What Country Does Obama Think He's President Of?

Impeached under what charges?

Being a fucking socialist/marxist/commie/whatever left wing label you want to stick on him.

Can you reference the Costitutional clause where grounds for impeachment include "Being a fucking socialist/marxist/commie/whatever left wing label you want to stick on him"

Being a member of another political party is not grounds for impeachment. Of course, it doesn't mean the Republicans won't try

oh it won't be the Republican party trying. It's time for us citizens "to DEMAND IT from BOTH PARTIES.
The man is insane and not fit to hold the office of President of the United States.
 
Last edited:
Congratulations to President Obama.....


Looks like he is on his way to a second straight Nobel Peace Prize

What's a shame is that you and others who think like you do are too stupid to realize that a strong America is what keeps the peace on this planet.

I would say it's even. You guys start just as much shit as you stop....
More. Much much more.
Remember. Saddam was your boy.
Osama was Ronnie Rayguns " heroic freedom fighter".
And then you have a few little things in Latin America
U.S. Interventions in Latin America
 
Obama has signed a treaty today that in all respects handcuffs us and won't allow us to test new nuclear weapons systems. Boy...you could tell the Russians were happy about that.

So let me get this straight....we can't drill, we can't test new weapons systems, we soon won't be able to take heavy payloads into space because he's canceled any new shuttle programs.

What is this guy doing? Does he want us to fall behind everyone else. It seems Obama is trying to turn us into a 3rd rate world power...purposely setting us years back in advancements in science and technology.

Is Obama selling us down the river just so he can justify his Nobel prize?

If I were a competitor of the United States I would be doing cartwheels right now.

Do you live in a cave or are you just that ignorant? That is my question to you.

Maybe after reading this short little outtake from NPR's article about the signing of the new treaty, you will understand how laughable your little 'outrage' looks and why. I'll put the important parts into bold font so it's not too hard for you ...

The two leaders had hoped to have it signed by last December, when the old START treaty expired. There were fits and starts before a final telephone call sealed the deal two weeks ago. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says that in the end patient diplomacy produced a treaty with real results.

"It says to our country, the Cold War really is behind us and these massive nuclear arsenals that both our countries maintained as part of deterrence no longer have to be so big," Clinton said. "We can begin to cut that."

The agreement calls for the United States and Russia to cut their long-range nuclear arsenals by about 30 percent over the next seven years. Clinton says the treaty also follows the old Russian proverb often invoked by President Reagan: Trust but verify.

Get it now? Or will I have to spell it out for you?

You're just embarrassing yourself, suits you right.

U.S. And Russia Sign Nuclear Arms Treaty : NPR
 
Being a fucking socialist/marxist/commie/whatever left wing label you want to stick on him.

Can you reference the Costitutional clause where grounds for impeachment include "Being a fucking socialist/marxist/commie/whatever left wing label you want to stick on him"

Being a member of another political party is not grounds for impeachment. Of course, it doesn't mean the Republicans won't try

oh it won't be the Republican party trying. It's time for us citizens "to DEMAND IT from BOTH PARTIES.
The man is insane and not fit to hold the office of President of the United States.

ROFL. Look people, the hillbilly cave-men woke up from their Bush-era hibernation and are now expressing earnest outrage over things they do not have the brain-capacity nor factual knowledge to understand and analyze.

How entertaining. Cute. Almost heart-warming.

:lol:
 
Why leave out other important information about the treaty?

Russia reserves opt-out of arms treaty with US - Yahoo! News

Russia reserves opt-out of arms treaty with US

AP – Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov speaks to the press in Moscow on Tuesday, April 6, 2010. Lavrov … .By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV, Associated Press Writer Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press Writer – Tue Apr 6, 9:40 am ET

MOSCOW – The new U.S.-Russian arms control treaty is a much better deal for Russia than its predecessor, but Moscow reserves the right to withdraw from it if a planned U.S. missile defense system grows into a threat, Russia's foreign minister said Tuesday.

Sergey Lavrov said Russia will issue a statement outlining the terms for such a withdrawal after President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev sign the treaty Thursday in Prague. The new accord replaces the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START I, which expired in December.

Lavrov has said before that Russia could withdraw from the treaty. But his comments at a briefing Tuesday were his most specific yet on how and why a withdrawal could occur.

"Russia will have the right to opt out of the treaty if ... the U.S. strategic missile defense begins to significantly affect the efficiency of Russian strategic nuclear forces," he said.
 
The Obama should be IMPEACHED, the sooner the better.

He is a danger to us and our country.

Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.
 
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God."

Making the world just a tad bit safer should be praised as the goal for America and the world. His actions are consistent with the basic American premise that we only war when it is necessary, not as the draft dodgers Bush Cheney did when they were afraid.


"How blessed are those who make peace, because it is they who will be called God's children!"

Matthew 5:9

The Bible clearly states that strife and conflict will always be a part of this world due to sin. Meditate on that.

When one side concedes more than the other, they lose. Hopefully the Senate has more sense and rejects this treaty.
 
