Wedded: Energy and Capitalism

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. Begin with 'The Keystone Pipeline': proof that another principle of which Obama is oblivious is that energy is the force behind economic growth.
Or, perhaps, because he does understand that producing energy has attracted many of the greatest entrepreneurs and inventors in the nation's history.
Yes, that inclination would fit his profile, wouldn't it.

a. As an enemy of free markets, Obama would put the clamps on any capitalist advent that increased prosperity....prosperity would, after all, decrease the rolls of citizens lining up for big government handouts.

b. Never forget: entrepreneurs get your money by providing goods and services which you see as worth the cost, it occurs by way of a voluntary transfer of money. Government, on the other hand, uses force to get your funds, or, a similarity: a monopoly.




2. Early on, it was wood that served as the source of energy. This was replaced with coal in early1800s. Even today we have hundreds of years supply of coal....of course, Obama has recently put a stake in that.
But then oil came along, as kerosene to light homes, and then as gasoline for that new invention, the automobile.

3. Enter the greatest entrepreneur in US history: John D. Rockefeller.
For government school grads, trained to hate the rich,....well, so much for critical thinking. Hey...,know how they became rich? See 1b above. This was the genius of Rockefeller: he figured out how to refine oil so that he could light American's homes for about one cent per hour. That was Standard Oil: good news for whales! This made him the first billionaire in American history.

a. Still hate him, Leftists? He wrote to one of his partners in 1885: "...we are refining oil for the poor man and he must have it cheap and good."
John D. Rockefeller and the Oil Industry : The Freeman : Foundation for Economic Education





4. But...but...but he ruined the land and polluted the air!!!
Actually, he was probably the first environmentalist in our history, because of his desire to be profitable and efficient. When he first came into the oil industry, others were spilling as much as they captured; it went into the land and the rivers. Rockefeller worked tirelessly to cut waste, and this meant stopping the spills. First, he cut the loss of oil, and his R & D discovered over 300 by-products he could sell.

a. "To talented entrepreneurs, waste is an abhorrent loss of raw materials. Rockefeller, for example, spent an entire day trying to seal cans of his Standard oil with 39 drops of solder instead of the usual forty (he succeeded)....Henry Dow took Michigan brine that others threw away and used it to make valuable bromine and challenged the German [monopoly]. The Wright brothers wanted the lightest, most economical materials....James J. Hill built his Great Northern Railway straighter and with flatter grade than any other transcontinental."
Folsom, "Uncle Sam Can 't Count," p. 166.




5. By the 1960s, the most advanced nations had switched from coal to oil, and the abundance meant competition, discounts, and choices.
See "The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power," by Daniel Yergin

6. So why did oil prices go from $4/barrel in 1973, to over $32/barrel less than a decade later?

Government.

Whether oil, or natural gas, or coal...and nuclear....federal laws killed the incentive to extract and sell them. The laws were of two kinds: environmental laws, and laws that fixed the price of energy.




7. Nixon. In trying to cut inflation off at the pass, he instituted price controls in 1971. That's politics, not economics.

So....when he fixed the price of home heating oil, what would be the impetus for refiners to find and supply the increased demand??? By the winter of 1972-1973, the supplies of heating oil were almost exhausted. In '73, once he was reelected, prices were allowed to rise 8%.

a. Ooops! March 6, 1973, the Cost of Living Council reinstated price controls! BTW....only on the 24 largest suppliers....the rest could charge what they wanted.
"Nixon's Economy : Booms, Busts, Dollars, and Votes," by Allen J. Matusow, p.249-250
 
8. Now, if you have been trained to see "Big Oil" as the bête noire, well, pick your appellation:
socialist, communist, Liberal, Progressive, Democrat, eco-fascist, government school grad, whatever.....

It may be too late for you, but, let's set the record straight.


a. If you had to pick an industry based on profit.....oil isn't the best choice. “...let’s compare the profit margin of Big Oil to that of Microsoft, Apple, Google, Johnson & Johnson, Coca-Cola, Nike, etc. The average profit margin for companies in the S & P 500 index was 13 cents. And “The [Oil] industry’s net profit per dollar of revenue was just under 9 cents, compared to… the S&P 500, meaning the “markup” for the oil and gas industry is below average.”
AAPL Key Statistics | Apple Inc. Stock - Yahoo! Finance, available for each company.

So, where are the complaints about ‘Big Sneaker,’ or ‘Big Shampoo’?



b. You know all those names you've been taught to call the oil guys....tycoons, oligarchs, oppressors.....Wrong.

“Exxon Mobil, in fact, is owned mostly by ordinary Americans. Mutual funds, index funds and pension funds (including union pension funds) own about 52 percent of Exxon Mobil’s shares. Individual shareholders, about two million or so, own almost all the rest. The pooh-bahs who run Exxon own less than 1 percent of the company.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/business/02every.html



c. And, of course, the antibusiness crowd loves stories about how much Big Oil is stealing from the American people! On the contrary, in 2006, the oil industry paid $81 billion in income tax, and while Exxon’s earnings increased 89% from 2003 to 2007, their income taxes increased 170%. Businessweek - Business News, Stock market & Financial Advice



d. " Taxation Hero: ExxonMobil Pays $3 In Taxes For Every $1 In Profit" Taxation Hero: ExxonMobil Pays $3 In Taxes For Every $1 In Profit - Forbes
 
9. Figured out how you've been hoodwinked by politicians?

a. While Exxon Mobil squeezes a couple of pennies out of each gallon of gas, the U.S. government does a bit better. The government rakes in somewhere between 40-60 cents in taxes from each gallon of gas. And since the government spends ZERO dollars to sell that gasoline, their profit margin is 100%.


b. From 2006-2010, Exxon earned $40.5 billion in the US
From 2006-2010, Exxon paid $59.5 billion in US taxes.
Exxon Earns Huge Profits, But Also Pays Huge Taxes | TheBlaze.com




10. There are about 138 million tax filers in the United States of America, about half of whom pay any federal income tax.
How many tax payers are in America

That means if we divide Exxon’s taxes by the 69 million who pay taxes, each is subsidized by $1,681.
Read more: How many tax payers are in America

Say 'Thank you, Exxon.'





