Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are not a Christian --- according to your OWN admission. Therefore, you should refrain from using the name of the Lord in vain. It is insulting to those who believe in Jesus and does NOTHING to promote your point of view in any way...And there yougo, whining like a little bitch again. Jesus man, if these topics are too much for you to Bear, then don't open the thread. Stick to your retro 1970s abortion debates, ya SissyHmm, no, I'm spot on. You are a religious nutball, and you try to undermine science, when it suits you to do so. You don't seem to mind shitting all over science while banging away on your quantum mechanical device, thoughHmm, no, thats a loe. You are clearly trying to make a bigger point that science cannot be trusted. But you are clearly to big a sissy to follow through on it, because you know you will be forced to say some very stupid things that even embarrass yourself. You guys are a dime a dozen.I didn't paint it as anything more than a statement of fact,
More leftarded projections.
Got anything else?
Lol.
As you and your leftarded ilk are the ones who "shit all over science" (especially when it comes to the biology) . . . You are projecting yet again.
Also, I know how much it triggers you to know that not all your opponents are religious but that's your problem. Not mine.
I have many a post here on USMB and in many other forums to show my disdain for anyone who argues their views (especially against abortion) from a religious basis.
The earth and the moon both revolve around the sun buddy. As we travel around the sun the moon goes right with us.I'd like a Nickel for every Religionist who says 'Evolution is only a theory'. Not knowing Science does Not use 'Theory' for mere Conjecture but for a well documented set of facts.
The board is polluted with alot of these Literalists and 7-Eleven Adventists who know Zero about science.
Warning: Gravity is "Only a Theory"
by Ellery Schempp
Gravity: It's Only a Theory | NCSE
All physics textbooks should include this warning label:`
“This textbook contains material on Gravity. Universal Gravity is a theory, Not a fact, regarding the natural law of attraction. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.”The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a “fact,” when in fact it is not even a good theory.
First of all, no one has measured gravity for every atom and every star. It is simply a religious belief that it is “universal.” Secondly, school textbooks routinely make false statements. For example, “the moon goes around the earth.” If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun. Anybody can look up at night and see the obvious gaps in gravity theory.
The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon's “gravity” were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are 2 -- not 1 -- high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, two high tides falsifies gravity.
[...... Big snip........]
It is not even clear why we need a theory of gravity -- there is not a single mention in the Bible, and the patriotic founding fathers never referred to it.
Finally, the mere name “Universal Theory of Gravity” or “Theory of Universal Gravity” (the secularists like to use confusing language) has a distinctly Socialist ring to it. The core idea of “to each according to his weight, from each according to his mass” is Communist. There is no reason that gravity should apply to the just and the unjust equally, and the saved should have relief from such “universalism.” If we have Universal Gravity now, then Universal health care will be sure to follow. It is this kind of Universalism that saps a nation's moral fiber.
Overall, the Theory of Universal Gravity is just not an attractive theory. It is based on borderline evidence, has many serious gaps in what it claims to explain, is clearly wrong in important respects, and has social and moral deficiencies. If taught in the public schools, by mis-directed “educators,” it has to be balanced with alternative, more attractive theories with genuine gravamen and spiritual gravitas.
Whew!
The earth and the moon both revolve around the sun buddy. As we travel around the sun the moon goes right with us.
I'd like a Nickel for every Religionist who says 'Evolution is only a theory'. Not knowing Science does Not use 'Theory' for mere Conjecture but for a well documented set of facts.
The board is polluted with alot of these Literalists and 7-Eleven Adventists who know Zero about science.
science believers.
science believers.
LOL!
Those ignorant science believers, am I right?
? It looks like it to me.
Oh by the way - in every "center" of a black hole (indeed it is the black hole) is a point with an infinite density of energy.
Oh by the way - in every "center" of a black hole (indeed it is the black hole) is a point with an infinite density of energy.
That is impossible due to entropy in the material world.
Even the black or white hole
has entropy or heat transfer.
