Two Thumbs
Platinum Member
Another fucking retarded idea from the left . . . .
You used a bad word!!!!
--> Left
Left < - - - - -
"left" is a four letter word.
just sayin
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another fucking retarded idea from the left . . . .
You used a bad word!!!!
--> Left
Left < - - - - -
Whatt?
The Zoomer seems opposed to the law. You seem in favor of it.
Whattt?
Re-read what you just posted. You need another cup of coffee, George!
Marketers can sexualize girls at younger and younger ages, selling ever more revealing and sexy clothes, swim suits and the like to little girls, which in turn naturally draws more attention to them looking like little pole dancers or hookers, but OH NO, DON'T YOU DARE LOOK AT THEM!
Sheeeezuz freakin' Christ... this world is going insane.
What about peeping moms?
When my little guy (11) enters a public bathroom, I still stand just outside the door checking out every man who enters and exits. As a rule, I generally keep both eyes peeled for any creepers!
I agree that this is a stupid law but I'm shocked to find out that you look at children with sexual aggression. Though all those threads lying about the TSA groping children did make me wonder if you were protesting too much.All I can say is, WHAT THE FUCK?
Bill toughens law on visual sexual aggression against children in Maine | SeacoastOnline.comThose who peer at children in public could find themselves on the wrong side of the law in Maine soon.
A bill that passed the House last month aims to strengthen the crime of visual sexual aggression against children, according to state Rep. Dawn Hill, D-York.
Her involvement started when Ogunquit Police Lt. David Alexander was called to a local beach to deal with a man who appeared to be observing children entering the community bathrooms. Because the state statute prevents arrests for visual sexual aggression of a child in a public place, Alexander said he and his fellow officer could only ask the man to move along.
"There was no violation of law that we could enforce. There was nothing we could charge him with," Alexander said.
Remind me to stay out of Maine. I would hate to go to jail simply because I looked at a child with sexual aggression.
Why is he sitting next to a bathroom? Who does that?
I don't know that a law making it illegal to look is appropriate....I think there are already loitering laws that would work.
But any time you have a freak staking out bathrooms, you've got a problem. And I'm assuming that this guy was.
Of course this is the difference between me and most other people...I would have walked up to him and told him to quit ogling the kids and move his dumb ass. Not like I haven't done it before.
Somehow I doubt that was the case.
Here's the thing...children are our collective property, and our collective responsibility. We are, collectively, responsible for keeping them safe and secure.
That means discouraging random adults from just lurking around the fringes of places that children congregate. Maybe his motives were perfectly wonderful (I really doubt it) but the presence of random, purposeless adults lingering around places where kids congregate increases the risk to those kids. It adds to confusion, it provides true predators with cover.
So this is one of the ways we, as a society, protect our kids. We acknowledge that we don't want extra adults lurking around places where our kids are, and we discourage adults from engaging in that behavior. I'm sure it's a terrible blow to all the nice middle-aged men who like to hang around the bathrooms to get their fill of kids, but they'll survive.
What about peeping moms?
When my little guy (11) enters a public bathroom, I still stand just outside the door checking out every man who enters and exits. As a rule, I generally keep both eyes peeled for any creepers!