Mr Natural
Platinum Member
- Aug 23, 2009
- 23,326
- 11,154
- 950
They've managed to see to it that as much of the wealth of the nation as possible has been concentrated into the hands of the fewest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They've managed to see to it that as much of the wealth of the nation as possible has been concentrated into the hands of the fewest.
Nothing.
oh...sure they did. they spent 70 million dollars investigating a president over a failed land deal and ended up with a blue dress;
took a surplus and ran our economy off of the cliff;
got us into a war of choice in iraq and failed to properly pursue the appropriate targets in afghanistan....
only leader in recorded history to cut taxes during war time;
spent millions of dollars on useless abstinence only education; and
and that's without even starting with terry schiavo and the other rightwingnut lunacy.
Are you really that misinformed or just plain out stupid?
DOn't answer that because we both know the answer is BOTH.
The president was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors", the same bill that Nixon was impeached on. He engaged in behavior that would have gotten any ceo in this country fired (see, Stonecipher, Harry). He was disbarred over the incident. Do you get disbarred for getting a blowjob? Ask one of the lawyers you clean up for.
The Republicans under Newt were responsible for passing the balanced budget. The economyu went off a cliff when Democrats got control of Congress in 06.
Won in Iraq while Obama shows every sign of losing in Afghanistan. How's that war going for ya?
And the federal gov't spends "millions of dollars" on virtually nothing so your criticism is misplaced.
oh...sure they did. they spent 70 million dollars investigating a president over a failed land deal and ended up with a blue dress;
took a surplus and ran our economy off of the cliff;
got us into a war of choice in iraq and failed to properly pursue the appropriate targets in afghanistan....
only leader in recorded history to cut taxes during war time;
spent millions of dollars on useless abstinence only education; and
and that's without even starting with terry schiavo and the other rightwingnut lunacy.
Are you really that misinformed or just plain out stupid?
DOn't answer that because we both know the answer is BOTH.
The president was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors", the same bill that Nixon was impeached on. He engaged in behavior that would have gotten any ceo in this country fired (see, Stonecipher, Harry). He was disbarred over the incident. Do you get disbarred for getting a blowjob? Ask one of the lawyers you clean up for.
The Republicans under Newt were responsible for passing the balanced budget. The economyu went off a cliff when Democrats got control of Congress in 06.
Won in Iraq while Obama shows every sign of losing in Afghanistan. How's that war going for ya?
And the federal gov't spends "millions of dollars" on virtually nothing so your criticism is misplaced.
What was won in Iraq?
oh...sure they did. they spent 70 million dollars investigating a president over a failed land deal and ended up with a blue dress;
took a surplus and ran our economy off of the cliff;
got us into a war of choice in iraq and failed to properly pursue the appropriate targets in afghanistan....
only leader in recorded history to cut taxes during war time;
spent millions of dollars on useless abstinence only education; and
and that's without even starting with terry schiavo and the other rightwingnut lunacy.
Are you really that misinformed or just plain out stupid?
DOn't answer that because we both know the answer is BOTH.
The president was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors", the same bill that Nixon was impeached on. He engaged in behavior that would have gotten any ceo in this country fired (see, Stonecipher, Harry). He was disbarred over the incident. Do you get disbarred for getting a blowjob? Ask one of the lawyers you clean up for.
The Republicans under Newt were responsible for passing the balanced budget. The economyu went off a cliff when Democrats got control of Congress in 06.
Won in Iraq while Obama shows every sign of losing in Afghanistan. How's that war going for ya?
And the federal gov't spends "millions of dollars" on virtually nothing so your criticism is misplaced.
What was won in Iraq?
the repubs under newt could not have accomplished crap without the 1993 budget onmibus reconciliation act, of which not one republican voted for....thank you Democrats of 1993!
Are you really that misinformed or just plain out stupid?
DOn't answer that because we both know the answer is BOTH.
The president was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors", the same bill that Nixon was impeached on. He engaged in behavior that would have gotten any ceo in this country fired (see, Stonecipher, Harry). He was disbarred over the incident. Do you get disbarred for getting a blowjob? Ask one of the lawyers you clean up for.
The Republicans under Newt were responsible for passing the balanced budget. The economyu went off a cliff when Democrats got control of Congress in 06.
Won in Iraq while Obama shows every sign of losing in Afghanistan. How's that war going for ya?
And the federal gov't spends "millions of dollars" on virtually nothing so your criticism is misplaced.
What was won in Iraq?
Um let's see:
Removal of Saddam Hussein. Check
Ending of WMD program. Check
Enforcement of UN resolutions. Check.
Destruction of al Qaeda in Iraq. Check.
Democratic government installed. Check.
Draw down of U.S. forces. Check.
I'd say "Mission Accomplished."
Let's see how Afghanistan, the "good war" is going to stack up.
What has the Republican Party done for this country in the last 20 years?
seems the rabbi is still ducking my response
seems the rabbi is still ducking my response
I'm ignoring you because you're a fucking moron.
The GOP Congress balanced the budget under Clinton. They impeached the bastard as well, making a Democrat the only president to be impeached in this century.
Bush understood that the present situation is a new "war by other means" rather than the police action Clinton wanted to treat it as.
Ditto on the Supreme Court nominees.
Remind us what Democrats have done, other than raising taxes, extending civil rights to terrorists, pissing off our allies, emboldening our enemies, raising taxes and wrecking the economy with new mandates.