Where do you get such bogus science?
The closest we can get to infinity is having countless number of items. There is no infinity
or else one has to divide by zero which is impossible (except for God as creator).
Oh by the way - in every "center" of a black hole (indeed it is the black hole) is a point with an infinite density of energy.
That is impossible due to entropy in the material world.
That's why we have problems with this imagination. Nevertheless the univierse once started also in such a point. Before was not before but only nothing (because the law of the growing entropy says so). The universe was not - nothing was - then it was. Christians believe since about 1700 years "God made everythting out of nothing." If a Christian is not doing so, then this is unimportant. But we found no better explanation until today. The quality of this clear declaration is the same as in physics - but in physics the concrete quantities and mathematical structures are much more complex, than the philosophy behind this thought. But there seems not to exist a real contradiction. And even if someone will find out the universe started in another way this principle becomes not stupid - it is an orientation mark. If someone thinks the way is in another direction, then this one has to find good new arguments.
Even the black or white hole
White holes are an idea. Black holes are reality.
has entropy or heat transfer.
A black hole has what inside? "Entropy" a "heat transfer"? How do you know? I made very clear what I said is only an idea. I used it for a principle lack of knowledge (we get not any information from behind of the event horizon). I used this example to show what we do in case we find such a lack of knowledge.
Where do you get such bogus science?
Good grief. How are you able to take yourselve serios?
The closest we can get to infinity is having countless number of items. There is no infinity
If you like to find out what's the size of a circle line you need "infintiy" to solve such a problem. It are existing for example countably infinites - but also infinites, which are not countably. The number of all decimals is for example a not countably infinite.
or else one has to divide by zero which is impossible (except for God as creator).
It is also for god "impossible" to divide by zero. This operation is just simple not defined because it gives results "without logic". But god is logos: He speaks not only the timeless creative word - he is the timeless creative spirit on his own. Tell a mathematician "to divide by zero will bring you in a hell" and he will laugh loud and agree. Sure exists god also in every hell and will lead out of hell - but god leads not into a hell.
Oh by the way - in every "center" of a black hole (indeed it is the black hole) is a point with an infinite density of energy.
That is impossible due to entropy in the material world.
That's why we have problems with this imagination. Nevertheless the univierse once started also in such a point. Before was not before but only nothing (because the law of the growing entropy says so). The universe was not - nothing was - then it was. Christians believe since about 1700 years "God made everythting out of nothing." If a Christian is not doing so, then this is unimportant. But we found no better explanation until today. The quality of this clear declaration is the same as in physics - but in physics the concrete quantities and mathematical structures are much more complex, than the philosophy behind this thought. But there seems not to exist a real contradiction. And even if someone will find out the universe started in another way this principle becomes not stupid - it is an orientation mark. If someone thinks the way is in another direction, then this one has to find good new arguments.
Even the black or white hole
White holes are an idea. Black holes are reality.
has entropy or heat transfer.
A black hole has what inside? "Entropy" a "heat transfer"? How do you know? I made very clear what I said is only an idea. I used it for a principle lack of knowledge (we get not any information from behind of the event horizon). I used this example to show what we do in case we find such a lack of knowledge.
Where do you get such bogus science?
Good grief. How are you able to take yourselve serios?
The closest we can get to infinity is having countless number of items. There is no infinity
If you like to find out what's the size of a circle line you need "infintiy" to solve such a problem. It are existing for example countably infinites - but also infinites, which are not countably. The number of all decimals is for example a not countably infinite.
or else one has to divide by zero which is impossible (except for God as creator).
It is also for god "impossible" to divide by zero. This operation is just simple not defined because it gives results "without logic". But god is logos: He speaks not only the timeless creative word - he is the timeless creative spirit on his own. Tell a mathematician "to divide by zero will bring you in a hell" and he will laugh loud and agree. Sure exists god also in every hell and will lead out of hell - but god leads not into a hell.
