What do normal people, think of the Palestinians?

[Roudy]

Does anybody know the borders of this Palestinian state that never existed in history? Ha ha ha ha.

Sure.

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

It may be a 1956 map but it does show the original partition lines in green, so not that much of a joke.

It is a 1946 map modified in 1956 by including some proposed borders that never became borders. If you look at the legend you can find the symbol for the international boundaries for Palestine.

The 1949 UN Armistice Agreements show that Palestine is still there and its international boundaries remained unchanged.

"Armistice" that means an Arab attack occurred. Those aren't Palestinian lands just areas that savage Arabs chopped off from what Israel was supposed to be. The Arabs did not attack Israel to create this mythical Palestine, just to destroy the Jewish state. Here is the intended division for Israel before the Arab attack.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Does anybody know the borders of this Palestinian state that never existed in history? Ha ha ha ha.

Sure.

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

Tinmore is a professional Hamas paid liar and you are a professional SUCKER.

You are too funny!

 

[Roudy]

Does anybody know the borders of this Palestinian state that never existed in history? Ha ha ha ha.

Sure.

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

Tinmore is a professional Hamas paid liar and you are a professional SUCKER.

You are too funny!

I love it when Tinmore gets caught in one of his lies and has a mental breakdown.

 

[Roudy]

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

 

[P F Tinmore]

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

Link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Does anybody know the borders of this Palestinian state that never existed in history? Ha ha ha ha.

Sure.

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

Tinmore is a professional Hamas paid liar and you are a professional SUCKER.

You are too funny!

I love it when Tinmore gets caught in one of his lies and has a mental breakdown.

OK, start at the first map.

Palestine was not British. Britain merely held Palestine in trust.

 

[Mindful]

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

Link?

Link? Don't try that one. If would be wasted on you.

 

[Roudy]

Sure.

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

Tinmore is a professional Hamas paid liar and you are a professional SUCKER.

You are too funny!

I love it when Tinmore gets caught in one of his lies and has a mental breakdown.

OK, start at the first map.

Palestine was not British. Britain merely held Palestine in trust.

In trust? In trust to whom? Ha ha ha. It was Ottoman territory for 700 years, and conquered by the allies, including Britain and France. Conquerors don't hold anything "in trust".

It wasn't Arab territory, nor did the Ottomans call it "Palestine". It was called "southern Syria" during the Ottoman Empire and it included Lebanon and Jordan. "The Palestinian people" is a hoax.

 

[Roudy]

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

Link?

Link for what idiot? That the British and UN designated the land as the Jewish state? You can't be that stupid. I'm not Rocco for you to play these idiotic word games with.

 

[Challenger]

The mandate gave the land to the Jews....

Point out to me please, where it says that. I'll make it easy for you, here's a transcript Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

 

[Roudy]

The mandate gave the land to the Jews....

Point out to me please, where it says that. I'll make it easy for you, here's a transcript Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

That document collocates with this map, dufus. Same year.

From your document:

"Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people"

Case closed.

 

[Mindful]

Sure.

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

Tinmore is a professional Hamas paid liar and you are a professional SUCKER.

You are too funny!

I love it when Tinmore gets caught in one of his lies and has a mental breakdown.

OK, start at the first map.

Palestine was not British. Britain merely held Palestine in trust.

And what was it before that?

 

[Roudy]

Even this Tinnie was not the land area original plan for the division the Jews were to be given(Given being the operative word here)a smaller amount of land......this map is for 1956.from a survey in 1946...I also note it was drawn up as a proposal ad-hoc committee/commission........The map is a Joke,steve.keep up the fight for justice and peace Tinnie...regards to the family

Tinmore is a professional Hamas paid liar and you are a professional SUCKER.

You are too funny!

I love it when Tinmore gets caught in one of his lies and has a mental breakdown.

OK, start at the first map.

Palestine was not British. Britain merely held Palestine in trust.

And what was it before that?

It wasn't Arab, and it wasn't Palestine either. Ha ha ha.

 

[P F Tinmore]

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

Link?

Link for what idiot? That the British and UN designated the land as the Jewish state? You can't be that stupid. I'm not Rocco for you to play these idiotic word games with.

So you are just blowing smoke and cannot prove what you say?

 

[montelatici]

You post a map drawn by some Ziofascist in 2008, and make absurd claims. Trans Jordan was never intended as Palestine nor was it ever called Arab Palestine as can be discerned from the record in many of the Reports of the Mandaory. For example the 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921 Report. TransJordania is reported on separately and has no relationship with Palestine except for trade, between the two separate entities as confirmed by the British administrators. Stop bullshitting, I leave for a few eeks and you repeat your bullshit and I have to post the source documents that prove you are an ignorant Ziofascist posting propaganda and lies.

"When Palestine west of the Jordan was occupied by the British Army and placed under a British military administration, over Trans-Jordania and a large part of Syria there was established an Arab administration, with its capital at Damascus. The ruler was His Highness the Emir Feisal, the third son of H.M. King Hussein, the King of the Hejaz. When Damascus was occupied by French troops in July, 1920, and the Emir Feisal withdrew, it was necessary to adopt fresh measures in Trans-Jordania. I proceeded to the central town of Salt on August 20th, and, at an assembly of notables and sheikhs of the district, announced that His Majesty's Government favoured the establishment of a system of local self- government, assisted by a small number of British officers as advisers.

