Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you can't believe a hyper-partisan felon convicted for fraud that makes a paranoidal propaganda flick with all the probative substance of a sparrow fart, who can you believe?Complete fucking morons.
This was a carefully put together documentary with official geotracking data and official election video. But I get it, it's much easier to just have your "knowledge" spoon fed to you rather than find out for yourself.Rocky and Bullwinkle is funnier, and far more credible.
Spend an hour and watch it for yourself. Or you can just mock and ignore everything and everyone who doesn't agree with you, that keeps the world nice and simple.Man, thats gotta be frustrating. You've got all of this evidence and you won't take it to court....why?
The election had 0 integrity.It was a free and fair election, the same kind we had in 2016. If Trump had of won in 2020, there would not be a word spoken about this fantasy "election fraud" that the sore loser crybaby keeps whining about, and the propagandists keep lying about.
You just loved it when the FBI used geotracking data to capture every single J6 protestor, but somehow the exact same data analysis is worthless if it reveals something you don't want to believe. What does that say about you?If you can't believe a hyper-partisan felon convicted for fraud that makes a paranoidal propaganda flick with all the probative substance of a sparrow fart, who can you believe?
The true test of crackpot confections is, "Can the 'evidence' meet minimal standards demanded by our legal system?"
If the delusion festers only on the fringe, reasonable folks draw reasonable conclusions.
Between 12 AM to 5 AM in the morning? Nope. There is data that shows 262(?) people made over 5,000 trips to the same boxes over and over in that time period.Complete fucking morons.
www.apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-covid-technology-health-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762
If a cellphone went near a drop box more than 10 times and a nonprofit more than five times from Oct. 1 to Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a “mule” — its name for someone engaged in an illegal ballot collection scheme in cahoots with a nonprofit.
The group’s claims of a paid ballot harvesting scheme are supported in the film only by one unidentified whistleblower said to be from San Luis, Arizona, who said she saw people picking up what she “assumed” to be payments for ballot collection. The film contains no evidence of such payments in other states in 2020.
Plus, experts say cellphone location data, even at its most advanced, can only reliably track a smartphone within a few meters — not close enough to know whether someone actually dropped off a ballot or just walked or drove nearby.
“You could use cellular evidence to say this person was in that area, but to say they were at the ballot box, you’re stretching it a lot,” said Aaron Striegel, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Notre Dame. “There’s always a pretty healthy amount of uncertainty that comes with this.”
What’s more, ballot drop boxes are often intentionally placed in busy areas, such as college campuses, libraries, government buildings and apartment complexes — increasing the likelihood that innocent citizens got caught in the group’s dragnet, Striegel said.
Similarly, there are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might be visiting both a nonprofit’s office and one of those busy areas. Delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers and elected officials all have legitimate reasons to cross paths with numerous drop boxes or nonprofits in a given day.
Spend an hour and watch it for yourself. Or you can just mock and ignore everything and everyone who doesn't agree with you, that keeps the world nice and simple.
You just loved it when the FBI used geotracking data to capture every single J6 protestor, but somehow the exact same data analysis is worthless if it reveals something you don't want to believe. What does that say about you?
In a normal time, that would matter. With these folks, it's fake news.The evidence against Trump's January 6 goons resulted in nearly nine-hundred arrests.
The felon's propaganda flick contrived no credible evidence to prosecute anybody.
Why would people put any store by a propoganda film produced by a convicted election fraudster ?There is enough evidence to convict people of serious voter fraud. Hopefully when we get control a real look into this will happen.
nice.... 5 stars.Why would people put any store by a propoganda film produced by a convicted election fraudster ?
He hasnt called it "How I did it",
So, you follow Bill Barr. Been a fan long?Rocky and Bullwinkle is funnier, and far more credible.
I am cognizant of prominent officeholders, including Trump toadies who can't keep from laughing at a felon's feeble propaganda flick.So, you follow Bill Barr. Been a fan long?
His evidence meets the standards so well, that it has been used to put murderers, rapists, and other violent knuckle draggers behind bars.If you can't believe a hyper-partisan felon convicted for fraud that makes a paranoidal propaganda flick with all the probative substance of a sparrow fart, who can you believe?
The true test of crackpot confections is, "Can the 'evidence' meet minimal standards demanded by our legal system?"
If the delusion festers only on the fringe, reasonable folks draw reasonable conclusions.
Prithee, Buttercup, what, specifically, are the judicial and legislative actions that rabid Trumpy partisans have initiated predicated upon the felon's laughable flick? Just list a few.His evidence meets the standards so well...
So suck on that, assclown.
Trump isn't the issue, dipschitt.Prithee, Buttercup, what, specifically, are the judicial and legislative actions that rabid Trumpy partisans have initiated predicated upon the felon's laughable flick? Just list a few.
I already knew that you could not point to any evidence from the felon's fantastical flick that had the credibility to trigger any charges against anyone.The geotracking information used in "2000 Mules" was good enough to put J6 trespassers in specific rooms in the Capitol...As mentioned, it's strong enough evidence to put away murderers for life.
Kangaroo court. You convicted him on something nobody else has ever been charged withWhy would people put any store by a propoganda film produced by a convicted election fraudster ?
He hasnt called it "How I did it",
I pointed to the most accurate and legally accepted valid evidence....Sorry that fucks with your bullshit lying narrative, but there it is.I already knew that you could not point to any evidence from the felon's fantastical flick that had the credibility to trigger any charges against anyone.
It's airy-fairy propaganda poo poo, and no court in the land would take it seriously, Sunshine.
