Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.
It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.
“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.
“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.
“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.
“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
The past is prologue. Liberals were once big defenders of child sex, adult-child sex, they were sympathetic to NAMBLA. Their only mistake was that the launched that revolution too soon. They realized the mistake, back-tracked, and refocused on normalizing homosexuals, then they took up the case of men who say they are women so that they can shower with women in changerooms.
Understand how the Left works, there is always some new victim group which needs to be normalized.
Here's an expose on the crimes of the Left from a liberal German magazine -
The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
The past is prologue. Liberals were once big defenders of child sex, adult-child sex, they were sympathetic to NAMBLA. Their only mistake was that the launched that revolution too soon. They realized the mistake, back-tracked, and refocused on normalizing homosexuals, then they took up the case of men who say they are women so that they can shower with women in changerooms.
Understand how the Left works, there is always some new victim group which needs to be normalized.
Here's an expose on the crimes of the Left from a liberal German magazine -
The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far
I never have been, but please pigeonhole the best you can...
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
The past is prologue. Liberals were once big defenders of child sex, adult-child sex, they were sympathetic to NAMBLA. Their only mistake was that the launched that revolution too soon. They realized the mistake, back-tracked, and refocused on normalizing homosexuals, then they took up the case of men who say they are women so that they can shower with women in changerooms.
Understand how the Left works, there is always some new victim group which needs to be normalized.
Here's an expose on the crimes of the Left from a liberal German magazine -
The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far
I never have been, but please pigeonhole the best you can...
But you likely will be. Look at the evolving opinion of liberals on homosexuals and the Homosexual Agenda. Those crazy dope-smoking, free-love hippies of the 60s weren't keen on homosexuals. Think of it like this. Normal behavior is contained by a circle. Outside of that circle is a larger circle, abnormal behavior. That's where homosexuality fits. Obviously the radius of the outer circle is larger than the radius of the inner circle. Liberals work to shrink the radius of the outer circle. As the radius shrinks the abnormal comes closer and closer to the radius of the inner circle. They're performing the same trick with transsexuals now. They've begun on polygamy, already there are liberals defenders of incest so long as it is adults and consensual in nature. The left has already tried with child sex and retreated.
There is some malignancy in the liberal mind where they just get peeved about society judging behaviors to be abnormal and so they work to normalize the abnormal.
You're not on the child-sex bandwagon yet because the notion is still too far out there, too outlandish, just like the idea of a bride and a groom in a wedding ceremony both being men was too outlandish to consider back in 1960 and yet today liberals pride themselves on supporting this insane construction. Give it time, you'll be cheering on child-adult sex.
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
The past is prologue. Liberals were once big defenders of child sex, adult-child sex, they were sympathetic to NAMBLA. Their only mistake was that the launched that revolution too soon. They realized the mistake, back-tracked, and refocused on normalizing homosexuals, then they took up the case of men who say they are women so that they can shower with women in changerooms.
Understand how the Left works, there is always some new victim group which needs to be normalized.
Here's an expose on the crimes of the Left from a liberal German magazine -
The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far
I never have been, but please pigeonhole the best you can...
But you likely will be. Look at the evolving opinion of liberals on homosexuals and the Homosexual Agenda. Those crazy dope-smoking, free-love hippies of the 60s weren't keen on homosexuals. Think of it like this. Normal behavior is contained by a circle. Outside of that circle is a larger circle, abnormal behavior. That's where homosexuality fits. Obviously the radius of the outer circle is larger than the radius of the inner circle. Liberals work to shrink the radius of the outer circle. As the radius shrinks the abnormal comes closer and closer to the radius of the inner circle. They're performing the same trick with transsexuals now. They've begun on polygamy, already there are liberals defenders of incest so long as it is adults and consensual in nature. The left has already tried with child sex and retreated.
There is some malignancy in the liberal mind where they just get peeved about society judging behaviors to be abnormal and so they work to normalize the abnormal.
You're not on the child-sex bandwagon yet because the notion is still too far out there, too outlandish, just like the idea of a bride and a groom in a wedding ceremony both being men was too outlandish to consider back in 1960 and yet today liberals pride themselves on supporting this insane construction. Give it time, you'll be cheering on child-adult sex.
Sorry to break you little heart, but, I never will be..so move you mind meld somewhere else, it does not work on me...
