newpolitics
vegan atheist indy
- Sep 27, 2008
- 2,931
- 262
- 48
...or it could just be real science.
It is real science, I am not doubting its validity, I am questioning the motivation for posting it.
So a person can post any random bit that supports AGW and that is OK but anyone posting something that doesn't support it is "suspect". Who appointed you dictator?
Dictator? That's a little melodramatic. I am really tired of the republican storyline. It is obviously self-serving to adopt beliefs that allow you continue a lifestyle without having to consider its effects. By denying AGW, people are able to do this. This is my opinion of this disagreement over AGW.
Last edited: