Vanishing Glaciers Of The Greater Himalaya - Photographic evidence

Hate to throw cold water on yet another dopey Rolling Thunder thread but.........it after all is my duty............

October 1, 2011
Green Energy Industry Staggers


As the Energy Department hustled to get another $4.7 billion in loan guarantees for green tech companies out the door before time ran out and the program ended last week, yet another solar panel manufacturer was wilting in the sun, and the green jobs scam was looking more threadbare than ever. Says the WSJ:

Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction permits from the Obama administration.

The filing is the latest in a string of U.S. solar company bankruptcies, as soft global demand for solar power, falling prices and a glut of solar panels from Asia have hammered manufacturers.

Surprise, surprise: the American “green energy” industry faces much the same problems as everyone else in this economy. Solar firms still have to compete with Chinese labor (and massive Chinese government subsidies further enhanced by cheap Chinese currency).

But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.

The Solyndra guarantee and related programs were all developed back in the heady early days of the Obama administrations when delusional greens thought their global agenda was on the verge of being realized. Cap and trade and other aggressive energy policies would artificially jack up energy prices in the US to the point where demand for solar and other alternative energy would grow. The global carbon treaty would provide a permanent source of demand for green energy.

The political assumptions underlying the green investment boomlet turned out to be false. There will be no global carbon regime for the foreseeable future; there will be no cap and trade and no aggressive federal programs to raise energy prices during the deepest recession since World War Two.

Perhaps even worse from the green point of view, a cascade of discoveries and technological advances has dramatically increased the supplies of oil and gas in the western hemisphere — including huge new domestic energy supplies in places like Pennsylvania, Ohio and upstate New York. These discoveries are devastating to the politics of the environmental movement.


Green Energy Industry Staggers | Via Meadia






Like Ive been saying...........these ongoing debates about ice and temperatures is an exercise akin to group navel contemplation. The posts I throw up are the only posts which bring an objective truth..............which obstensibly means.......... Im winning.

Its 2011..........its time for everybody to wake up and smell the maple nut crunch. Zero money + zero political will = climate change debate is a debate nobody cares about except those who's personal lives are in need of a beer and a plan.
 
Last edited:
Hate to throw cold water on yet another dopey Rolling Thunder thread but.........it after all is my duty............

October 1, 2011
Green Energy Industry Staggers

As the Energy Department hustled to get another $4.7 billion in loan guarantees for green tech companies out the door before time ran out and the program ended last week, yet another solar panel manufacturer was wilting in the sun, and the green jobs scam was looking more threadbare than ever. Says the WSJ:

Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction permits from the Obama administration.

The filing is the latest in a string of U.S. solar company bankruptcies, as soft global demand for solar power, falling prices and a glut of solar panels from Asia have hammered manufacturers.

Surprise, surprise: the American “green energy” industry faces much the same problems as everyone else in this economy. Solar firms still have to compete with Chinese labor (and massive Chinese government subsidies further enhanced by cheap Chinese currency).

But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.

The Solyndra guarantee and related programs were all developed back in the heady early days of the Obama administrations when delusional greens thought their global agenda was on the verge of being realized. Cap and trade and other aggressive energy policies would artificially jack up energy prices in the US to the point where demand for solar and other alternative energy would grow. The global carbon treaty would provide a permanent source of demand for green energy.

The political assumptions underlying the green investment boomlet turned out to be false. There will be no global carbon regime for the foreseeable future; there will be no cap and trade and no aggressive federal programs to raise energy prices during the deepest recession since World War Two.

Perhaps even worse from the green point of view, a cascade of discoveries and technological advances has dramatically increased the supplies of oil and gas in the western hemisphere — including huge new domestic energy supplies in places like Pennsylvania, Ohio and upstate New York. These discoveries are devastating to the politics of the environmental movement.


Green Energy Industry Staggers | Via Meadia

Like Ive been saying...........these ongoing debates about ice and temperatures is an exercise akin to group navel contemplation. The posts I throw up are the only posts which bring an objective truth..............which obstensibly(sic) means.......... Im winning.

Its 2011..........its time for everybody to wake up and smell the maple nut crunch. Zero money + zero political will = climate change debate is a debate nobody cares about except those who's personal lives are in need of a beer and a plan.

I guess it's not too surprising that a clueless retard like you, kookster, would insert some garbage pro-oil opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal concerning global solar markets and green energy into a thread whose topic is the melting of the Himalayan glaciers due to anthropogenic global warming, and think it has some significance or relevance. You poor, poor retard, you're just plain too stupid to get it. The climate changes the world is going through will continue to occur and have real world consequences entirely independent from mankind's transient economic market fluctuations. Continuing with a business as usual course with fossil fuels and ever increasing CO2 emissions is a path to world destruction. We will either make the transition to non polluting renewable energy sources or we will kill ourselves and the planet by being too stupid collectively to both face the reality of the mistakes we've made and to do better.

You, as usual, have no idea what is going on.

Nor do the stooges at the WSJ....

World Renewable Energy Demand To Surge, Costs To Fall, Says UN Report

Japan To Ditch More Nuclear Power And Develop Renewables Instead

China Increases Renewable Energy Goals, Again

Renewables are the World’s Fastest-Growing Energy Source

September 20, 2011
 
as always, the problem is attribution. the global temp has gone up less than 1K in the last 100+ years, much of that before significant manmade CO2 rise. glaciers and ice packs have shrunk and grown many times in the past according to their own schedule. warmers try to lay all the blame at the feet of mankind for burning fossil fuels but they are far from proving even the CO2 contribution with any certainty, and are even less certain of the other factors both known and unknown. I am all for continued study but I am against crippling our economy and cutting the quality of life in the hope that CO2 is the ultimate climate control knob, and more importantly, that we can control it in any meaningful way.
 
Hate to throw cold water on yet another dopey Rolling Thunder thread but.........it after all is my duty............

October 1, 2011
Green Energy Industry Staggers

As the Energy Department hustled to get another $4.7 billion in loan guarantees for green tech companies out the door before time ran out and the program ended last week, yet another solar panel manufacturer was wilting in the sun, and the green jobs scam was looking more threadbare than ever. Says the WSJ:

Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction permits from the Obama administration.

The filing is the latest in a string of U.S. solar company bankruptcies, as soft global demand for solar power, falling prices and a glut of solar panels from Asia have hammered manufacturers.

Surprise, surprise: the American “green energy” industry faces much the same problems as everyone else in this economy. Solar firms still have to compete with Chinese labor (and massive Chinese government subsidies further enhanced by cheap Chinese currency).

But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.

The Solyndra guarantee and related programs were all developed back in the heady early days of the Obama administrations when delusional greens thought their global agenda was on the verge of being realized. Cap and trade and other aggressive energy policies would artificially jack up energy prices in the US to the point where demand for solar and other alternative energy would grow. The global carbon treaty would provide a permanent source of demand for green energy.

The political assumptions underlying the green investment boomlet turned out to be false. There will be no global carbon regime for the foreseeable future; there will be no cap and trade and no aggressive federal programs to raise energy prices during the deepest recession since World War Two.

Perhaps even worse from the green point of view, a cascade of discoveries and technological advances has dramatically increased the supplies of oil and gas in the western hemisphere — including huge new domestic energy supplies in places like Pennsylvania, Ohio and upstate New York. These discoveries are devastating to the politics of the environmental movement.


Green Energy Industry Staggers | Via Meadia

Like Ive been saying...........these ongoing debates about ice and temperatures is an exercise akin to group navel contemplation. The posts I throw up are the only posts which bring an objective truth..............which obstensibly(sic) means.......... Im winning.

Its 2011..........its time for everybody to wake up and smell the maple nut crunch. Zero money + zero political will = climate change debate is a debate nobody cares about except those who's personal lives are in need of a beer and a plan.

I guess it's not too surprising that a clueless retard like you, kookster, would insert some garbage pro-oil opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal concerning global solar markets and green energy into a thread whose topic is the melting of the Himalayan glaciers due to anthropogenic global warming, and think it has some significance or relevance. You poor, poor retard, you're just plain too stupid to get it. The climate changes the world is going through will continue to occur and have real world consequences entirely independent from mankind's transient economic market fluctuations. Continuing with a business as usual course with fossil fuels and ever increasing CO2 emissions is a path to world destruction. We will either make the transition to non polluting renewable energy sources or we will kill ourselves and the planet by being too stupid collectively to both face the reality of the mistakes we've made and to do better.

You, as usual, have no idea what is going on.

Nor do the stooges at the WSJ....

World Renewable Energy Demand To Surge, Costs To Fall, Says UN Report

Japan To Ditch More Nuclear Power And Develop Renewables Instead

China Increases Renewable Energy Goals, Again

Renewables are the World’s Fastest-Growing Energy Source

September 20, 2011



The k00ks on this particular forum keep me coming back!! A gift that keeps on giving!! k00ks always think that wishing hard enough about something makes it happen.......as if the vast minority holds any sway on public policy.

The majority, thankfully, know that when you cant pay your mortgage, you cant go buy that high end Mercedes. In the world of the k00ks however, anything is possible.........of course, they have the political IQ's of a small soap dish!!:boobies::boobies::boobies::coffee:



Its good to be the clueless retard king!!!:rock::rock::rock:
 
Last edited:
Hate to throw cold water on yet another dopey Rolling Thunder thread but.........it after all is my duty............

October 1, 2011
Green Energy Industry Staggers

As the Energy Department hustled to get another $4.7 billion in loan guarantees for green tech companies out the door before time ran out and the program ended last week, yet another solar panel manufacturer was wilting in the sun, and the green jobs scam was looking more threadbare than ever. Says the WSJ:

Solar-power equipment manufacturer Stirling Energy Systems Inc. has filed for bankruptcy, adding to a wave of troubles in the solar industry amid soft demand, falling prices and difficulty raising money. [… ] Both [of the company’s plants] were sited on public land in California and obtained fast-track construction permits from the Obama administration.

The filing is the latest in a string of U.S. solar company bankruptcies, as soft global demand for solar power, falling prices and a glut of solar panels from Asia have hammered manufacturers.

Surprise, surprise: the American “green energy” industry faces much the same problems as everyone else in this economy. Solar firms still have to compete with Chinese labor (and massive Chinese government subsidies further enhanced by cheap Chinese currency).

But there’s another factor behind the failure of so many Obama administration initiatives in this field. Because alternative energy generation is expensive and inefficient, it requires some combination of subsidies, high energy prices and forced purchases to make these investments pay off.

The Solyndra guarantee and related programs were all developed back in the heady early days of the Obama administrations when delusional greens thought their global agenda was on the verge of being realized. Cap and trade and other aggressive energy policies would artificially jack up energy prices in the US to the point where demand for solar and other alternative energy would grow. The global carbon treaty would provide a permanent source of demand for green energy.

The political assumptions underlying the green investment boomlet turned out to be false. There will be no global carbon regime for the foreseeable future; there will be no cap and trade and no aggressive federal programs to raise energy prices during the deepest recession since World War Two.

Perhaps even worse from the green point of view, a cascade of discoveries and technological advances has dramatically increased the supplies of oil and gas in the western hemisphere — including huge new domestic energy supplies in places like Pennsylvania, Ohio and upstate New York. These discoveries are devastating to the politics of the environmental movement.


Green Energy Industry Staggers | Via Meadia

Like Ive been saying...........these ongoing debates about ice and temperatures is an exercise akin to group navel contemplation. The posts I throw up are the only posts which bring an objective truth..............which obstensibly(sic) means.......... Im winning.

Its 2011..........its time for everybody to wake up and smell the maple nut crunch. Zero money + zero political will = climate change debate is a debate nobody cares about except those who's personal lives are in need of a beer and a plan.

I guess it's not too surprising that a clueless retard like you, kookster, would insert some garbage pro-oil opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal concerning global solar markets and green energy into a thread whose topic is the melting of the Himalayan glaciers due to anthropogenic global warming, and think it has some significance or relevance. You poor, poor retard, you're just plain too stupid to get it. The climate changes the world is going through will continue to occur and have real world consequences entirely independent from mankind's transient economic market fluctuations. Continuing with a business as usual course with fossil fuels and ever increasing CO2 emissions is a path to world destruction. We will either make the transition to non polluting renewable energy sources or we will kill ourselves and the planet by being too stupid collectively to both face the reality of the mistakes we've made and to do better.

You, as usual, have no idea what is going on.

Nor do the stooges at the WSJ....

