Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since ISIS is backed by those Iraqi Generals who were dismissed after the Iraq War, who knows how much money they had stashed away during the Saddam Hussein's regime. Does anyone honestly think that all those coming from different parts of the world to join ISIS would have been able to conquer all that territory if they weren't led by experienced military men. Probably if these generals had been kept on, there would never have been any group called ISIS. As for weapons, there are arms dealers all over who will sell arms to anyone willing to pay for them.
As it was stated by ISIS when they first appeared on the scene, that Syria was the stepping stone to the new Caliphate. They saw the chaos in Syria due to the Civil War, and saw their chance then to begin their start on their dream of a Caliphate.
There are many articles on the Internet about the leaders of ISIS being ex-Iraqi generals. Here is one of them.
How Disbanding the Iraqi Army Fueled ISIS
War with Syria!
NO!
A resounding NO!
got it?
Bin Laden's group and other radical groups worked closely with the CIA in Afghanistan. They couldn't have defeated the Soviets without the CIA.
You fringies create an alternative reality that you eventually begin to believe. There is no historical fact to the nonsense you so desperately cling to. Under Jimmy Carter, the USA began supplying the Mujahadeen with arm, particularly the Stinger hand held SAM that could down a KA-50 Hokum, the Russian gun ships that were shredding the Afghan resistance. The CIA provided training on these and other arms.
Osama bin Laden was not involved in these efforts or training.
Allegations of CIA assistance to Osama bin Laden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No, those assertions are preposterous. Of course Bin Laden's group received money, weapons, and training from American/Saudi/Pakistani intelligence agencies. It was vital to the effort to oust the Soviets. Bin Laden's group was just one of many radical Islamist groups to receive American support.
Idiot, the taliban is not al qaeda you stupid fucking bottom-feeding moron.
Boy, you sure are all in on that American Government/Corporate Media propaganda thing. The U.S. is the main cause of all the bloody carnage we're currently seeing in the Middle East. It had no valid or legal justification to declare 'Regime Change' and intervene in Syria's Civil War. Period, end of story.
Stupid asshole, who has been barrel-bombing whole cities for YEARS? That was assad.
Moron, who sent in militias to slaughter women and children at Houla and Baniyas? That was assad.
Fucking retard, it would be so much better if pieces of shit like you just stopped posting.
Bin Laden's group and other radical groups worked closely with the CIA in Afghanistan. They couldn't have defeated the Soviets without the CIA.
You fringies create an alternative reality that you eventually begin to believe. There is no historical fact to the nonsense you so desperately cling to. Under Jimmy Carter, the USA began supplying the Mujahadeen with arm, particularly the Stinger hand held SAM that could down a KA-50 Hokum, the Russian gun ships that were shredding the Afghan resistance. The CIA provided training on these and other arms.
Osama bin Laden was not involved in these efforts or training.
Allegations of CIA assistance to Osama bin Laden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There is a stark similarity of the posts from low IQ filth like that poster, and many others who claim the US started the syrian war, defend assad/iran/russia, etc. I believe that they are pro-putin russian internet trolling turds who are trying to misinform and misdirect the facts about assad, iran and russian tactics which have killed over 500K people there, and caused millions of refugees.
War with Syria!
NO!
A resounding NO!
got it?
Why did the U.S. intervene in Syria's Civil War? Assad never committed a hostile act against his neighbors or the U.S.
Why did the U.S. intervene in Syria's Civil War? Assad never committed a hostile act against his neighbors or the U.S.
Asshole, how many times do you plan to state this lie?
List all the nations Syria has invaded and bombed. Then compare that list with your own Nation's list. Syria was never a threat to its neighbors or the U.S. So why try to kill Assad?
List all the nations Syria has invaded and bombed. Then compare that list with your own Nation's list. Syria was never a threat to its neighbors or the U.S. So why try to kill Assad?
Why do low life, low IQ, worthless pieces of shit like you screech about every little action the US - but then twist themselves like pretzels trying to defend even the most egregious ones by enemies of the US?
I already stated - with a link - how syria/assad harbored/funded/armed terrorists attacking US troops inside iraq for years. The HQ of the terrorist insurgency was held in damascus. Those actions are tantamount to declarations of war, and assad is fortunate the US did not terminate his regime for them.
A major poll today showed only 19% of Americans in favor of this war!!
Is it really wise to go to war with that kind of opposition??
Oobop could get impeached, couldn't he?
Breaking NEWS
U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 10-7, approves a resolution authorizing a U.S. military response to chemical weapons use in Syria!