Local councils were accordingly formed in the various districts, the people not being ready to unite in any form of combined government for Trans-Jordania as a whole. Five British officers were appointed to assist the councils and their officials and to aid in organising a gendarmerie. No British troops were stationed in the district.

It cannot be claimed that the system of administration so set up was satisfactory. The authority of the councils was flouted by large sections of the population; taxes were collected with difficulty; the funds at the disposal of the local authorities were insufficient to ensure the maintenance of order, still less to defray the cost of roads, schools, hospitals, or other improvements for the benefit of the people.

Some progress was beginning, however, to be made when, in the month of November, H.H. the Emir Abdallah, the second son of King Hussein, arrived from the Hejaz at Ma'an, to the south of Trans-Jordania. His purpose was declared to be to restore a Shereefian government in Damascus. His arrival caused much disturbance in the minds of the people of Trans- Jordania and further impaired the authority, already slight, of the local authorities. From Ma'an the Emir proceeded on March 2nd to Amman, a town on the Hejaz Railway to the east of Salt, and there established his headquarters.

The Secretary of State for the Colonies being in Palestine in the month of March, a Conference was held with the Emir, who came to Jerusalem for the purpose. An arrangement was reached by which the Emir undertook to carry on the administration of Trans-Jordania, under the general direction of the High Commissioner of Palestine, as representing the Mandatory Power, and with the assistance of a small number of British officers, for a period of six months pending a definite settlement. Order and public security were to be maintained and there were to be no attacks against Syria. Since that time a close connection has continued between Palestine and Trans-Jordania. British representatives remain in the principal centres.

I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May. The political and technical officers of the Palestine Administration have made frequent visits to Trans-Jordania and have assisted the local officials with their advice. The difficulties of local finance have continued. Order and security are still lacking. A grant-in-aid of £180,000 was, however, voted by Parliament in July for the assistance of Trans-Jordania, and it is hoped that this assistance will enable an effective reserve force of gendarmerie to be established, revenue to be collected and the government of the district to be placed on a sounder footing. The district possesses great agricultural wealth, and the local revenue, if it were collected, would fully meet the local expenditure.

The political and economic connection between Palestine and Trans-Jordania is very close. Trade is active; communications are constant; disturbance in the one area cannot fail to be of detriment to the other; the prevention of raids from east of the Jordan and the preservation of order there are of no small importance to the population on the west. Syria, too, has a close interest in the security of her southern border. If Trans-Jordania became a prey to anarchy, not only her own inhabitants, but also the neighbouring territories, would be sufferers. All of them look to the Mandatory Power to prevent an eventuality which, in default of her influence and authority, might prove not remote."
- See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

 

[Challenger]

The mandate gave the land to the Jews....

Point out to me please, where it says that. I'll make it easy for you, here's a transcript Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

That document collocates with this map, dufus. Same year.

From your document:

"Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people"

Case closed.

That's not an official map, certainly not part of the Mandate document as it's dated 2008. There is no mention of "Jewish Palestine" or "Trans-Jordan" nor is there any mention of giving Jews exclusive rights to or sovereignty over, any part of the territory. Try again.

 

[Roudy]

You post a map drawn by some Ziofascist in 2008, and make absurd claims. Trans Jordan was never intended as Palestine nor was it ever called Arab Palestine as can be discerned from the record in many of the Reports of the Mandaory. For example the 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921 Report. TransJordania is reported on separately and has no relationship with Palestine except for trade, between the two separate entities as confirmed by the British administrators. Stop bullshitting, I leave for a few eeks and you repeat your bullshit and I have to post the source documents that prove you are an ignorant Ziofascist posting propaganda and lies.

"When Palestine west of the Jordan was occupied by the British Army and placed under a British military administration, over Trans-Jordania and a large part of Syria there was established an Arab administration, with its capital at Damascus. The ruler was His Highness the Emir Feisal, the third son of H.M. King Hussein, the King of the Hejaz. When Damascus was occupied by French troops in July, 1920, and the Emir Feisal withdrew, it was necessary to adopt fresh measures in Trans-Jordania. I proceeded to the central town of Salt on August 20th, and, at an assembly of notables and sheikhs of the district, announced that His Majesty's Government favoured the establishment of a system of local self- government, assisted by a small number of British officers as advisers.

Local councils were accordingly formed in the various districts, the people not being ready to unite in any form of combined government for Trans-Jordania as a whole. Five British officers were appointed to assist the councils and their officials and to aid in organising a gendarmerie. No British troops were stationed in the district.

It cannot be claimed that the system of administration so set up was satisfactory. The authority of the councils was flouted by large sections of the population; taxes were collected with difficulty; the funds at the disposal of the local authorities were insufficient to ensure the maintenance of order, still less to defray the cost of roads, schools, hospitals, or other improvements for the benefit of the people.