World Renewable Energy Demand To Surge, Costs To Fall, Says UN Report

Japan To Ditch More Nuclear Power And Develop Renewables Instead

China Increases Renewable Energy Goals, Again

Renewables are the World’s Fastest-Growing Energy Source

September 20, 2011

the melting of the Himalayan glaciers due to anthropogenic global warming

How much is due to fossil fuels, how much due to other sources of CO2 and how much due to solar or other natural fluctuations?
 
There are no other comparable sources of CO2, mankind puts out over 100 times as much as volcanoes, the ocean both emits and obsorbs CO2, and, at present, is absorbing more than it is emitting. We are the source of the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere, and until the Arctic permafrost and clathrates kick in, will remain so.

The solar TSI is still lower than it has been for the last 50 years. Rising, but still lower.

The sun is the sole source of surface heat for our planet. Atmospheric retention of that heat due to GHGs is the factor that keeps our oceans from being frozen down to the equator. We have added 40% more CO2, and 150% more CH4, plus numerous industrial GHGs that have no natural analog, some of which are thousands of times as potent a GHG as CO2.

The warming we are experiancing is a creation of our own making.
 
Its good to be the clueless retard king!!!

And there you have it! The kookster is, by his own admission, the king of the clueless retards.

Of course, anyone reading this forum already knew that but it is very funny that he is actually stupid enough to admit it.
 
as always, the problem is attribution. the global temp has gone up less than 1K in the last 100+ years, much of that before significant manmade CO2 rise. glaciers and ice packs have shrunk and grown many times in the past according to their own schedule. warmers try to lay all the blame at the feet of mankind for burning fossil fuels but they are far from proving even the CO2 contribution with any certainty, and are even less certain of the other factors both known and unknown. I am all for continued study but I am against crippling our economy and cutting the quality of life in the hope that CO2 is the ultimate climate control knob, and more importantly, that we can control it in any meaningful way.

I totally agree. The glaciers on Mt. Rainier are not melting. The ocean currents determine much of the climate. We on the west coast are in for another La Nina this year which means colder than normal.

If man burning fossil fuels has caused global warming, then what caused the end of the ice age thousands of years ago when there was no "man" and no burning of fossil fuels. Wouldn't it stand to reason that man is NOT the cause of this. If we could control the climate, well I think we are doing a damn poor job of it. I want hot summers and cold winters, thank you, and I got cold winter, but a cold summer, too. If humans can control climate, what took them so long to bring rain to Texas?

NOAA La Niña Page
 
Oh, looky here, trolling blunder giving us more alarmist horse crap, how original, as usual the truth is quite different, not that a incompetent twit like blunder would know the difference:lol::lol::lol:

As usual, the IPCC is full of shit.

Himalayan glaciers advancing, despite global warming’
Charu Sudan Kasturi, Hindustan Times
New Delhi, January 25, 2011 Email to Author

First Published: 18:54 IST(25/1/2011)
Last Updated: 23:29 IST(25/1/2011)Share more...10 Comments Email print

Several glaciers in the greater Himalayas are either advancing or are stable, American and German researchers have found, corroborating India's stand against a controversial prediction by the UN's climate change agency that the glaciers would vanish by 2030. More than 50% of the glaciers in the Karakoram region of the northwest Himalayas are stable or are advancing, the scientists have reported in this week's Nature Geoscience journal.

Dirk Scherler and Manfred Strecker from Potsdam University, Germany and Bodo Bookhagen from the University of California Santa Barbara used remoter sensing images to track frontal changes and surface velocities of glaciers in the greater Himalaya between 2000 and 2008.

They found wide variations in the response of glaciers in the different parts of the Himalayas to climate change.

The research paper argues that the variations are a result of differences in the debris cover enjoyed by different glaciers – a factor that has so far been neglected while studying the impact of climate change on glaciers.

The scientists found that while more than 65% of all Himalayan glaciers studied were retreating, the glaciers in the Tibetan plateau, where debris cover is largely absent, are retreating fastest.

Glaciers in the central Himalaya region are relatively better covered by debris and typically have stable fronts, the scientists argued.

But possibly the most surprising finding of the research relates to the Karakoram region, where more than half the glaciers are stable or are even advancing.

The findings support India's opposition to claims by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – the UN's climate change agency -- in 2008 of the Himalayan glaciers disappearing.

Indian scientists had countered the IPCC claims by presenting their own data that suggested that any impact of climate change on the Himalayan glaciers was far more subtle and complicated than the IPCC had suggested.



http://www.hindustantimes.com/Himal...espite-global-warming/H1-Article1-654581.aspx
 
Oh, looky here, trolling blunder giving us more alarmist horse crap, how original, as usual the truth is quite different, not that a incompetent twit like blunder would know the difference

As usual, the IPCC is full of shit.

Himalayan glaciers advancing, despite global warming’
Charu Sudan Kasturi, Hindustan Times
New Delhi, January 25, 2011 Email to Author

First Published: 25/1/2011

Several glaciers in the greater Himalayas are either advancing or are stable, American and German researchers have found, corroborating India's stand against a controversial prediction by the UN's climate change agency that the glaciers would vanish by 2030. More than 50% of the glaciers in the Karakoram region of the northwest Himalayas are stable or are advancing, the scientists have reported in this week's Nature Geoscience journal.

Dirk Scherler and Manfred Strecker from Potsdam University, Germany and Bodo Bookhagen from the University of California Santa Barbara used remoter sensing images to track frontal changes and surface velocities of glaciers in the greater Himalaya between 2000 and 2008.

They found wide variations in the response of glaciers in the different parts of the Himalayas to climate change.

The research paper argues that the variations are a result of differences in the debris cover enjoyed by different glaciers – a factor that has so far been neglected while studying the impact of climate change on glaciers.

The scientists found that while more than 65% of all Himalayan glaciers studied were retreating, the glaciers in the Tibetan plateau, where debris cover is largely absent, are retreating fastest.

Glaciers in the central Himalaya region are relatively better covered by debris and typically have stable fronts, the scientists argued.

But possibly the most surprising finding of the research relates to the Karakoram region, where more than half the glaciers are stable or are even advancing.

The findings support India's opposition to claims by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – the UN's climate change agency -- in 2008 of the Himalayan glaciers disappearing.

Indian scientists had countered the IPCC claims by presenting their own data that suggested that any impact of climate change on the Himalayan glaciers was far more subtle and complicated than the IPCC had suggested.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Himal...espite-global-warming/H1-Article1-654581.aspx

As usual, walleyed, you are full of shit.

Some key quotes from that article that the walleyedretard is a bit too stupid to understand.

"Several glaciers in the greater Himalayas are either advancing or are stable"

"They found wide variations in the response of glaciers in the different parts of the Himalayas to climate change. The research paper argues that the variations are a result of differences in the debris cover enjoyed by different glaciers..."

"The scientists found that while more than 65% of all Himalayan glaciers studied were retreating, the glaciers in the Tibetan plateau, where debris cover is largely absent, are retreating fastest."



And here some different and more complete reporting of that same article from the Nature Geoscience journal.

CLIMATE CHANGE: Not all Himalayan glaciers are melting

JOHANNESBURG, 27 January 2011 (IRIN) - A new study shows that while some glaciers in the Karakoram region of the northwestern Himalayas, which feed the River Indus, are stable, more than 65 percent of the glaciers fed by monsoons in the central Himalayas are melting.

"Our study shows that there is no uniform response of the Himalayan glaciers to climate change," said Dirk Scherler, one of three researchers who produced the study published in the current edition of Nature Geoscience, a monthly journal.

Scherler and one of his co-researchers, Manfred Strecker, are at the Institute of Earth and Environmental Science at the University Potsdam, Germany, while the third, Bodo Bookhagen, is at the University of California.

"The glaciers [in the Karakoram] might not be melting for a number of reasons… precipitation, cloudiness - it is difficult to say." Moisture brought by the monsoon falls as snow and forms ice, building the glaciers.

The three-year study, one of the first to cover a large area of the Hindu Kush-Himalaya region - sometimes referred to as the Third Pole because it has the largest expanse of frozen water outside of the Polar Regions - looked at remotely sensed changes at the front of the glaciers, and their surface velocities between 2000 and 2008.

Information on the state and behaviour of the region’s glaciers is critical because they feed 10 rivers that provide water to 20 percent of the world's population. Changes in glacier ice or snow-melt affect the glacier’s storage capacity, and the flow of water downstream.

