martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 85,209
- 35,697
- 2,300
Probably, but then again the hateful right probably does not know the difference between threats and dissent.Aren't there already "threat" statutes on the books?Here's the bill.Dissent is not necessarily a threat or harassmentNo more threats and harassment against public officials? Whatever will the hatemongers do now?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Threats and harassment of certain officials and property; venue. Provides that certain crimes relating to threats and harassment may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the victim is the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia. In addition, threats to damage property may be prosecuted in the City of Richmond if the property is owned by the Commonwealth and located in the Capitol District.
Don't see the word "dissent" anywhere.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
Coming from a side that disrupts speeches by those they disagree with, your hypocrisy reeks.