Was Massive Vote Fraud Confirmed with a Fishtail?

The votes would have to be in a congressperson's district. Who got the 35,000 extra votes?
Too easy you dumb OX. Millions of Ballots put thru Bidum only (see GA). Trump 70% was so far up they could only rush thru one mark. Whatever it took.

Plenty of whistleblowers ignored by corrupt Courts & R politiciana.
 
That's 81 million counted, canvassed & and certified votes. Just like all presidential elections.

:dance:
That election was not even close to any other presidential election. There was never that much opportunity for fraud and they took full advantage of it.
 
Establishment Republicans were in on the fraud. That is a gimme.
zziqbpsce8h71.jpg
 
That election was not even close to any other presidential election. There was never that much opportunity for fraud and they took full advantage of it.

Did you forget? You're deranged, FruitLoops. The 2004 election was close.
 
This data being examined. It is fact, not conspiracy.

Sometimes fraud is so far beyond the pale, so egregious, that it is difficult to accept that it happened. But evidence can be too blatant to explain away, especially when two totally different sources of information confirm the existence of the very same fraudulent activity. Such a convergence of evidence occurred in the 2020 election.

Remember whistleblowers can cause an impeachment.
An explosive allegation was made: In Pima County, thirty-five thousand (35,000) votes had been added to each Democrat candidate in the election, including Joe Biden. The allegation was made anonymously by someone claiming that he or she met with Democrat Pima County election officials on September 10, 2020, where a plan to rig the vote was hatched.

The tipster’s written words were described and posted at a meeting of the Arizona Senate on November 30, 2020. Retired Army Col. Phil Waldron told the Senate members,


More than a year ago, in 2021, I sent a FOIA request to the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. I requested all documents related to the Division’s investigation of the Pima County election fraud allegation. The Division acknowledged my communication and promised a quick response, as required by regulation. However, a response was never issued, despite multiple follow-up requests.

Did the FBI check into this? I doubt it has the time. Right now, the agency is busy trying to distinguish Proud Boys from FBI agents pretending to be Proud Boys.

Meh. Not a big deal.

Maybe when we get a rock ribbed Republican like Trump or Jake Starkey they’ll ORDER the DOJ and FBI to look into it.

Barr and Krebs both assured us the election was legit. What was Trump supposed to do, appoint honest people and Patriots?
 
Speaking of stupid LW hacks.......AZ found over 23K names that voted "more than once". they just gloss over the report and call you a RW loon for questioning it. They re-used a name on the Voter roll and got caught. Over 53K like that were found in Maricopa alone. but now the report is buried somewhere.

No one is fighting for the truth. Courts and Politicians like it the way things are. They get rich.......normal folks compensate them Why make waves?
They didn't find that, they ALLEGED that, with no proof.... You do realize many people have the same names, so merely the same name in different counties is not proof.
 
Idiot, there is nothing wrong with voting by mail.

That's what Trump himself did, while he got his rubes "sacrificing" in long lines during a pandemic.
Submitting a requested absentee ballot isn't the "voting by mail" that you cheaters have saddled numerous states with.

I'm certain that this has been pointed out to you, so why do you keep lying about it?
 
Submitting a requested absentee ballot isn't the "voting by mail" that you cheaters have saddled numerous states with.

I'm certain that this has been pointed out to you, so why do you keep lying about it?

If you're talking about states which send out unsolicited ballots to all registered residents in their respective state, you lose again as only one of the contested swing states did that. And in the 8 other states which did that, no one complained about massive fraud.
 
Not an analogy, nitwit.

Of course it is. How stupid are you?

An analogy is a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation.

And you compared the uniquity of phone numbers with names in a moronic attempt to show names are too unique in order to explain there was fraud where there wasn't.

Sadly for you, you lack the cognitive skills to fool anyone.
 
Irrelevant to the point, jackass.

Nope, dead on accurate. You're attempting, but failing, to explain how fraud permeated in the swing states. To that avail, you tried leveraging the concerns about unsolicited ballots. But that too is a fail since it negligably impacted the contested states. And largely, in itself, worked successfully as designed unquestionably.
 

Forum List

Back
Top