Fraulein Hilda
Rookie
- May 23, 2009
- 1,068
- 55
- 0
- Banned
- #101
We already have those constraints. Merely because they exist does not mean we can create more and more and more.
Horse shit liberal logic.
Horse shit liberal logic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
typical red dawn strawmenThe government should not mandate vacation time because it gives them too much control over what should be the right of a business owner. Very communistic in its approach.
Agreed.
We should actually get rid of all Statist constraints on the rights of business owners.
We should get rid of child work laws, we should get rid of workplace safety laws, and we should get rid of minimum wage and overtime pay laws. And what liberal PC fuck thought up those workplace ergonomics bullshit! I don't trust liberal scientists. I never heard on anybody needing ergonomic office equipment. What a load of crap.
I'm with you brother. if a business owner want to hire ten year olds, pay them 50 cents an hour, and work them 14 hours a day, the communistic liberal governmnet has no place putting constraints on the rights of business owners.
We should actually get rid of all Statist constraints on the rights of business owners.
We should get rid of child work laws, we should get rid of workplace safety laws, and we should get rid of minimum wage and overtime pay laws. And what liberal PC fuck thought up those workplace ergonomics bullshit! I don't trust liberal scientists. I never heard on anybody needing ergonomic office equipment. What a load of crap.
I'm with you brother. if a business owner want to hire ten year olds, pay them 50 cents an hour, and work them 14 hours a day, the communistic liberal governmnet has no place putting constraints on the rights of business owners.
How long until they tell you where to vacation? I was 35 years old before I had a vacation , I saved for 5 years .Why can't other people take care of themselves?They could take money from the stim package and give each family $5,000/individual $2,000 to go on vacation. That way companies wouldn't be out anything and the families would be able to spend their own money while on vacation, thus giving the economy a boost.
How long until they tell you were to vacation? I was 35 years old before I had a vacation , I saved for 5 years .Why can't other people take care of themselves?They could take money from the stim package and give each family $5,000/individual $2,000 to go on vacation. That way companies wouldn't be out anything and the families would be able to spend their own money while on vacation, thus giving the economy a boost.
um, mraf, if you only have 9 words to add, try putting it all in one post
I do not believe that no other interpretation is possible. If that were true everyone would simply agree with me. It seems odd that I have to continually remind people that my posts are simply my opinion in most cases.
I don't deny that some parts of the Constitution may be confusing, the second amendment is an excellent example. That's why we can look at other sources for what they may have meant. It's clear that it was intended for the American people to be free to own guns and that it is unconstitutional for the government to regulate that right in any way.
"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." - James Madison, "Father of the Constitution"
I think you also have to take into account the current situation of the country at the time it was written.
Madison was against the US having a standing army, thus he felt all citizens should be armed and available to become the army at any time. The fact that we do have a standing army does not make the right to bear arms any less significant now than it was then. A big point for him was that the people needed the means to rise up against an oppressive government if the need arose again.
Great!
So let's get rid of our standing army and just arm citizens.
Yeah, that'll almost work.
Then all we need to is insure that when the enemy comes, we get them to stand up out in the open in red coats while we get to shoot them from behind stone walls.
Hey it worked in the 18th century so we just need to do that again, right?
This is one of the reasons why those of you who imagine you're strict interpretationists of the Constitution are fucking fools, ya know.
The world changed and you guy still imagine that we can have the same government structure we had 230 years ago.
Hey I know...lets have 18th century health care, too.
Then nobody needs HC insurance, either.
While we're at it, let's get rid of our dollars and we can all print up our own, money.
Because isn't that how you guys (who all imainge you're legal scholars) interpret the constitution?
Is there a constitutional authority to force employers to hire American citizens or legal immigrants?No, they have no constitutional authority to do this.
they have the constitutional authority to enforce the laws of this countryIs there a constitutional authority to force employers to hire American citizens or legal immigrants?No, they have no constitutional authority to do this.
I think you also have to take into account the current situation of the country at the time it was written.
Madison was against the US having a standing army, thus he felt all citizens should be armed and available to become the army at any time. The fact that we do have a standing army does not make the right to bear arms any less significant now than it was then. A big point for him was that the people needed the means to rise up against an oppressive government if the need arose again.
Great!
So let's get rid of our standing army and just arm citizens.
Yeah, that'll almost work.
Then all we need to is insure that when the enemy comes, we get them to stand up out in the open in red coats while we get to shoot them from behind stone walls.
Hey it worked in the 18th century so we just need to do that again, right?
This is one of the reasons why those of you who imagine you're strict interpretationists of the Constitution are fucking fools, ya know.
The world changed and you guy still imagine that we can have the same government structure we had 230 years ago.
Hey I know...lets have 18th century health care, too.
Then nobody needs HC insurance, either.
While we're at it, let's get rid of our dollars and we can all print up our own, money.
Because isn't that how you guys (who all imainge you're legal scholars) interpret the constitution?
That's very funny. The Republicans have done so much to dumb down everything about America ... cuts in education, not believing in evolution, the earth is 6,000 years old, etc.Worthless law since it exempts small business, just like FMLA. Sure looks great on paper, but when the vast majority of American workers don't qualify - why bother?!
A more productive bill would be to lower the OT threshold to 35 hours. It'll get more people back to work and that's what the economy needs most.
So you would advocate that everybody that is currently employed full time should take a 12.5% pay cut? How is that going to stimulate the economy?
Liberals believe if you dumb down prosperity far enough, everyone can be prosperous.
you know the strawman topics, for sureThat's very funny. The Republicans have done so much to dumb down everything about America ... cuts in education, not believing in evolution, the earth is 6,000 years old, etc.So you would advocate that everybody that is currently employed full time should take a 12.5% pay cut? How is that going to stimulate the economy?
Liberals believe if you dumb down prosperity far enough, everyone can be prosperous.