Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fuck that
wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.
wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.
By extrapolating your statement: You want to encourage the (so far) quiet muslim groups to take a front row seat, and become powerful opinion formers in these countries so that they can guide their countries in an anti-western anti-israeli anti-secular direction?
Do you work for the oil industry or the US military or its industrial complex by any chance?
__________________no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.
Thats not negotiation.
wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.
More like he bowed down to his Zionist masters.
no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.
Thats not negotiation.
Not too long ago the UN passed a resolution stating that Zionism is racism, they later took that back and rescinded it when its obvious what Zionism is.
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaUnited Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on November 10, 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions), "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination". The resolution was revoked by Resolution 46/86 on December 16, 1991. In the history of the UN, this is the only resolution that has ever been revoked.
Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracleFuck that
See what I mean? Just as I expected.
He got a stick up his ass over it, so I kept sayin' it.Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracleSee what I mean? Just as I expected.
JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?
**********************************************************************************wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.
More like he bowed down to his Zionist masters.
no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.
That’s not negotiation.
Appearently back in March 1984, the Reagan Administration "..... just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate" concerning Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq.Document 47: Department of State Cable from George P. Shultz to the Mission to the European Office of the United Nations and Other International Organizations. "U.N. Human Rights Commission: Item 12: Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq," March 14, 1984.
The State Department instructs the U.S. delegate to the United Nations to get the support of other Western missions for a motion of "no decision" regarding Iran's draft resolution condemning Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Failing that, the U.S. is to abstain on the resolution.
The U.S. is to emphasize points made in a recent State Department press conference, including the assertion that "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs."
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act
So I Googled it
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaUnited Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on November 10, 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions), "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination". The resolution was revoked by Resolution 46/86 on December 16, 1991. In the history of the UN, this is the only resolution that has ever been revoked.
He got a stick up his ass over it, so I kept sayin' it.Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle
JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?
Same reason for my posts in Willows '****' thread.
Some people get too worked up over a word
**********************************************************************************More like he bowed down to his Zionist masters.
no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.
Thats not negotiation.
Appearently back in March 1984, the Reagan Administration "..... just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate" concerning Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq.Document 47: Department of State Cable from George P. Shultz to the Mission to the European Office of the United Nations and Other International Organizations. "U.N. Human Rights Commission: Item 12: Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq," March 14, 1984.
The State Department instructs the U.S. delegate to the United Nations to get the support of other Western missions for a motion of "no decision" regarding Iran's draft resolution condemning Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Failing that, the U.S. is to abstain on the resolution.
The U.S. is to emphasize points made in a recent State Department press conference, including the assertion that "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs."
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act
We all know that the US would go on to reverse this position on Iraq's "chemical weapons," and would even appeal for UN intervention, once it became evident that Saddam that might use them on America's friends - instead of her enemies.
Although the official US foreign policy has always been, "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs," there was never any evidence that the Iranians had ever resorted to the use of "chemical weapons!"
- Congratufuckin'lationsHe got a stick up his ass over it, so I kept sayin' it.Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle
JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?
Same reason for my posts in Willows '****' thread.
Some people get too worked up over a word