We need to have mandatory training, some gun owners say? And this is what the democrats do......

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,970
52,238
2,290
Mandatory training to own or carry a gun is nothing more than a way to keep people from being able to exercise a Right...the democrats are good at denying Rights, they used Poll Taxes and Literacy tests to keep blacks from voting, and now they are using mandatory training requirements to keep normal people from owning guns....

So....to those gun owning people who think mandatory training is great.......you are nothing more than a useful idiot for the democrats....

In addition to 18 hours of classroom and live-fire training, the state now requires applicants to provide four character witnesses, a list of past and present social media accounts, and to sit for an in-person interview with a judge and get gun safes for their home and vehicle.

“Every week, we probably get 10 or 12 phone calls with people who can’t afford it, or can’t do it in their busy schedules because they’re now working two and three jobs,” Jenkins said. “You know, I’m waiting for the class action lawsuit — for people who can’t afford to do it; can’t afford … to exercise their Second Amendment rights.”





Any other Right....just imagine............
 
It would be great if we could have the same kind of training before somebody could vote.

A 40 class on the horrors of socialism would be a good start.

It would help to educated these stupid Moon Bats that vote but don't know what the hell destruction they are enabling.
 
Mandatory training to own or carry a gun is nothing more than a way to keep people from being able to exercise a Right...the democrats are good at denying Rights, they used Poll Taxes and Literacy tests to keep blacks from voting, and now they are using mandatory training requirements to keep normal people from owning guns....

So....to those gun owning people who think mandatory training is great.......you are nothing more than a useful idiot for the democrats....

In addition to 18 hours of classroom and live-fire training, the state now requires applicants to provide four character witnesses, a list of past and present social media accounts, and to sit for an in-person interview with a judge and get gun safes for their home and vehicle.

“Every week, we probably get 10 or 12 phone calls with people who can’t afford it, or can’t do it in their busy schedules because they’re now working two and three jobs,” Jenkins said. “You know, I’m waiting for the class action lawsuit — for people who can’t afford to do it; can’t afford … to exercise their Second Amendment rights.”





Any other Right....just imagine............
Illegal under Bruen.
 
It would be great if we could have the same kind of training before somebody could vote.

A 40 class on the horrors of socialism would be a good start.

It would help to educated these stupid Moon Bats that vote but don't know what the hell destruction they are enabling.
Why do you think they eliminated civics classes in HS?

They want the voting public to be dumber than a bag of hammers.
 
Mandatory training to own or carry a gun is nothing more than a way to keep people from being able to exercise a Right...the democrats are good at denying Rights, they used Poll Taxes and Literacy tests to keep blacks from voting, and now they are using mandatory training requirements to keep normal people from owning guns....

So....to those gun owning people who think mandatory training is great.......you are nothing more than a useful idiot for the democrats....

In addition to 18 hours of classroom and live-fire training, the state now requires applicants to provide four character witnesses, a list of past and present social media accounts, and to sit for an in-person interview with a judge and get gun safes for their home and vehicle.

“Every week, we probably get 10 or 12 phone calls with people who can’t afford it, or can’t do it in their busy schedules because they’re now working two and three jobs,” Jenkins said. “You know, I’m waiting for the class action lawsuit — for people who can’t afford to do it; can’t afford … to exercise their Second Amendment rights.”





Any other Right....just imagine............

How about we just train idiot liberals not to kill people? If we can train seals to balance a ball on their nose, surely we could train idiot liberals not to kill people.

Or am I expecting too much?
 
Any appeals judge not appointed by The Worthless Negro or Potatohead would throw that out in a heartbeat in light of Bruen.
 
Mandatory training to own or carry a gun is nothing more than a way to keep people from being able to exercise a Right

I agree with you.

But I have always STRONGLY SUGGESTED (and still do) that anybody who wants to own a gun "really should" go thru firearm safety training first.

But mandatory...no!
 
I agree with you.

But I have always STRONGLY SUGGESTED (and still do) that anybody who wants to own a gun "really should" go thru firearm safety training first.

But mandatory...no!

I support getting as
much training as you can afford and to keep up as luch as possible.....but guns are not complicated tools and you dont have to be a Navy SEAL to ise one to save your life...

And someone who doesnt have wnough money to afford lessons should not be
barred from gun ownership....

In fact, a lot of people have friends and relatives who can teach them all they meed to know to deploy a gun....red tape is jist ised to punish and persecute normal Americans
 
I agree with you.

But I have always STRONGLY SUGGESTED (and still do) that anybody who wants to own a gun "really should" go thru firearm safety training first.

But mandatory...no!

My problem with that is the government would then have a list of gun owners.
Sure would make it easier when it came down to gun seizures....so no thanks.
 
I agree with you.

But I have always STRONGLY SUGGESTED (and still do) that anybody who wants to own a gun "really should" go thru firearm safety training first.

But mandatory...no!
Firearms training, just like background checks is absolutely worthless.

If somebody wants to use a firearm for a crime nothing the government can do will stop them.

The crime should never be the possession of a firearm. Only the crime committed with the firearm.
 
I agree with you.

But I have always STRONGLY SUGGESTED (and still do) that anybody who wants to own a gun "really should" go thru firearm safety training first.

But mandatory...no!
Having one on their own property, I don't care. YouTube videos of idiots shooting guns through their ceilings and walls, with that surprised look on their face are hilarious. The just should not be allowed to carry off their property without training. I don't care if they endanger their own family or blow their own head off, for that matter. That said, their should be a minimum standard training to walk the streets locked and cocked.
 
I agree with you.

But I have always STRONGLY SUGGESTED (and still do) that anybody who wants to own a gun "really should" go thru firearm safety training first.

But mandatory...no!
It’s like taking a motorcycle safety class before buying a motorcycle. You learn a lot, but it shouldn’t be mandatory.
 
It would be great if we could have the same kind of training before somebody could vote.

A 40 class on the horrors of socialism would be a good start.

It would help to educated these stupid Moon Bats that vote but don't know what the hell destruction they are enabling.
It would be great if we could have the same kind of training before somebody could have a baby
 

Forum List

Back
Top