 1970the first significant federal affirmative action program. He also endorsed the Equal Rights Amendment after it passed both houses of Congress in 1972 and went to the states for ratification. Nixon had campaigned as an ERA supporter in 1968, though feminists criticized him for doing little to help the ERA or their cause after his election, though he appointed more women to administration positions than Lyndon Johnson had.
It's not IF; it's WHEN. This administration has amply demonstrated the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the tired, failed Marxist dogma that has come to characterize "modern liberalism" (or as they like to style it, "progressivism"). Now, we are going to restore our republic; restore the constitution and the rule of law (not cults of personality) to their rightful place. We are going to put government on a diet, and remind it that government works for the people here, not the people for the government. We are going to dismantle the bureaucracy, reducing it to essential functions, and taking power away from the unaccountable, and put that power back in the hands of the people and their elected representatives. We are going to stop the abuse of the judicial process to obtain by judicial fiat, what cannot be obtained through legislation, and the will of the American people. We are going to have a government that, just like the rest of us, lives within its means, and intrudes as little as possible into the private lives and the pocketbooks of the citizenry it is supposed to serve. In short. we are going to restore the sort of government that reflects the ordinary common sense of the majority of the American people, not the pseudo-intellectual posturing of an impudent corps of effete snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals. Get ready, because there is a new wind blowing, and it it will sweep away the stench of liberal pomposity and arrogance, and replace it with the sweet smell of integrity and common sense!
It's not IF; it's WHEN. This administration has amply demonstrated the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the tired, failed Marxist dogma that has come to characterize "modern liberalism" (or as they like to style it, "progressivism"). Now, we are going to restore our republic; restore the constitution and the rule of law (not cults of personality) to their rightful place. We are going to put government on a diet, and remind it that government works for the people here, not the people for the government. We are going to dismantle the bureaucracy, reducing it to essential functions, and taking power away from the unaccountable, and put that power back in the hands of the people and their elected representatives. We are going to stop the abuse of the judicial process to obtain by judicial fiat, what cannot be obtained through legislation, and the will of the American people. We are going to have a government that, just like the rest of us, lives within its means, and intrudes as little as possible into the private lives and the pocketbooks of the citizenry it is supposed to serve. In short. we are going to restore the sort of government that reflects the ordinary common sense of the majority of the American people, not the pseudo-intellectual posturing of an impudent corps of effete snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals. Get ready, because there is a new wind blowing, and it it will sweep away the stench of liberal pomposity and arrogance, and replace it with the sweet smell of integrity and common sense!
"marxist dogma"? Prove you're not an ignorant fool. Explain Marxist Dogma (MD) and which policies the Obama Administration modeled on MD.
Also, if you would, explain the "cult of personality" comment and how commuting the sentence of Scotter Libby reflects the rule of law.
Really? Am I mistaken, or was it you the other day telling us how little you have achieved in life? I ask, because that would explain a lot.....It's not IF; it's WHEN. This administration has amply demonstrated the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the tired, failed Marxist dogma that has come to characterize "modern liberalism" (or as they like to style it, "progressivism"). Now, we are going to restore our republic; restore the constitution and the rule of law (not cults of personality) to their rightful place. We are going to put government on a diet, and remind it that government works for the people here, not the people for the government. We are going to dismantle the bureaucracy, reducing it to essential functions, and taking power away from the unaccountable, and put that power back in the hands of the people and their elected representatives. We are going to stop the abuse of the judicial process to obtain by judicial fiat, what cannot be obtained through legislation, and the will of the American people. We are going to have a government that, just like the rest of us, lives within its means, and intrudes as little as possible into the private lives and the pocketbooks of the citizenry it is supposed to serve. In short. we are going to restore the sort of government that reflects the ordinary common sense of the majority of the American people, not the pseudo-intellectual posturing of an impudent corps of effete snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals. Get ready, because there is a new wind blowing, and it it will sweep away the stench of liberal pomposity and arrogance, and replace it with the sweet smell of integrity and common sense!
You may want to reconsider where this thought should be directed, because obviously you are placing blame in the wrong lap.
OMG. not rotten meat. man the lefties-Democrats-Progressives-Commies are coming unglued at the seams..by the way folks, this is a George Soros funded organization.
SNIP:
What If the Tea Party Wins?
They Have a Plan for the Constitution, and It Isnt Pretty
In the Tea Partys America, families must mortgage their home to pay for their mothers end-of-life care. Higher education is a luxury reserved almost exclusively to the very rich. Rotten meat ships to supermarkets nationwide without a national agency to inspect it. Fathers compete with their adolescent children for sub-minimum wage jobs. And our national leaders are utterly powerless to do a thing.
read all of this joke here.
What If the Tea Party Wins?
the tea party already has won, the paroxysm of idiocy as seen here, tells you so.Today many of Richard Nixon's accomplishments would lead to him being characterized as a RINO.
Today's Republicans are reactionaries, they hope to return to the policies and values of the Gilded Age, a time of labor unrest, great disparity between the wealthy and the working man (and Woman), where regulations were nonexistent, children labored six days a week in unheated factories and workers injured on the job were fired and forgotten.
