Vegas "Democrat Debate" Comedy Show

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2006
10,025
2,410
290
San Diego, CA
Tonight's Democrat Debate comedy show will probably have more subjects the moderators are not allowed to ask about, than at any time since the Russians successfully defended Stalingrad.

--------------------------------------------------------

Vegas Comedy Show

Vegas Comedy Show

A scandal-plagued front-runner prepares to take the stage.

by James Taranto
Oct. 13, 2015 2:10 p.m. ET

National Journal humor columnist Ron Fournier gets off to a slow start in his preview of tonight’s debate between inevitable Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders. Fournier goes through the motions of offering “advice” to the three nobodies who’ll also appear—Lincoln Mercury and those guys—and while the concept is funny it’s difficult to keep the joke going. But his advice to Mrs. Clinton is comedy gold:

---------------------------------
Tell the truth. Your apology for causing confusion about your use of private email on the job rang hollow because your wrongdoing is clear: You stashed official email on a covert server, an act that subverted the Freedom of Information Act, thwarted legislative oversight, and jeopardized U.S. secrets. It violated federal rules in place while you headed the State Department. So, please, don’t say it was “above board.” Don’t claim you turned over all your work-related email. Don’t pretend you didn’t traffic U.S. secrets over a home-brewed server. We know those are lies. Don’t cite phony precedents. Don’t blame the GOP or the media. Credibility and accountability are gateways to leadership. So, please, just tell us: What were you hiding?

If your answer is nothing, tell the FBI to make public your deleted email—everything that isn’t absolutely personal. We need to see your email because you’ve made it impossible to take your word.

---------------------------------

The idea of somebody under investigation barking orders at the FBI—“Make the evidence public! Stat!”—is both original and hilarious. In real life, the FBI has already refused a judge’s request that it cooperate with the State Department in recovering wrongfully deleted public records.

The idea that Mrs. Clinton should “tell the truth” is, of course, a hoary old gag—but it’s one that gets funnier with each telling as its implausibility grows. And Fournier’s timing is brilliant. His column came out yesterday, to be followed this morning by a lengthy investigation by Politico’s Glenn Thrush and Annie Karni, who inform us that a member of Mrs. Clinton’s inner circle offered her the same “advice” months ago:

----------------------------------
The wiry and wily John Podesta, [Mrs.] Clinton’s campaign chairman, thought right away that she needed to dump everything out in public as quickly as possible to avoid the deadly drip-drip-drip. “We need to throw the facts to the dogs, and let ’em chew on it,” Podesta told the candidate. But Clinton’s answer—and that of her lawyer David Kendall and her former State Department chief of staff Cheryl Mills—was a “no” when Podesta and other advisers asked for some details. Foggy Bottom needed to review the emails, they were told, and besides, half of them, the ones deemed “personal,” had already been deleted.
----------------------------------

Apparently they thought Podesta was serious. Folks, you can’t make this stuff up. Thrush and Karni quote a straight man, identified only as “an aide,” asking Kendall: “Why does the other side always know more than we do?” On Twitter, intel expert John Schindler supplies the punch line: “Maybe insecure email?”

Even Barack Obama is getting in on the humor. “I can tell you that this is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered,” he deadpanned in a CBS interview, quoted by Politico. The Associated Press fires back that Mrs. Clinton’s homebrew server “was connected to the Internet in ways that made it more vulnerable to hackers while using software that could have been exploited”:

----------------------------------
Clinton’s server, which handled her personal and State Department correspondence, appeared to allow users to connect openly over the Internet to control it remotely, according to detailed records compiled in 2012. Experts said the Microsoft remote desktop service wasn’t intended for such use without additional protective measures, and was the subject of U.S. government and industry warnings at the time over attacks from even low-skilled intruders.

Records show that Clinton additionally operated two more devices on her home network in Chappaqua, New York, that also were directly accessible from the Internet. One contained similar remote-control software that also has suffered from security vulnerabilities, known as Virtual Network Computing, and the other appeared to be configured to run websites.

----------------------------------

David Burge on Twitter shows a graphic of the Microsoft’s animated paper clip offering assistance: “It looks like you’re trying to avoid federal email laws. Would you like me to help?” Then the bulleted choices: “Wipe hard drive,” “Ask Huma to fetch tea,” “Find NPR stations.”