Much of what you say is based on your imaginary science. You think people of today are better able to explain the past than one who was there. In fact, he explained so people in ancient times would understand as would people of today.
Dividing by zero does not give results that are without logic. For example 2/0 = n. It means n x 0 = 2. Any elementary school pupil who has learned division can tell you this. There is no n multiplied by zero will give you 2. I just used 2 as an example. It could be any number. What it means is only a creator or God can make it work as they can create something from nothing and it adds up to 2. QED.
It is evidence for God or ∞. Instead, atheist science makes up imaginary stuff like infinite multiverses and infinite singularity that defy the laws of physics and you believe them.
f you like to find out what's the size of a circle line you need "infintiy" to solve such a problem. It are existing for example countably infinites - but also infinites, which are not countably. The number of all decimals is for example a not countably infinite.
Like You, Genepiss is stupid, and in the wrong order, even allowing for grotesque time-fudging.[
Much of what you say is based on your imaginary science. You think people of today are better able to explain the past than one who was there. In fact, he explained so people in ancient times would understand as would people of today.
Dividing by zero does not give results that are without logic. For example 2/0 = n. It means n x 0 = 2. Any elementary school pupil who has learned division can tell you this. There is no n multiplied by zero will give you 2. I just used 2 as an example. It could be any number. What it means is only a creator or God can make it work as they can create something from nothing and it adds up to 2. QED.
It is evidence for God or ∞. Instead, atheist science makes up imaginary stuff like infinite multiverses and infinite singularity that defy the laws of physics and you believe them.
Like You, Genepiss is stupid, and in the wrong order, even allowing for grotesque time-fudging.[
Much of what you say is based on your imaginary science. You think people of today are better able to explain the past than one who was there. In fact, he explained so people in ancient times would understand as would people of today.
Dividing by zero does not give results that are without logic. For example 2/0 = n. It means n x 0 = 2. Any elementary school pupil who has learned division can tell you this. There is no n multiplied by zero will give you 2. I just used 2 as an example. It could be any number. What it means is only a creator or God can make it work as they can create something from nothing and it adds up to 2. QED.
It is evidence for God or ∞. Instead, atheist science makes up imaginary stuff like infinite multiverses and infinite singularity that defy the laws of physics and you believe them.
`
Like You, Genepiss is stupid, and in the wrong order, even allowing for grotesque time-fudging.[
Much of what you say is based on your imaginary science. You think people of today are better able to explain the past than one who was there. In fact, he explained so people in ancient times would understand as would people of today.
Dividing by zero does not give results that are without logic. For example 2/0 = n. It means n x 0 = 2. Any elementary school pupil who has learned division can tell you this. There is no n multiplied by zero will give you 2. I just used 2 as an example. It could be any number. What it means is only a creator or God can make it work as they can create something from nothing and it adds up to 2. QED.
It is evidence for God or ∞. Instead, atheist science makes up imaginary stuff like infinite multiverses and infinite singularity that defy the laws of physics and you believe them.
`
Like You, Genepiss is stupid, and in the wrong order, even allowing for grotesque time-fudging.[
Much of what you say is based on your imaginary science. You think people of today are better able to explain the past than one who was there. In fact, he explained so people in ancient times would understand as would people of today.
Dividing by zero does not give results that are without logic. For example 2/0 = n. It means n x 0 = 2. Any elementary school pupil who has learned division can tell you this. There is no n multiplied by zero will give you 2. I just used 2 as an example. It could be any number. What it means is only a creator or God can make it work as they can create something from nothing and it adds up to 2. QED.
It is evidence for God or ∞. Instead, atheist science makes up imaginary stuff like infinite multiverses and infinite singularity that defy the laws of physics and you believe them.
`
newsflash it wasn't an historical or scientific book, the Babylons already had the 60 minute hour, 24 hour day, figured out solar eclipses..... it was written to say their is only one deity.....GOD
You never write more than one line you dishonest little Shltbag.sounds like some psuedo scientist needs to be thrown out a window to test their theory.....~S~