Most scientists acknowledge that rising global temperatures mean more work needs to be done on the Third Pole region, as not enough is known about glaciers.

Read more
TAJIKISTAN: Melting glaciers pose growing threat in the Pamirs
NEPAL: Global warming swells glacial lakes, endangering thousands
NEPAL: Mountain communities fear melting glaciers, flooding
video -Melting Glaciers

A joint study from 1999 to 2003 by the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), a Nepal-based research centre supported by eight governments in the region, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), and the Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN), documented about 15,000 glaciers and 9,000 glacial lakes in Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan and selected basins in China and India.

Scherler said they had studied 40 glaciers in an area of about 3,000sq km in the Karakoram. "It is a small area if you consider the fact that the entire ice-covered area, according to one estimate, in the Karakoram region is about 16,000 square kilometres."

Monsoon-influenced glaciers have been retreating in the central rugged Himalayan region. The researchers found that debris from the mountains was choking the flow of water into a number of glaciers, which was not a good sign. Scherler said there was a need to study the debris so as to understand the demise of glaciers.

A number of studies between 1999 and 2001 have backed the link between climate change and glacier melting. "The Himalayan glaciers have retreated by approximately a kilometre since the Little Ice Age [from 1350 to 1900]," said a joint study by ICIMOD and UNEP.

"Himalayan glaciers are retreating at rates ranging from 10m to 60m per year, and many small glaciers (less than 0.2sq km) have already disappeared."


A sustained glacier retreat will increase the volume of water in rivers, and also sediments, which can choke water supply, affecting agriculture.

When glaciers retreat, lakes commonly form behind the newly exposed debris - soil and rock called a moraine - carried along by the front edge of the ice wall. The ICIMOD/UNEP study said the rapid accumulation of water in these lakes could lead to a sudden breach of the moraine dam, causing a possibly catastrophic glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF).

In the recent past, Nepal alone has been affected by 21 GLOF events, and 200 potentially dangerous glacial lakes have been documented across the Himalayan region.


Copyright © IRIN 2011. All rights reserved - Terms and Conditions of Use - The reproduction of unaltered IRIN material, with attribution (see below), and for non-commercial purposes is permitted subject to these supplementary terms and conditions: LIMITED COMMERCIAL USE - Republication of IRIN Materials in newspapers and magazines, media-related and other non-subscription web sites is permitted, with proper attribution

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
 
Last edited:
as always, the problem is attribution. the global temp has gone up less than 1K in the last 100+ years, much of that before significant manmade CO2 rise. glaciers and ice packs have shrunk and grown many times in the past according to their own schedule. warmers try to lay all the blame at the feet of mankind for burning fossil fuels but they are far from proving even the CO2 contribution with any certainty, and are even less certain of the other factors both known and unknown. I am all for continued study but I am against crippling our economy and cutting the quality of life in the hope that CO2 is the ultimate climate control knob, and more importantly, that we can control it in any meaningful way.

I totally agree. The glaciers on Mt. Rainier are not melting. The ocean currents determine much of the climate. We on the west coast are in for another La Nina this year which means colder than normal.

If man burning fossil fuels has caused global warming, then what caused the end of the ice age thousands of years ago when there was no "man" and no burning of fossil fuels. Wouldn't it stand to reason that man is NOT the cause of this. If we could control the climate, well I think we are doing a damn poor job of it. I want hot summers and cold winters, thank you, and I got cold winter, but a cold summer, too. If humans can control climate, what took them so long to bring rain to Texas?

NOAA La Niña Page

The glaciers of Mt. Rainier are not melting? Are you daft? Or just blind?

Mt. Rainier's retreating glaciers are making a mess - CSMonitor.com

The fallout from Mt. Rainier's shrinking glaciers is beginning to roll downhill, and nowhere is the impact more striking than on the volcano's west side.

"This is it in spades," says Park Service geologist Paul Kennard, scrambling up a 10-foot-tall mass of dirt and boulders bulldozed back just enough to clear the road.

As receding glaciers expose crumbly slopes, vast amounts of gravel and sediment are being sluiced into the rivers that flow from the Northwest's tallest peak. Much of the material sweeps down in rain-driven slurries called debris flows, like those that repeatedly have slammed Mt. Rainier National Park's Westside Road.

"The rivers are filling up with stuff," Mr. Kennard says from his vantage point atop the pile. He pointed out ancient stands of fir and cedar now up to their knees in water.

Inside park boundaries, rivers choked with gravel are threatening to spill across roads, bump up against the bottom of bridges and flood the historic complex at Longmire

Now Bozo, have you ever heard of the Milankovic Cycles? Or doing a bit of research before demonstrating to the world the depths of your ignorance.
 
I'll go with Indian sources for things happening in India over your proven lying sources any day of the week. Remember MENSA BOY once a liar allways a liar and the IPCC has been lying through their ass! No wonder you suck them off all the time.
 
Anthropogenic global warming is melting the world's glaciers at increasing rates. This poses some grave dangers to the vast populations around the world who are dependent on glacial melt water feeding into the river systems as a supply of water for drinking and agriculture in the dry summer months. The glaciers of the Himalayas are mostly shrinking rapidly and these glaciers are the source of water for hundreds of millions of people in India and China. Some mountaineer photographers recently took current photos of many glaciers from the same spots that photos were taken many decades ago, showing the changes in the ice very clearly. Take a look.

Rivers of ice: Vanishing glaciers
Stunning images from high in the Himalayas - showing the extent by which many glaciers have shrunk in the past 80 years or so - have gone on display at the Royal Geographical Society in central London.

10 October 2011

Wait a minute... Your article states that glaciers melting due to AGW is causing a shortage of water??????

How the hell is more meaning less? What kind of messed up twisted bleeding heart "its bad cause i said so" anti-logic is that? If the ice melts it makes more water. What is it suddenly not going to create more ice in winter?

Blunder your links continue to go down... Why in the hell do you keep posting links from third party aggregating software? Are you aware the actual use of those is to go to the site and actually link it there if you want to link to it? The reason being the long list of redirects it takes to get to it through the software makes the link generated for it unstable. In other words if you link to it through third party software like you do, it has to go through all kinds of added hyperlinks, ads, spyware, and other garbage to get there, and just one of those links times out and it fails.. Got it?

here is the way your link looks in text.

"http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence.html&v=1&libid=1318560941164&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld-south-asia-15216875&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Rivers%20of%20ice%3A%20Vanishing%20glaciers&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13185609700192"

just look at that shit... Where the hell is it going? who the hell knows. why doesn't it go directly to the site? Because people like you want to use a piece of spyware, web tracking garbage to do your work for you rather than go and look and post it for yourself. Lazy assholes can't even post a simple link on their own..

For a visual difference.. here is a link straight to it in text

"www.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld-south-asia"

and your link in text...

"http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=773&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F189019-vanishing-glaciers-of-the-greater-himalaya-photographic-evidence.html&v=1&libid=1318560941164&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld-south-asia-15216875&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fenvironment%2F&title=Vanishing%20Glaciers%20Of%20The%20Greater%20Himalaya%20-%20Photographic%20evidence%20-%20US%20Message%20Board%20-%20Political%20Discussion%20Forum&txt=Rivers%20of%20ice%3A%20Vanishing%20glaciers&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13185609700192"

See the difference? Damn dude, stop being so damn lazy..

Now fix it and stop using that software its garbage.

Actual link BBC News - Rivers of ice: Vanishing glaciers

That one is reliable and stable going straight to the article.. I will be back with a detailed ass whuppin for this later..
 
Told ya id be back with a detailed ass whuppin...

Here goes...

What time of year did they go there? Was it winter, spring, summer or fall? And why was that link to a video and not a full article? The link you sent us too was bloated with redirects I found the video on the bbc.uk news site you supposedly linked to. fact is ya didn't link to it, you linked to some other assholes interpretation of it...

Got an explanation for that? No didn't think so... Fact is you don't even actually know what it was and didn't bother to check you just grab a bunch pro AGW headlines and synopses from a aggregation tool and post to a bunch of web forums like a Greenpeace automaton..

You and your bullshit is now my pet project... I am going to watch you and your clones closely from now on. Every time I catch you posting this way here, I will make sure people realize what kind of mindless forum robot you are... Best get off your lazy cheetoh-eating moms basement dwelling ass and post with some integrity because i will point it out when you don't...
 

Forum List

Back
Top