(The last two are actual technical challenges that beset Mrs. Clinton during her tenure as secretary of state. As for the paper clip, if you’re too young to recognize the reference, count your blessings.)
 
Last edited:
If anyone is bored enough to actually watch this, I have a can of paint you can watch dry instead. That will be much more worthy of your time...
 
If anyone is bored enough to actually watch this, I have a can of paint you can watch dry instead. That will be much more worthy of your time...
But the bagger debates. Well, that is another story entirely.

Its a train wreck, and you just have to look. Nothing is more entertaining than a couple of hours of watching the passengers in the KKKlown KKKar --- led by the master of the 3 ring circus, trump --- fight to win craziest person on stage for the evening.

Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs,
Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs
 
I think the only people not watching the playoffs will be the Republican fans of Hillary Clinton.
Yup Kershaw on the mound to save the season? No way I'm missing that.

HE WILL BE DEFEATED!!!!
Probably!

reggie-miller-choke-o.gif
 
I like how Hillary is considered "scandal plagued" even though the "scandals" have never turned anything up. The GOP's minions have done their job well.
No assaults, thefts, frauds, or murders were ever proven against Al Capone when he went to jail, either.

That must mean he's innocent of them, eh?

(You can't make this stuff up, folks!) :eusa_dance:
 
I like how Hillary is considered "scandal plagued" even though the "scandals" have never turned anything up. The GOP's minions have done their job well.
No assaults, thefts, frauds, or murders were ever proven against Al Capone when he went to jail, either.

That must mean he's innocent of them, eh?

(You can't make this stuff up, folks!) :eusa_dance:

Capone faced a court of law, where as Clinton has been tried in a 100% partisan witch hunt.
What a dumb ass comparison, junior!
 
I like how Hillary is considered "scandal plagued" even though the "scandals" have never turned anything up. The GOP's minions have done their job well.
No assaults, thefts, frauds, or murders were ever proven against Al Capone when he went to jail, either.

That must mean he's innocent of them, eh?

(You can't make this stuff up, folks!) :eusa_dance:

Capone faced a court of law, where as Clinton has been tried in a 100% partisan witch hunt.
What a dumb ass comparison, junior!
I couldn't agree more.
 
I like how Hillary is considered "scandal plagued" even though the "scandals" have never turned anything up. The GOP's minions have done their job well.
No assaults, thefts, frauds, or murders were ever proven against Al Capone when he went to jail, either.

That must mean he's innocent of them, eh?

(You can't make this stuff up, folks!) :eusa_dance:

Capone faced a court of law, where as Clinton has been tried in a 100% partisan witch hunt.
What a dumb ass comparison, junior!
How many times did they TRY and get Capone before they got him?
And they got him on something they were NOT even trying for from the start.
 
Egads, I've never seen so many Democrap cum-catchers here in town at one time.......it's semi-frightening! (Halloween came early this year....).
 
I like how Hillary is considered "scandal plagued" even though the "scandals" have never turned anything up. The GOP's minions have done their job well.
No assaults, thefts, frauds, or murders were ever proven against Al Capone when he went to jail, either.

That must mean he's innocent of them, eh?

(You can't make this stuff up, folks!) :eusa_dance:

Capone faced a court of law, where as Clinton has been tried in a 100% partisan witch hunt.
What a dumb ass comparison, junior!
How many times did they TRY and get Capone before they got him?
And they got him on something they were NOT even trying for from the start.
They weren't making shit up about Capone for simple political reasons.
 
"Mrs Clinton, how do you survive every day knowing that Republicans are plotting to bring you down by whatever means possible?"
"Mr Sanders, do you believe college should be for everyone or just rich white men?"
Yeah we'll see it.
 
I like how Hillary is considered "scandal plagued" even though the "scandals" have never turned anything up. The GOP's minions have done their job well.
No assaults, thefts, frauds, or murders were ever proven against Al Capone when he went to jail, either.

That must mean he's innocent of them, eh?

(You can't make this stuff up, folks!) :eusa_dance:
(You can't make this stuff up, folks!)
And yet...
 

Forum List

Back
Top