The Tea Party and the Republican Party are no longer separate entities; the TP has moved the former GOP far to the right and even former moderates have been cowed by their rhetoric. Forgotten by many and rewritten by their leadership the history of our nation no longer guides these extremists who have adopted an ideology devoid of compassion, framed by ignorance and fueled by hate and fear and greed.
Asked to explain a comprehensive solution to the myriad problems facing our nation these callous conservatives respond with talking points - believed by them to be immutable truths - and by blaming every Democratic President & Congress of the 20th Century. They are unable to offer a credible, critical analysis of where the policies of their supposed leaders will take our country - and for the most part jump from one false prophet to another more often then they change their socks.
It the problems weren't so serious this entire circus would be hilarious.
Yeah I guess Totalitarianism is just so much easier on the brain than Self Government. No indecision, no hard choices. Just you remember you are always free to agree with Centralized Government and that one size truly fits all. If there is a problem with that, know that the problem's on your end, not Government's, and that you aren't trying hard enough, Comrade.
Your inane (or insane) comment is noted for what it is, an idiotgram. Maybe that's too harsh, maybe you're extremely ignorant or so patisan dishonesty is your only play. In any case your response isn't a counterpoint to anything I posted above.
Supporting Link?Today's Republicans are reactionaries, they hope to return to the policies and values of the Gilded Age, a time of labor unrest, great disparity between the wealthy and the working man (and Woman), where regulations were nonexistent, children labored six days a week in unheated factories and workers injured on the job were fired and forgotten.
Supporting Link?The Tea Party and the Republican Party are no longer separate entities; the TP has moved the former GOP far to the right and even former moderates have been cowed by their rhetoric. Forgotten by many and rewritten by their leadership the history of our nation no longer guides these extremists who have adopted an ideology devoid of compassion, framed by ignorance and fueled by hate and fear and greed.
Supporting Link.Asked to explain a comprehensive solution to the myriad problems facing our nation these callous conservatives respond with talking points - believed by them to be immutable truths - and by blaming every Democratic President & Congress of the 20th Century. They are unable to offer a credible, critical analysis of where the policies of their supposed leaders will take our country - and for the most part jump from one false prophet to another more often then they change their socks.
If your claims weren't so pathetic, and baseless, maybe they could be taken more seriously.It the problems weren't so serious this entire circus would be hilarious.
Your inane (or insane) comment is noted for what it is, an idiotgram. Maybe that's too harsh, maybe you're extremely ignorant or so patisan dishonesty is your only play. In any case your response isn't a counterpoint to anything I posted above.
The Tea Party people will drown at least one cute, cuddly puppy each day. If you have a puppy, or love puppies, or love someone who loves or has a puppy, you need to vote for the Democrats. Do it for the puppies....
This puppy is going to die if you elect the Tea Party!
Oy!What If the Tea Party Wins?
Show a time in history where the ideas of the right have every worked as they claim?
The Nixon years witnessed the first large-scale integration of public schools in the South. Nixon sought a middle way between the segregationist Wallace and liberal Democrats, whose support of integration was alienating some Southern whites. Hopeful of doing well in the South in 1972, he sought to dispose of desegregation as a political issue before then. Soon after his inauguration, he appointed Vice President Agnew to lead a task force, which worked with local leadersboth white and blackto determine how to integrate local schools. Agnew had little interest in the work, and most of it was done by Labor Secretary George Shultz. Federal aid was available, and a meeting with President Nixon was a possible reward for compliant committees. By September 1970, fewer than ten percent of black children were attending segregated schools. By 1971, however, tensions over desegregation surfaced in Northern cities, with angry protests over the busing of children to schools outside their neighborhood to achieve racial balance. Nixon opposed busing personally but did not subvert court orders requiring its use.
In addition to desegregating public schools, Nixon implemented the Philadelphia Plan in 1970the first significant federal affirmative action program. He also endorsed the Equal Rights Amendment after it passed both houses of Congress in 1972 and went to the states for ratification. Nixon had campaigned as an ERA supporter in 1968, though feminists criticized him for doing little to help the ERA or their cause after his election, though he appointed more women to administration positions than Lyndon Johnson had.
Dude that has nothing do do with unfettered markets and Not helping the poor through government.
What If the Tea Party Wins?
In that case, in about 7.5 years we will start hearing how he/she is not really a conservative.
A responsible government that is required to stay within the confines of the Constitution and the law.
Yeah I guess Totalitarianism is just so much easier on the brain than Self Government. No indecision, no hard choices. Just you remember you are always free to agree with Centralized Government and that one size truly fits all. If there is a problem with that, know that the problem's on your end, not Government's, and that you aren't trying hard enough, Comrade.
