We Won't Tolerate Violence?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Big D, Jul 15, 2004.

  1. Big D
    Offline

    Big D Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    The recent beating of a white township resident by a group of six black teenagers is considered a bias crime, police told a group of more than 200 residents who gathered at a local church last night to express their support for the victim and their concern about violent acts in the area in the past three weeks.

    Coulton said the attack and three other crimes in the area in recent weeks do not seem to be related.

    "As of right now, the case is initially being considered a bias crime," Coulton said. "Once the investigation is completed, the prosecutor's office will consider whether that is appropriate given the results of the investigation."

    Dombroski was walking his dog in his neighborhood when five or six black males wearing hooded sweat shirts approached him, he told police.

    He said one asked him if his dog bites and when he said no, the group attacked him. He said he was punched in the face and knocked to the ground, then was kicked and punched.

    A neighbor who heard the commotion began yelling and called the police. The attackers fled. They did not steal anything from Dombroski, whose dog ran home during the attack.

    -- -- -- The week before the beating, a 22-year-old township woman and her boyfriend were carjacked by four armed men at Moody Park.

    The carjackers, one wielding a sawed-off shotgun, drove them to a bank parking lot, then to a darkened street where they beat the man, police said. The four attackers were described as young black men, police said.

    Four days after Dombroski was attacked, four black men followed a 20-year-old student on the campus of The College of New Jersey and tried to rip off her clothes, Coulton said.

    The next evening at Somerset Park, a 14-year-old who was playing basketball was allegedly attacked by a group of about 10 or 12 black teenagers who came out of the woods. The teenagers allegedly made racial slurs before they kicked him, police said. That event is also being considered a bias crime, Coulton said.

    "So far we have no evidence that any of the incidents are at all related," Coulton said. Police said it appears to be a coincidence that the events have happened in the same area in this short period of time.

    "What were a bunch of black kids doing walking around with hoods on July 3 when it was almost 100 degrees outside?" asked resident Jerry Ball, who is black. "They should have been stopped by the police."

    http://www.nj.com/news/times/index.ssf?/base/news-2/108988059369911.xml
     
  2. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    since the victim is white, it is called a "bias" crime but if he was black, it would be called a "hate" crime? What gives here?
     
  3. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    I feel for ya, but until the black community stops bitching about "profiling" it ain't gonna happen. You can't have your cake and eat it too!
     
  4. Big D
    Offline

    Big D Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    That quote is from the article and not from me.
    You are right though about these "bias" crimes, what a joke if the races were reversed this news would have stopped the war in Iraq.
     
  5. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    The FBI is getting right on this.

    Oh, wait.

    No, they're not. It's open season on white people, and the blacks know it. Blacks no NOTHING will happen to them if they physically attack white people. NOTHING. NOTHING. NOTHING. They additionally know that whites themselves will do nothing about it. They can't, really. Who cares? The media? The government? Right. If a white tried to defend himself, how would it be reported? That HE was the aggressor, the bigot, the hater. NO MATTER WHAT. NO MATTER WHAT. NO MATTER WHAT. The FBI would come and blow HIS head off. And his whole family would get tarred as Nazis, etc. So, whites really have no choice but to get on their knees and take the beatings.

    I wonder if it will ever stop?
     
  6. nosarcasm
    Offline

    nosarcasm Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    931
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Idaho
    Ratings:
    +68
    I still think it is safer to be white then black. You can always get a gun
    if you need more protection.
     
  7. musicman
    Offline

    musicman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,171
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +533

    If you mean that whites are safer from blacks than other blacks are, that's not exactly front page news, nor does it negate any of the facts being pointed out in this thread.

    As for " You can always get a gun...", you're too bloody right! Conceal and carry laws are popping up like wildfires across this country. America is beginning to come to it's senses, after having been knocked stupid by the vapors of sixties radicalism and head-up-the-ass social re-engineering. A lot of people are getting ready to learn - the hard way - that an armed society is a polite society.
     
  8. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    But you CAN'T just "get a gun" to protect yourself. At least not in areas you'd need it most. In NYC, you cannot. You are not allowed. But what if you did? What if a white guy brandished a gun at a black thug? You'd first be criminally charged. The prosecutor would go after you for threatening poor oppressed black man in do-rag. THEN you would be tied up in civil litigation for the rest of your life because black man would sue you. He could get a lot of money. You would lose your house.

    So, your best bet is to just allow the blacks to attack you. And then apologize to THEM. That's the only allowable course of action in America.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. musicman
    Offline

    musicman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    5,171
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +533
    Don't lose hope, William. Remember the shape this country was in before January, 1981? Collective sanity can achieve the impossible!
     
  10. Big D
    Offline

    Big D Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    By far the majority of gun crimes are commited by blacks and hispanics. Without blacks and hispanics, using guns for protection would be unnecessary in the U.S.

    http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/proportiontab.htm
     

Share This Page