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God."

Making the world just a tad bit safer should be praised as the goal for America and the world. His actions are consistent with the basic American premise that we only war when it is necessary, not as the draft dodgers Bush Cheney did when they were afraid.


"How blessed are those who make peace, because it is they who will be called God's children!"

Matthew 5:9

The Bible clearly states that strife and conflict will always be a part of this world due to sin. Meditate on that.

When one side concedes more than the other, they lose. Hopefully the Senate has more sense and rejects this treaty.

I would hope for the same thing. Sadly there are too many senators that have had wet dreams for years just thinking about this day.

Instead we will get a democrat circle jerk with John Kerry as pivot man.
 
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God."

Making the world just a tad bit safer should be praised as the goal for America and the world. His actions are consistent with the basic American premise that we only war when it is necessary, not as the draft dodgers Bush Cheney did when they were afraid.


"How blessed are those who make peace, because it is they who will be called God's children!"

Matthew 5:9

The Bible clearly states that strife and conflict will always be a part of this world due to sin. Meditate on that.

When one side concedes more than the other, they lose. Hopefully the Senate has more sense and rejects this treaty.
"I come not to bring peace, but to bring a Sword" (Matthew 10:34).

I'm not a neo-con warmonger my self (I am anti-war in most cases), but midcan's verse is used incorrectly. And the verse I used can rebut it in terms of context application.
 
The Obama should be IMPEACHED, the sooner the better.

He is a danger to us and our country.

Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.

I think this whole impeachment crap shows how cavalier the Republicans are in determining "High Crimes and misdemeaners"

It is clearly evident, that if they were ever to regain control of the House or Senate that the Republicans would act just like they did in the 90's. They would tie up the presidency with one unsubstantiated investigation after another and once again gridlock the government.
 
The Obama should be IMPEACHED, the sooner the better.

He is a danger to us and our country.

Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.

I think this whole impeachment crap shows how cavalier the Republicans are in determining "High Crimes and misdemeaners"

It is clearly evident, that if they were ever to regain control of the House or Senate that the Republicans would act just like they did in the 90's. They would tie up the presidency with one unsubstantiated investigation after another and once again gridlock the government.

Gridlock is preferable to a headlong rush into socialism. It also is better than bad treaties, further slipping into deficit and more wealth redistribution.
 
The Obama should be IMPEACHED, the sooner the better.

He is a danger to us and our country.

Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.

I think this whole impeachment crap shows how cavalier the Republicans are in determining "High Crimes and misdemeaners"

It is clearly evident, that if they were ever to regain control of the House or Senate that the Republicans would act just like they did in the 90's. They would tie up the presidency with one unsubstantiated investigation after another and once again gridlock the government.

Why not? Like Democrats aren't acting in the same manner now that got them the boot in the 90s?

Get over yourself, knucklehead.
 
The Obama should be IMPEACHED, the sooner the better.

He is a danger to us and our country.

Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.

I think this whole impeachment crap shows how cavalier the Republicans are in determining "High Crimes and misdemeaners"

It is clearly evident, that if they were ever to regain control of the House or Senate that the Republicans would act just like they did in the 90's. They would tie up the presidency with one unsubstantiated investigation after another and once again gridlock the government.

oh right, just awhile go you were CONGRATUALING the Obama for this, now it's "no big deal.
as for the rest of you post, with your crystal ball could you tell me if I am going to win the lotto next week?
 
Last edited:
The Obama should be IMPEACHED, the sooner the better.

He is a danger to us and our country.

Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.

I think this whole impeachment crap shows how cavalier the Republicans are in determining "High Crimes and misdemeaners"

It is clearly evident, that if they were ever to regain control of the House or Senate that the Republicans would act just like they did in the 90's. They would tie up the presidency with one unsubstantiated investigation after another and once again gridlock the government.
We haven't had some of that in a while. Bring on the gridlock!
 
Try not to be too stupid here. One, who would impeach him, your Rs lost a couple of elections and aren't in any position to say who gets impeached.

Two, this agreement wasn't even that big a deal, unfortunately, there will still be nuclear weapons, you all are just sitting around fear mongering once again.

I think this whole impeachment crap shows how cavalier the Republicans are in determining "High Crimes and misdemeaners"

It is clearly evident, that if they were ever to regain control of the House or Senate that the Republicans would act just like they did in the 90's. They would tie up the presidency with one unsubstantiated investigation after another and once again gridlock the government.

oh right, just awhile go you were CONGRATUALING the Obama for this, now it's "no big deal.
as for the rest of you post, with your crystal ball could you tell me if I am going to win the lotto next week?

If the Republicans were ever to regain control in Congress (and thats a big IF), I would give them about six weeks before they named a special prosecutor to tie up the president under some trumped up charges. That is how long it took them to go after Clinton

Will the GOP name a special prosecutor for birth certificates?
 
So, from the OP and subsequent responses I gather you guys must have really hated Ronald Reagan, who was the creator of the first START treaty, right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top