What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano

[blu]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sNWbiAMf80]YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎[/ame]

what a speaker and great mind

 

[Zona]

Greatest thread ever.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Wow! That was well worth the 56 minutes to watch. Thanks for bringing it to us.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Napolitano's Delusions

YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎

what a speaker and great mind

Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

 

[bigrebnc1775]

YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎

what a speaker and great mind

Thanks for sharing.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Napolitano's Delusions

YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎

what a speaker and great mind

Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

Dante you have just been out classed, Napolitano would run circles around your ass and make you look foolish.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Napolitano's Delusions

YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎

what a speaker and great mind

Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

Dante you have just been out classed, Napolitano would run circles around your ass and make you look foolish.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Napolitano's Delusions



Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

Dante you have just been out classed, Napolitano would run circles around your ass and make you look foolish.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

obamanation said we had 57 or 58 states and your point would be?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Dante you have just been out classed, Napolitano would run circles around your ass and make you look foolish.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

obamanation said we had 57 or 58 states and your point would be?

Obama mixed up visits to states with how many states there are. He did so during a grueling and exhaustive campaign.

Nappy, was fresh and on his feet and using deception to make a point.

My point? All the so called 'budding greats' sat there and never did one question the veracity of such a bold faced misstatement of fact.



--

poor attempt at deflection, bringing in Obama's error as a defense of Nappy.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

obamanation said we had 57 or 58 states and your point would be?

Obama mixed up visits to states with how many states there are. He did so during a grueling and exhaustive campaign.

Nappy, was fresh and on his feet and using deception to make a point.

My point? All the so called 'budding greats' sat there and never did one question the veracity of such a bold faced misstatement of fact.



--

poor attempt at deflection, bringing in Obama's error as a defense of Nappy.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

obamanation said we had 57 or 58 states and your point would be?

Obama mixed up visits to states with how many states there are. He did so during a grueling and exhaustive campaign.

Nappy, was fresh and on his feet and using deception to make a point.

My point? All the so called 'budding greats' sat there and never did one question the veracity of such a bold faced misstatement of fact.



--

poor attempt at deflection, bringing in Obama's error as a defense of Nappy.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.

the colonies were part of Great Britain.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Napolitano's Delusions

YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎

what a speaker and great mind

Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

as I was saying...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Napolitano's Delusions

YouTube - ‪What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano‬‎

what a speaker and great mind

Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

as I was saying...

as you were pretending you havn't a clue.
Lets compare the two
He's a former Judge and you are a former Judge?
He has 30 plus years studing the Constitution and you have how many years?
He has degrees in Constitution law and you have?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Napolitano's Delusions



Lew Rockwell?

Giants and budding giants?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

1) Nappy states in colonial America "you had to go to a foreign post office" to buy a stamp with image of king/queen.
. the colonies were part of Great Britain.

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

---

Judge Nappy uses 'democracy and freedom' interchangeably.

3) Quoting Hamilton and others he says "There can be no freedom without government" "As long as the majority rules democracy will be safe"

4) Says Jefferson argued through Madison(?) and Madison himself argue "Our freedom comes from our humanity"

note: 7 minutes into the video
---

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

--

6) "Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

note: approaching the 10 minute mark

as I was saying...

as you were pretending you havn't a clue.
Lets compare the two
He's a former Judge and you are a former Judge?
He has 30 plus years studing the Constitution and you have how many years?
He has degrees in Constitution law and you have?

oh I see. no criticism of the esteemed former judge will do without presenting credentials first?

the Judge's speech/lecture is being criticized, not his resume. get a grip. you look more foolish with each additional attempt here.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

as I was saying...

as you were pretending you havn't a clue.
Lets compare the two
He's a former Judge and you are a former Judge?
He has 30 plus years studing the Constitution and you have how many years?
He has degrees in Constitution law and you have?

oh I see. no criticism of the esteemed former judge will do without presenting credentials first?

the Judge's speech/lecture is being criticized, not his resume. get a grip. you look more foolish with each additional attempt here.

Thats how you liberals play the game.. You can criticize the judge but if you and he dabated on an open forum he would make you look very foolish young man.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I think, to the "colonists" who considered themselves to be Americans, it was a foreign post office by that time.

 

[blu]

Lew Rockwell?

ad hominem?

Andy starts off quoting Sir Thomas Moore. (read a premise of 'natural law') okay.

and?

2) Nappy says "we fought a revolution, we won the revolution, we wrote a constitution"
.sort of. we wrote the articles of confederation first. leaving that fact out skips over some very important history.

what does this have to do with his speech? which do we rule ourselves on now?

5) Nap says if you read Madison's notes and other sources about what went on in the room at Philadelphia "we didn't win all those debates" We?

The Constitution was a compromise document that Madison himself went on to defend against all sides in oder to get it ratified. Nap, is leaving out much and being deceptive in his arguments. Some of his basic premises are flawed right from the start.

WE? We the people of the USA agreed to respect all that was won in all the debates. People like the former Judge(?), try to argue that only some of the Constitutional arguments need be followed and faithfully upheld while others are somehow invalid -- even though 'we' agreed to them all.

the "we" he is referring to is small gov conservatives instead of the big government lovers who had to be accommodated in order to get the constitution passed

"Regrettably there are far too few Ron Paul's in the government." -yep, a Nappy quote

there are too few ron pauls in the government, meaning far too few who are strict constitutionalists and are for small government only