11. Did you get the joke yet? Here are some of the ones playing the joke:

Leahy: “how can you [executives] justify such exorbitant profit on the backs of the middle-class and hard-working families?”

Markey: “On April’s Fool’s Day, the biggest joke of all is being played on American families by Big Oil.”

Boxer: “Working people struggle with high gas prices and your sacrifice, gentleman [executive] appears to be nothing.”

Durbin: “Oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy.”




So.....do you think they're stupid.....?

....or do they think you're stupid?
 
12. I know....I know.....you want to save the planet, 'cause all that oil spill damage.....
..after all, you're a good little conservationist....



a. And then there’s President Bush’s plan to open hundreds of millions of acres off US coasts. DOI estimates run 18 billion barrels of oil and 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas… but President Obama put that on hold.
White House puts coastal drilling plans on hold - SFGate


b. Good thing he did, eh? What about all the oil that would be spilled in the oceans?

But......
“During the past two decades, while U.S. oil imports and consumption have steadily risen, oil spill incidents and the volume of oil spilled have not followed a similar course. In general, the annual number and volume of oil spills have shown declines—in some cases, dramatic declines.”




And isn't this interesting.....

"And 62% of all oil spillage is natural seepage from the earth itself, and only 1% of oil in coastal waters is due to oil extraction.
http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL33705_20090827.pdf(Source: Prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) with data from the National Research Council
(NRC) of the National Academies of Science, 2003, Oil in the Sea III: Inputs, Fates, and Effects, p. 69.)




Amazing how different the world looks when you actually know stuff, huh?
 
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.

Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


water-strider-1.jpg
 
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.

Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


View attachment 31800




"... profit motives ..."

Hoorah for "... profit motives ..."!!!


It is what ended feudalism and produced the middle class!!!

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



Only Marxist simpletons believe otherwise.
 
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.

Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


View attachment 31800




"... profit motives ..."

Hoorah for "... profit motives ..."!!!


It is what ended feudalism and produced the middle class!!!

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



Only Marxist simpletons believe otherwise.
The follow-up question in any comparative econ class, or other, would be: was Marx wrong, if so where, if not what changed?
 
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.

Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


View attachment 31800




"... profit motives ..."

Hoorah for "... profit motives ..."!!!


It is what ended feudalism and produced the middle class!!!

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



Only Marxist simpletons believe otherwise.
The follow-up question in any comparative econ class, or other, would be: was Marx wrong, if so where, if not what changed?




So THAT'S why the Roosevelt/Stalin marriage is your fav!
 
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.

Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


View attachment 31800




"... profit motives ..."

Hoorah for "... profit motives ..."!!!


It is what ended feudalism and produced the middle class!!!

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



Only Marxist simpletons believe otherwise.
The follow-up question in any comparative econ class, or other, would be: was Marx wrong, if so where, if not
what changed?





So THAT'S why the Roosevelt/Stalin marriage is your fav!
The Capital Colloid

There needs to be more talk about the relationship between population change and energy profit motives or capital movement. Why is there so much demand for energy extraction? How is this demand related to the movement of peoples?

The enormous motion of peoples across the globe since the days of exploration, migration, colonialism through to today’s free market globalization creates a grid of population dynamics analysis. How has the movement of people affected population growth and rates? How has the democratization of Hong Kong affected policies regarding negotiations?

This arena is really like a motility colloid. We can examine the appearance and durability of this colloid under stress. How would this ‘colloid’ change under conditions of cataclysm (i.e., plague, natural disasters, etc.), and how does civilization manage preparation and rescue procedures (i.e., Red Cross)?

Population management is the new name of sociological analysis in our world of Burger King (consumerism access culture) globalization.

Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


View attachment 31800




"... profit motives ..."

Hoorah for "... profit motives ..."!!!


It is what ended feudalism and produced the middle class!!!

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



Only Marxist simpletons believe otherwise.
The follow-up question in any comparative econ class, or other, would be: was Marx wrong, if so where, if not what changed?




So THAT'S why the Roosevelt/Stalin marriage is your fav!


Such talk reveals the true demand for social art totems such as the migration-polaroid Hollywood (USA) movie “Coming to America” (1988).

Beware of the seductive and poisonous jellyfish (i.e., the capitalism warlock). The good news is that BP (British Petroleum) is investing in biomass fuels research.




:afro:

BP - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


View attachment 31800




"... profit motives ..."

Hoorah for "... profit motives ..."!!!


It is what ended feudalism and produced the middle class!!!

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



Only Marxist simpletons believe otherwise.
The follow-up question in any comparative econ class, or other, would be: was Marx wrong, if so where, if not what changed?




So THAT'S why the Roosevelt/Stalin marriage is your fav!


The question has nothing to do with marriage but with economics. It's a simple question: was Marx wrong or did things change? If changed, what changed and why?
 
was Marx wrong or did things change? If changed, what changed and why?

yes Marx was wrong and responsible for the slow deaths of about 150 million human beings. Liberals could not have found a more evil wagon to which to hook their horse thus insuring that the evil of Hitler Stalin Mao lives on and on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top