Your projection is flawed from the start because Das Kapital, in the entirety of its political philosophy -- not merely the implication of the familiar ability vs needs excerpt, encourages full-scale communist control. But Obama has not proposed any critical changes to our existing economic system, which is fundamental capitalism expediently modified by minimal socialist regulations which in no way resemble the communist model.It's not IF; it's WHEN. This administration has amply demonstrated the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the tired, failed Marxist dogma that has come to characterize "modern liberalism" (or as they like to style it, "progressivism"). Now, we are going to restore our republic; restore the constitution and the rule of law (not cults of personality) to their rightful place. We are going to put government on a diet, and remind it that government works for the people here, not the people for the government. We are going to dismantle the bureaucracy, reducing it to essential functions, and taking power away from the unaccountable, and put that power back in the hands of the people and their elected representatives. We are going to stop the abuse of the judicial process to obtain by judicial fiat, what cannot be obtained through legislation, and the will of the American people. We are going to have a government that, just like the rest of us, lives within its means, and intrudes as little as possible into the private lives and the pocketbooks of the citizenry it is supposed to serve. In short. we are going to restore the sort of government that reflects the ordinary common sense of the majority of the American people, not the pseudo-intellectual posturing of an impudent corps of effete snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals. Get ready, because there is a new wind blowing, and it it will sweep away the stench of liberal pomposity and arrogance, and replace it with the sweet smell of integrity and common sense!
"marxist dogma"? Prove you're not an ignorant fool. Explain Marxist Dogma (MD) and which policies the Obama Administration modeled on MD.
Also, if you would, explain the "cult of personality" comment and how commuting the sentence of Scotter Libby reflects the rule of law.
Simple. The redistributionist tax schemes of liberal dems are straight out of "Das Kapital": "From each according to hi ability, to each, according to his needs", remember? Don't you support that? Be careful, because I can find a number of your posts here indicating that you do. Shall I also mention your Dear Leader's friends, mentors and role models, to include one William Ayers (domestic terrorist and unrepentant communist revolutionary), Saul "The Red" Alinsky (avowed communist) , Rev. Jeremiah "God Damn America!" Wright(another communist)? As for a "cult of personality", I give you the thousands of little brainwashed schoolchildren mindlessly singing hymns of praise to Obama, not to mention the youth clad in combat gear chanting Obama cadences-just like the Hitler Jugend, the Young Pioneers, or Mao's Red Guards! I won't even get into the proposal for a civilian defense corps (politicized, naturally, sworn loyal to a man, instead of the constitution). Got the brown shirts and jackboots ready? Stalinist to the core, just like their "New Left" progenitors-no surprise, since the older ones ARE the old members of the New Left of the sixties (dedicated communists, all of them).
And oh, by the way, please explain how Eric Holder's refusal to go after the NBPP for voter intimidation in Philadelphia accords wit the rule of law and the constitution (as opposed to racial bigotry) . (If Eric Holder is not a racist, there's not a single racist in America!)
Don't worry, we're not statist totalitarians like those you favor, and I promise, we are not going be be throwing anyone in the Gulags when we take over.
Your projection is flawed from the start because Das Kapital, in the entirety of its political philosophy -- not merely the implication of the familiar ability vs needs excerpt, encourages full-scale communist control. But Obama has not proposed any critical changes to our existing economic system, which is fundamental capitalism expediently modified by minimal socialist regulations which in no way resemble the communist model."marxist dogma"? Prove you're not an ignorant fool. Explain Marxist Dogma (MD) and which policies the Obama Administration modeled on MD.
Also, if you would, explain the "cult of personality" comment and how commuting the sentence of Scotter Libby reflects the rule of law.
Simple. The redistributionist tax schemes of liberal dems are straight out of "Das Kapital": "From each according to hi ability, to each, according to his needs", remember? Don't you support that? Be careful, because I can find a number of your posts here indicating that you do. Shall I also mention your Dear Leader's friends, mentors and role models, to include one William Ayers (domestic terrorist and unrepentant communist revolutionary), Saul "The Red" Alinsky (avowed communist) , Rev. Jeremiah "God Damn America!" Wright(another communist)? As for a "cult of personality", I give you the thousands of little brainwashed schoolchildren mindlessly singing hymns of praise to Obama, not to mention the youth clad in combat gear chanting Obama cadences-just like the Hitler Jugend, the Young Pioneers, or Mao's Red Guards! I won't even get into the proposal for a civilian defense corps (politicized, naturally, sworn loyal to a man, instead of the constitution). Got the brown shirts and jackboots ready? Stalinist to the core, just like their "New Left" progenitors-no surprise, since the older ones ARE the old members of the New Left of the sixties (dedicated communists, all of them).
And oh, by the way, please explain how Eric Holder's refusal to go after the NBPP for voter intimidation in Philadelphia accords wit the rule of law and the constitution (as opposed to racial bigotry) . (If Eric Holder is not a racist, there's not a single racist in America!)
Don't worry, we're not statist totalitarians like those you favor, and I promise, we are not going be be throwing anyone in the Gulags when we take over.
But I fully agree with your criticism of Eric Holder whose agenda does not conform with the needs of mainstream America. He is a useless wooden indian and he represents one of Obama's most prominent failures.