Some progress was beginning, however, to be made when, in the month of November, H.H. the Emir Abdallah, the second son of King Hussein, arrived from the Hejaz at Ma'an, to the south of Trans-Jordania. His purpose was declared to be to restore a Shereefian government in Damascus. His arrival caused much disturbance in the minds of the people of Trans- Jordania and further impaired the authority, already slight, of the local authorities. From Ma'an the Emir proceeded on March 2nd to Amman, a town on the Hejaz Railway to the east of Salt, and there established his headquarters.

The Secretary of State for the Colonies being in Palestine in the month of March, a Conference was held with the Emir, who came to Jerusalem for the purpose. An arrangement was reached by which the Emir undertook to carry on the administration of Trans-Jordania, under the general direction of the High Commissioner of Palestine, as representing the Mandatory Power, and with the assistance of a small number of British officers, for a period of six months pending a definite settlement. Order and public security were to be maintained and there were to be no attacks against Syria. Since that time a close connection has continued between Palestine and Trans-Jordania. British representatives remain in the principal centres.

I paid a visit to Amman on April 18th as the guest of the Emir and explained in an address to the sheikhs and notables the arrangement that had been made. The Emir came to Palestine again in the month of May. The political and technical officers of the Palestine Administration have made frequent visits to Trans-Jordania and have assisted the local officials with their advice. The difficulties of local finance have continued. Order and security are still lacking. A grant-in-aid of £180,000 was, however, voted by Parliament in July for the assistance of Trans-Jordania, and it is hoped that this assistance will enable an effective reserve force of gendarmerie to be established, revenue to be collected and the government of the district to be placed on a sounder footing. The district possesses great agricultural wealth, and the local revenue, if it were collected, would fully meet the local expenditure.

The political and economic connection between Palestine and Trans-Jordania is very close. Trade is active; communications are constant; disturbance in the one area cannot fail to be of detriment to the other; the prevention of raids from east of the Jordan and the preservation of order there are of no small importance to the population on the west. Syria, too, has a close interest in the security of her southern border. If Trans-Jordania became a prey to anarchy, not only her own inhabitants, but also the neighbouring territories, would be sufferers. All of them look to the Mandatory Power to prevent an eventuality which, in default of her influence and authority, might prove not remote."
- See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

Buuuuuuullshit!

 

[Roudy]

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

Link?

Link for what idiot? That the British and UN designated the land as the Jewish state? You can't be that stupid. I'm not Rocco for you to play these idiotic word games with.

So you are just blowing smoke and cannot prove what you say?

• In June 2011, Dr. Jaques Gauthier, an international human rights lawyer from Toronto addressed the European Parliament in Brussels on the legal issues regarding Jerusalem and Israel. Referring to the 1922 British Mandate for Palestine and to Article 80 of the UN Charter he said:"For anyone who is interested in justice, these are issues which we have to study carefully ... the rights vested in the Jewish people stand on very solid legal ground and are valid to this day."Under Article 80 and the 1922 Mandate he maintained that Jerusalem cannot be divided and that Jews still have the legal right to settle anywhere in Mandated land.

So since there is no legal ownership of Judea and Samaria, these areas cannot be regarded as "occupied territory". The armistice borders never received international recognition. All of western Palestine, from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, including Gaza and all of Jerusalem (as in Fig.3) remains legally open to Jewish settlement under the orignal British Mandate. International lawyers maintain that this right of settlement is protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter which recognises the Trust (British Mandate) handed to it by the League of Nations.

It appears that the world prefers to 'believe a lie' (2 Thes 2.11) and still cry "occupied territory"!

This is taken out of context. There was a procedure for Jews to enter Palestine.

Jews would be allowed to immigrate.

Jews would be assisted in obtaining Palestinian citizenship.

Jews would be allowed to settle anywhere in Palestine.

Now, did this right apply to Palestinian Jews and foreign national Jews? Other parts of the mandate suggests not.

The mandate gave the land to the Jews. Arabs had no control of that land for 700 years, and it wasn't up to them what happens to it or how it gets divided. Sorry to bust your bubble. If the intolerant savages would have agreed to a Jewish state which was both legal and rightful, we wouldn't be where we are today. But savages will be savages.

Link?

Link for what idiot? That the British and UN designated the land as the Jewish state? You can't be that stupid. I'm not Rocco for you to play these idiotic word games with.

So you are just blowing smoke and cannot prove what you say?

No I'm saying you are a waste of time and bullshit artist who's been proven wrong a million times yet you keep coming back for more.

"Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people"

 

[Mindful]

We KNOW it wasn't British.


Duh

 

[Roudy]

The mandate gave the land to the Jews....

Point out to me please, where it says that. I'll make it easy for you, here's a transcript Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 12 August 1922

That document collocates with this map, dufus. Same year.

From your document:

"Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people"

Case closed.

That's not an official map, certainly not part of the Mandate document as it's dated 2008. There is no mention of "Jewish Palestine" or "Trans-Jordan" nor is there any mention of giving Jews exclusive rights to or sovereignty over, any part of the territory. Try again.

Official map? Official map showed all of Israel and Jordan as land the league intended to give to the Jews. Giving Jordan to the Arabs was a COMPROMISE. And we know how those go with Muslims.