P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 79,799
- 4,414
- 1,815
RE: US says Israeli courts determine legality of settlements
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
This could apply to some circumstances; or any controversial situations.
(COMMENT)Indeed, but nonaggression and territorial integrity will get you there.
The Charter protections on the matters of aggression and territorial integrity really do not apply to the territories:
◈ Since the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty (26 March 1979).
◈ Since the The Jordan-Israeli Peace Treaty (1994).
As you are so proud to point out to me (often), the Arab Palestinians were not a party to the conflict [either an International Armed Conflict (IAC) or a Non-International Armed Conflict (NAIC)] involved. The Israels assumed control of the West Bank and Jerusalem from the control of Jordan. The Israels assumed control of the Gaza Strip from Egypt. As you can see, Israel has a permanent peace treaty with both Jordan and Egypt.
The Armistice and the demarcations along with them were nullified by the permanent peaceful settlement between the Parties, and the new international boundary between the parties delimited. In NO CASE were the Arab Palestinians a victim of Israeli acts of aggression in which territory under Arab Palestinian sovereign control was overtaken by Israel.
Most Respectfully,
R
What does this have to do with Palestine?The Israels assumed control of the West Bank and Jerusalem from the control of Jordan. The Israels assumed control of the Gaza Strip from Egypt. As you can see, Israel has a permanent peace treaty with both Jordan and Egypt.
I know, I know, the Palestinians don't have any rights.