Republicans spent 40 million dollars of taxpayer money, endless hours of investigation and
"impeached" Clinton for getting a blowjob. Yea, that really helped the country.
Richard (Watergate) Nixon avoided impeachment. So did Ronald (Iran Contra) Reagan.
Wait a second. Did you say "pissing off our allies"? You know they thought Republicans were more dangerous than North Korea?
This isn't Democrats. This is our allies:
The survey has been carried out by the Guardian in Britain and leading newspapers in Israel (Haaretz), Canada (La Presse and Toronto Star) and Mexico (Reforma), using professional local opinion polling in each country.
It exposes high levels of distrust. In Britain, 69% of those questioned say they believe US policy has made the world less safe since 2001, with only 7% thinking action in Iraq and Afghanistan has increased global security.
The finding is mirrored in America's immediate northern and southern neighbours, Canada and Mexico, with 62% of Canadians and 57% of Mexicans saying the world has become more dangerous because of US policy.
British believe Bush more dangerous than Kim Jong-il | UK news | The Guardian
********************
Gawd,
You guys are dumb. Delusional and dumb. The worst possible combination.
Yeah, and Clinton SHOULD have been impeached. He had the following choice:
Get blowjobs, or Kill Bin Laden. He chose the first one.
Republicans spent 40 million dollars of taxpayer money, endless hours of investigation and
"impeached" Clinton for getting a blowjob. Yea, that really helped the country.
Richard (Watergate) Nixon avoided impeachment. So did Ronald (Iran Contra) Reagan.
Wait a second. Did you say "pissing off our allies"? You know they thought Republicans were more dangerous than North Korea?
This isn't Democrats. This is our allies:
The survey has been carried out by the Guardian in Britain and leading newspapers in Israel (Haaretz), Canada (La Presse and Toronto Star) and Mexico (Reforma), using professional local opinion polling in each country.
It exposes high levels of distrust. In Britain, 69% of those questioned say they believe US policy has made the world less safe since 2001, with only 7% thinking action in Iraq and Afghanistan has increased global security.
The finding is mirrored in America's immediate northern and southern neighbours, Canada and Mexico, with 62% of Canadians and 57% of Mexicans saying the world has become more dangerous because of US policy.
British believe Bush more dangerous than Kim Jong-il | UK news | The Guardian
********************
Gawd,
You guys are dumb. Delusional and dumb. The worst possible combination.
Yeah, and Clinton SHOULD have been impeached. He had the following choice:
Get blowjobs, or Kill Bin Laden. He chose the first one.
Why bother responding to this jackass? He wasn't impeached for getting a beejer... he was impeached for being a liar under oath. But of course, that little bit of info escapes them. And then, to further back up another stupid ass claim, he uses some liberal euro rag as a source.
Are you really that misinformed or just plain out stupid?
DOn't answer that because we both know the answer is BOTH.
The president was impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors", the same bill that Nixon was impeached on. He engaged in behavior that would have gotten any ceo in this country fired (see, Stonecipher, Harry). He was disbarred over the incident. Do you get disbarred for getting a blowjob? Ask one of the lawyers you clean up for.
The Republicans under Newt were responsible for passing the balanced budget. The economyu went off a cliff when Democrats got control of Congress in 06.
Won in Iraq while Obama shows every sign of losing in Afghanistan. How's that war going for ya?
And the federal gov't spends "millions of dollars" on virtually nothing so your criticism is misplaced.
What was won in Iraq?
Um let's see:
Removal of Saddam Hussein. Check
Ending of WMD program. Check
Enforcement of UN resolutions. Check.
Destruction of al Qaeda in Iraq. Check.
Democratic government installed. Check.
Draw down of U.S. forces. Check.
I'd say "Mission Accomplished."
Let's see how Afghanistan, the "good war" is going to stack up.
Republicans spent 40 million dollars of taxpayer money, endless hours of investigation and
"impeached" Clinton for getting a blowjob. Yea, that really helped the country.
Richard (Watergate) Nixon avoided impeachment. So did Ronald (Iran Contra) Reagan.
Wait a second. Did you say "pissing off our allies"? You know they thought Republicans were more dangerous than North Korea?
This isn't Democrats. This is our allies:
The survey has been carried out by the Guardian in Britain and leading newspapers in Israel (Haaretz), Canada (La Presse and Toronto Star) and Mexico (Reforma), using professional local opinion polling in each country.
It exposes high levels of distrust. In Britain, 69% of those questioned say they believe US policy has made the world less safe since 2001, with only 7% thinking action in Iraq and Afghanistan has increased global security.
The finding is mirrored in America's immediate northern and southern neighbours, Canada and Mexico, with 62% of Canadians and 57% of Mexicans saying the world has become more dangerous because of US policy.
British believe Bush more dangerous than Kim Jong-il | UK news | The Guardian
********************
Gawd,
You guys are dumb. Delusional and dumb. The worst possible combination.
Yeah, and Clinton SHOULD have been impeached. He had the following choice:
Get blowjobs, or Kill Bin Laden. He chose the first one.
Why bother responding to this jackass? He wasn't impeached for getting a beejer... he was impeached for being a liar under oath. But of course, that little bit of info escapes them. And then, to further back up another stupid ass claim, he uses some liberal euro rag as a source.
The republican party doesn't "do" anything. It's job is to keep the other side from doing things.
What has the Republican Party done for this country in the last 20 years?