Liability
Locked Account.
Personally insulting someone may make you feel better, but it doesn't help you win an argument. In fact, if you use such a tactic and are proven wrong, it makes you look like a moron.
I insulted you? OH poor boo-boo. I realize that offends you, you hypocritcial gasbag. I mean all you did was to stupidly and baselessly argue that I was somehow "unAmerican." Fuck off. You hypocrites deserve no quarter.
Completely irrelevant since I had not ever said, suggested or implied that the supporters should be barred from expressing their insipid "feelings." It's not my fault that you cannot read or comprehend uncomplicated English sentences, you moron.
Pretty weak. The last one was in the 3rd Circuit. Libs widely expected something new. They didn't get it of course. The SCOTUS DID reject the appeal from the 3rd Circuit determination. Prior to the 3rd Circuit, of course, the case had already run its course through the State appeals process. I guess you just missed ALL the news.
Wow. That's a very insightful revelation. Thanks for sharing it.
And it certainly doesn't make it right to try to stop them from exercising their FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to speak out for what they feel is right.
Good information. And if you stumble upon anybody who HAS argued that those morons shouldn't have freedom of speech to make their ignorant claims, let us all know. So far, however, the closest you've come seems to be to be your stupid, incoherent and erroneous effort to make that allegation against me.
[Insipid but hypocritical blather about etiquette snipped]
Be that as it may...
The point of this entire conversation was NOT whether Mr Mumia is guilty or innocent. As I stated, I personally do not believe that Mr Mumia is innocent.
The Point was that people were arguing that the fact that Van Jones supported a re-trial for Mr Mumia, is a REASON HE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE APPOINTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE.
Trying to discriminate against Mr Jones by disqualifying him for eligibility for a job based on his opinion of Mr Mumia's case IS an attempt at denial of MR JONES' first amendment rights. Especially since that opinion has nothing to do with the job in question.
Oh please!
When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.
He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why did they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.
And stop deluding yourself.
Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.
Last edited: