Wall Street Warns Dems: No Donations if You Nominate Liz Warren

[JustAGuy1]

"
Wall Street and the DNC have been in bed together like a couple of newlyweds for years now, but the honeymoon might finally end if Senator Elizabeth Warren takes the presidential nomination next year.

CNBC's Brian Schwartz reports that "several high-dollar Democratic donors and fundraisers in the business community" plan to "sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle" should Warren sit -- must... resist... urge... to... make... sit Indian-style joke -- at the top of the ticket. A private equity executive who wishes to remain anonymous told the network, "You’re in a box because you’re a Democrat and you’re thinking, ‘I want to help the party, but she’s going to hurt me, so I’m going to help President Trump'."

Warren's proposed "wealth tax," while of dubious constitutionality, threatens to place a 2% tax on the wealth -- not earnings -- of households worth $50 million or more. That's a lot of Wall Street people, it's safe to say.

"Democratic" socialist candidate Bernie Sanders promises an even bigger wealth tax, with a 1% levy on households worth more than $32 million, going all the way up to 8% for fortunes over $10 billion. So far Wall Street doesn't feel as threatened by the prospect of a Bernie candidacy, but with frontrunner Joe Biden sinking in poll after poll, who knows what might happen as the voting starts in Iowa next February."

Wall Street Warns Dems: No Donations if You Nominate Liz Warren

Rut Roh.

 

[kyzr]

Reality bites! Maybe the dems are counting on that Ukrainian and Chinese money again?

 

[Paul Motter]

This is true - I also read it on CNBC. That is a really big deal because Wall Street was fine with Obama and Trump. It is rare for "business" to warn against any candidate, but they know she is anti-bank, anti-business and also a wild-eyed socialist who will advocate for the Fed to print money. She is BAD NEWS for the economy.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is true - I also read it on CNBC. That is a really big deal because Wall Street was fine with Obama and Trump. It is rare for "business" to warn against any candidate, but they know she is anti-bank, anti-business and also a wild-eyed socialist who will advocate for the Fed to print money. She is BAD NEWS for the economy.

Or maybe she's good news for the Economy just bad news for Wall Street Blood Suckers.

 

[Paul Motter]

This is true - I also read it on CNBC. That is a really big deal because Wall Street was fine with Obama and Trump. It is rare for "business" to warn against any candidate, but they know she is anti-bank, anti-business and also a wild-eyed socialist who will advocate for the Fed to print money. She is BAD NEWS for the economy.

Or maybe she's good news for the Economy just bad news for Wall Street Blood Suckers.

I'm guessing you have never taken a class in economics. Right?

 

[Mike473]

This is true - I also read it on CNBC. That is a really big deal because Wall Street was fine with Obama and Trump. It is rare for "business" to warn against any candidate, but they know she is anti-bank, anti-business and also a wild-eyed socialist who will advocate for the Fed to print money. She is BAD NEWS for the economy.

Or maybe she's good news for the Economy just bad news for Wall Street Blood Suckers.

Don't underestimate Warren. She was able to score $400,000 to each one college course. That is a craft business person.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is true - I also read it on CNBC. That is a really big deal because Wall Street was fine with Obama and Trump. It is rare for "business" to warn against any candidate, but they know she is anti-bank, anti-business and also a wild-eyed socialist who will advocate for the Fed to print money. She is BAD NEWS for the economy.

Or maybe she's good news for the Economy just bad news for Wall Street Blood Suckers.

Don't underestimate Warren. She was able to score $400,000 to each one college course. That is a craft business person.

Right now, it's hard to take anything the Rumpsters say seriously. They are sniping from the shadows right now. And they don't have their handlers telling them what to do. Nothing in their script covers what is happening.

Did I vote for Nixon for his second term even with the Watergate looming over his head? You betcha. The alternatives were terrible. And Nixon only tried to cover up for some really brilliant but misguided people. It's called Collusion. He didn't have prior knowledge of the breakin. In fact, he had nothing to gain from it and everything to lose. And he ended up losing it all.

Rump ain't no Nixon who Nixon tried to salvage his really brilliant people. Rump destroys everything he touches sooner rather than later. Those ain't speed bumps that makes the Rump Bus bounce up and down, it's all the people that Rump keeps throwing under it. I didn't like Nixon but I respected him professionally.