Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
I noticed you didn't address the rebuttal to your original lie that it was the Democrats holding up the bill, and latched on to something that is subjective so you can denigrate it. But you are of course wrong there too.
It's Official: Obama Is Creaming Bush When It Comes To Jobs - Business Insider
I can only hope the Republican gamble to do anything to stop the President, give him a Waterloo moment so to speak, from getting re-elected fails and the voter turn the house back over to the Democrats.
I figured you were kidding about the Dems holding up the bill because it was so well known. Here's the link:
Obama Campaign Says GOP Blocking Jobs Bill--After Reid Blocks Jobs Bill | The Weekly Standard
And your article was a joke. Comparing Bush's worst month in the onset of a recession to Obama's whole term is an absurd argument only a moron would believe.
Psssss, today is October 18th, not the 4th.
Again you're caught in lie, The chart in the article I posted shows over two years split between the two Preisdents. 13 months of each, not President Bushes worst month to President Obama nearly three years. Care to revise your statement?
yo..
You can cite all of the graphs and charts you want.
Bottom line....
Unemployment is at 9.1%...and that does not include the underemnployed or those that have given up.
So do yourself a favor...stop looking for ways to ignore thwe bottom line and start realizing that unemployment is at 9.1%..
FYI....you need to read the fine print of your charts and graphs.....
And before you ask me why...let me put it to you this way....
According to the CBO report....3.6 million jobs were created....yet unempl;oyment didnt budge.
Seems to me they forgot to mentiuon that 3.6 million jhobs were also LOST during that span.
Or does it make you happy to know that a tremporary job was created for one man (at a cost to the taxpayer) while a permanent job for another man is lost.