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
The past is prologue. Liberals were once big defenders of child sex, adult-child sex, they were sympathetic to NAMBLA. Their only mistake was that the launched that revolution too soon. They realized the mistake, back-tracked, and refocused on normalizing homosexuals, then they took up the case of men who say they are women so that they can shower with women in changerooms.
Understand how the Left works, there is always some new victim group which needs to be normalized.
Here's an expose on the crimes of the Left from a liberal German magazine -
The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far
I never have been, but please pigeonhole the best you can...
But you likely will be. Look at the evolving opinion of liberals on homosexuals and the Homosexual Agenda. Those crazy dope-smoking, free-love hippies of the 60s weren't keen on homosexuals. Think of it like this. Normal behavior is contained by a circle. Outside of that circle is a larger circle, abnormal behavior. That's where homosexuality fits. Obviously the radius of the outer circle is larger than the radius of the inner circle. Liberals work to shrink the radius of the outer circle. As the radius shrinks the abnormal comes closer and closer to the radius of the inner circle. They're performing the same trick with transsexuals now. They've begun on polygamy, already there are liberals defenders of incest so long as it is adults and consensual in nature. The left has already tried with child sex and retreated.
There is some malignancy in the liberal mind where they just get peeved about society judging behaviors to be abnormal and so they work to normalize the abnormal.
You're not on the child-sex bandwagon yet because the notion is still too far out there, too outlandish, just like the idea of a bride and a groom in a wedding ceremony both being men was too outlandish to consider back in 1960 and yet today liberals pride themselves on supporting this insane construction. Give it time, you'll be cheering on child-adult sex.
Sorry to break you little heart, but, I never will be..so move you mind meld somewhere else, it does not work on me...
Look, I don't know how old you are, so I'm speaking in terms of probabilities, and back in the 1960s, liberal teenagers (because teenagers and the young are the one's who are most radical) thought the idea of Chuck and Bob being bride and groom was utter insanity. And yet here we are today, people like you thinking it's normal. This movement illustrates how damn effective Leftist propaganda can be. The unthinkable transforms into the normal.
As backwards as some liberal views are, to make it seem as if liberals would support this is backwards as well.
The past is prologue. Liberals were once big defenders of child sex, adult-child sex, they were sympathetic to NAMBLA. Their only mistake was that the launched that revolution too soon. They realized the mistake, back-tracked, and refocused on normalizing homosexuals, then they took up the case of men who say they are women so that they can shower with women in changerooms.
Understand how the Left works, there is always some new victim group which needs to be normalized.
Here's an expose on the crimes of the Left from a liberal German magazine -
The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far
I never have been, but please pigeonhole the best you can...
But you likely will be. Look at the evolving opinion of liberals on homosexuals and the Homosexual Agenda. Those crazy dope-smoking, free-love hippies of the 60s weren't keen on homosexuals. Think of it like this. Normal behavior is contained by a circle. Outside of that circle is a larger circle, abnormal behavior. That's where homosexuality fits. Obviously the radius of the outer circle is larger than the radius of the inner circle. Liberals work to shrink the radius of the outer circle. As the radius shrinks the abnormal comes closer and closer to the radius of the inner circle. They're performing the same trick with transsexuals now. They've begun on polygamy, already there are liberals defenders of incest so long as it is adults and consensual in nature. The left has already tried with child sex and retreated.
There is some malignancy in the liberal mind where they just get peeved about society judging behaviors to be abnormal and so they work to normalize the abnormal.
You're not on the child-sex bandwagon yet because the notion is still too far out there, too outlandish, just like the idea of a bride and a groom in a wedding ceremony both being men was too outlandish to consider back in 1960 and yet today liberals pride themselves on supporting this insane construction. Give it time, you'll be cheering on child-adult sex.
Sorry to break you little heart, but, I never will be..so move you mind meld somewhere else, it does not work on me...
Look, I don't know how old you are, so I'm speaking in terms of probabilities, and back in the 1960s, liberal teenagers (because teenagers and the young are the one's who are most radical) thought the idea of Chuck and Bob being bride and groom was utter insanity. And yet here we are today, people like you thinking it's normal. This movement illustrates how damn effective Leftist propaganda can be. The unthinkable transforms into the normal.