Great, once again we declare ourselves the world's morality police and put our citizens at risk.
Every congressman who votes for this lunacy should be tarred and feathered.
List all the nations Syria has invaded and bombed. Then compare that list with your own Nation's list. Syria was never a threat to its neighbors or the U.S. So why try to kill Assad?
Why do low life, low IQ, worthless pieces of shit like you screech about every little action the US - but then twist themselves like pretzels trying to defend even the most egregious ones by enemies of the US?
I already stated - with a link - how syria/assad harbored/funded/armed terrorists attacking US troops inside iraq for years. The HQ of the terrorist insurgency was held in damascus. Those actions are tantamount to declarations of war, and assad is fortunate the US did not terminate his regime for them.
Bullshite. Syria merely opposed the Iraq War like some of our own allies did. And it was absolutely right to oppose it. It was a bloody horrific blunder. The U.S. had no right to invade Iraq, or declare 'Regime Change' on Assad.
In fact, some U.S./Western leaders should have been arrested and tried for War Crimes. They committed horrific crimes against humanity in Iraq. If the U.S/West didn't own the International Justice System, those arrests would have happened.
Boy, you sure are all in on that American Government/Corporate Media propaganda thing. The U.S. is the main cause of all the bloody carnage we're currently seeing in the Middle East. It had no valid or legal justification to declare 'Regime Change' and intervene in Syria's Civil War. Period, end of story.
Stupid asshole, who has been barrel-bombing whole cities for YEARS? That was assad.
Moron, who sent in militias to slaughter women and children at Houla and Baniyas? That was assad.
Fucking retard, it would be so much better if pieces of shit like you just stopped posting.
It's their Civil War. The U.S. had no valid or legal justification to intervene. I truly believe we need to disengage from the Middle East at this point. We are the source of most of the bloody chaos there. We don't belong in those lands. Time to come home.
[
And your feelings now, Trump bot?
[
And your feelings now, Trump bot?
Trump offered a measured and rational response to Assad. It was a good move, sending a message with no casualties. Syria is none of our affair, BUT Obama armed and trained ISIS, stirring the pot. This means that the measured response was the best option under the circumstances.
It was an illegal response justified by a self-made criminal pretext. The same what Obama tried in 2013. Phrump´s missiles are garbage and all he achieved is that Syria´s allies increase their support and that the Coalition suspended Syria flights. Missile strikes are what Obama planned by the way. Phrump is the new Ubumu.[
And your feelings now, Trump bot?
Trump offered a measured and rational response to Assad. It was a good move, sending a message with no casualties. Syria is none of our affair, BUT Obama armed and trained ISIS, stirring the pot. This means that the measured response was the best option under the circumstances.
Since ISIS is backed by those Iraqi Generals who were dismissed after the Iraq War, who knows how much money they had stashed away during the Saddam Hussein's regime. Does anyone honestly think that all those coming from different parts of the world to join ISIS would have been able to conquer all that territory if they weren't led by experienced military men. Probably if these generals had been kept on, there would never have been any group called ISIS. As for weapons, there are arms dealers all over who will sell arms to anyone willing to pay for them.
As it was stated by ISIS when they first appeared on the scene, that Syria was the stepping stone to the new Caliphate. They saw the chaos in Syria due to the Civil War, and saw their chance then to begin their start on their dream of a Caliphate.
There are many articles on the Internet about the leaders of ISIS being ex-Iraqi generals. Here is one of them.
How Disbanding the Iraqi Army Fueled ISIS
I agree with this but think as usual, the problem was with iran who whipped up and forced the iraqi shias to demand the army be disbanded. They wanted it gone so they would have (like hez in lebanon) a weak national army to give them a free hand to stir up trouble and intimidate the sunnis without fearing any blowback. They wanted to be able to kill politicians, journalists and activists in iraq who would challenge them, ethnically cleanse sunnis out of various cities/regions, and be able to operate under iran's controlling hand without the threat of a national army. And they wanted to be able to force lots of sunnis out of government bureaucratic positions - which they did - which also led to a lot of anger and support to form ISIS, which was primarily a response to the iranian-driven sunni oppression in iraq.
Had the US told iran to fuck off, retained the national army, and crushed all of the shia militias, the sunnis would have remained empowered and not felt a need to form a group to protect them like ISIS. But the shit lazy media, and anti-american filth, prefer to lie and tell people that ISIS was "started by the US" - which is absolute garbage.