US Army Halts training labeling Christians as Extremist

Geaux4it

Intensity Factor 4-Fold
May 31, 2009
22,873
4,295
290
Tennessee
Exclusive: Army halts training program that labeled Christians as extremists

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013...rogram-that-labeled-christians-as-extremists/

The Secretary of the Army has ordered military leaders to halt all briefings on extremist organizations that labeled Evangelical Christian groups as domestic hate groups. The shutdown comes just four days after I reported exclusively about a briefing at Mississippi’s Camp Shelby that labeled the American Family Association as a domestic hate group.

“On several occasions over the past few months, media accounts have highlighted instances of Army instructors supplementing programs of instruction and including information or material that is inaccurate, objectionable and otherwise inconsistent with current Army policy,” Army Sec. John McHugh wrote to military leaders in a memorandum I obtained.

McHugh “directed that Army leaders cease all briefings, command presentations or training on the subject of extremist organizations or activities until that program of instruction and training has been created and disseminated,” Army spokesman Col. David Patterson, Jr., tells me.


http://onenewsnow.com//national-sec...stian-bias-in-military-briefings#.UmoxUXBNJ8E

Reporter: More evidence of anti-Christian bias in military briefings - See more at: http://onenewsnow.com//national-sec...stian-bias-in-military-briefings#.UmoxUXBNJ8E

A Fox News journalist says Americans will be “dumbfounded” as his sources continue to reveal what is being taught to U.S. military personnel about the “inside threat” posed by pro-family and pro-life groups in America.

UPDATE ... The Secretary of the Army has ordered military leaders to halt all briefings on extremist organizations that labeled evangelical Christian groups as "domestic hate groups."

As recently reported on OneNewsNow and Fox News, a briefing at the U.S. Army’s Camp Shelby in Mississippi identified the American Family Association and others as “domestic hate groups.” Fox News columnist Todd Starnes broke that story, citing an unidentified source within the military ranks. Now Starnes tells “Washington Watch” on American Family Radio about a similar event even more recently at Fort Hood, Texas.

"A soldier at Fort Hood – who happens to be an evangelical Christian – was attending that briefing with about 100 other soldiers ... and the focus of this briefing was ‘inside threats,’” explained the reporter. “And in the course of this briefing, the instructor told the men and women that the greatest threats facing the country at this point, at this stage, come from evangelical Christians as well as the tea party."

According to Starnes, pro-life activists were also cited as examples of what happens with people become “radicalized.”

“[The briefing] suggested that people who are pro-life and involved in the pro-life movement would eventually, possibly blow up abortion clinics,” he told Washington Watch host Tony Perkins. “This is what the soldier told us they talked about in that meeting.”
 
Last edited:
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.
 
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.

I just post the links. It's up to the reader to determine how to apply it. I do however believe it's true under this current illegal administration

-Geaux
 
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.

I just post the links. It's up to the reader to determine how to apply it. I do however believe it's true under this current illegal administration

-Geaux

Yep.....................only trouble is, you don't post links from real news sites, you just post the links of the bloggers who believe as you do.

Repeat a lie long enough, and some will believe it as truth, but trouble is, some will recognize the lie the first couple of times and recognize you as a parrot for the lie.

Me? I choose to learn the facts and really don't say the links are true unless I can back them up from at least 3 different sources. Remember....................the most stable point in the Universe is made up from at least 3 other points (in geometry, it's called a plane).

Education is a wonderful thing, isn't it? Especially when it shows you how to separate the lies from the truth.
 
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.

I just post the links. It's up to the reader to determine how to apply it. I do however believe it's true under this current illegal administration

-Geaux

Yep.....................only trouble is, you don't post links from real news sites, you just post the links of the bloggers who believe as you do.

Repeat a lie long enough, and some will believe it as truth, but trouble is, some will recognize the lie the first couple of times and recognize you as a parrot for the lie.

Me? I choose to learn the facts and really don't say the links are true unless I can back them up from at least 3 different sources. Remember....................the most stable point in the Universe is made up from at least 3 other points (in geometry, it's called a plane).

Education is a wonderful thing, isn't it? Especially when it shows you how to separate the lies from the truth.

So because "real" news sites don't cover a story, that must mean it's not true. Nice logic there: it can't be true because MSNBC didn't say so.
 
I just post the links. It's up to the reader to determine how to apply it. I do however believe it's true under this current illegal administration

-Geaux

Yep.....................only trouble is, you don't post links from real news sites, you just post the links of the bloggers who believe as you do.

Repeat a lie long enough, and some will believe it as truth, but trouble is, some will recognize the lie the first couple of times and recognize you as a parrot for the lie.

Me? I choose to learn the facts and really don't say the links are true unless I can back them up from at least 3 different sources. Remember....................the most stable point in the Universe is made up from at least 3 other points (in geometry, it's called a plane).

Education is a wonderful thing, isn't it? Especially when it shows you how to separate the lies from the truth.

So because "real" news sites don't cover a story, that must mean it's not true. Nice logic there: it can't be true because MSNBC didn't say so.

Actually, it's not true because you found some blogger to help you with your cause.

I really don't care what the news source is, I just want it to be true.
 
Yep.....................only trouble is, you don't post links from real news sites, you just post the links of the bloggers who believe as you do.

Repeat a lie long enough, and some will believe it as truth, but trouble is, some will recognize the lie the first couple of times and recognize you as a parrot for the lie.

Me? I choose to learn the facts and really don't say the links are true unless I can back them up from at least 3 different sources. Remember....................the most stable point in the Universe is made up from at least 3 other points (in geometry, it's called a plane).

Education is a wonderful thing, isn't it? Especially when it shows you how to separate the lies from the truth.

So because "real" news sites don't cover a story, that must mean it's not true. Nice logic there: it can't be true because MSNBC didn't say so.

Actually, it's not true because you found some blogger to help you with your cause.

I really don't care what the news source is, I just want it to be true.

So, 3 sources say its so, so it's true.? :cuckoo:

-Geaux
 
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.

And Faux News won their right to lie in a Florida courtroom. A right they use very freely and often.
 
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.

I just post the links. It's up to the reader to determine how to apply it. I do however believe it's true under this current illegal administration

-Geaux

Illegal administration? Are you stating that this administration was not voted in? Perhaps they were put in office by the Supreme Court?

OK, you want a differant administration. You will have your chance in 2016. Run someone you like, like Cruz or Bachmann. All you have to do is get the majority of the American voters to agree with you.
 
Yep.....................only trouble is, you don't post links from real news sites, you just post the links of the bloggers who believe as you do.

Repeat a lie long enough, and some will believe it as truth, but trouble is, some will recognize the lie the first couple of times and recognize you as a parrot for the lie.

Me? I choose to learn the facts and really don't say the links are true unless I can back them up from at least 3 different sources. Remember....................the most stable point in the Universe is made up from at least 3 other points (in geometry, it's called a plane).H

Education is a wonderful thing, isn't it? Especially when it shows you how to separate the lies from the truth.

So because "real" news sites don't cover a story, that must mean it's not true. Nice logic there: it can't be true because MSNBC didn't say so.

Actually, it's not true because you found some blogger to help you with your cause.

I really don't care what the news source is, I just want it to be true.

You lie - you just want the news to be hidden and since it was exposed you immediately jump to defend whatever this admin does, because you are not able to think for yourself, you are there to be a "party soldier"
 
Those who post blogger commentary that is untrue yet dovetails with one's agenda are propagandists who would have been welcome by the Italian and German fascist parties and the communist parties through Europe and Asia in the 1930s.
 
So because "real" news sites don't cover a story, that must mean it's not true. Nice logic there: it can't be true because MSNBC didn't say so.

Actually, it's not true because you found some blogger to help you with your cause.

I really don't care what the news source is, I just want it to be true.

You lie - you just want the news to be hidden and since it was exposed you immediately jump to defend whatever this admin does, because you are not able to think for yourself, you are there to be a "party soldier"

What evidence do you have that ABikerSailor is lying?
 
I just post the links. It's up to the reader to determine how to apply it. I do however believe it's true under this current illegal administration

-Geaux

Yep.....................only trouble is, you don't post links from real news sites, you just post the links of the bloggers who believe as you do.

Repeat a lie long enough, and some will believe it as truth, but trouble is, some will recognize the lie the first couple of times and recognize you as a parrot for the lie.

Me? I choose to learn the facts and really don't say the links are true unless I can back them up from at least 3 different sources. Remember....................the most stable point in the Universe is made up from at least 3 other points (in geometry, it's called a plane).

Education is a wonderful thing, isn't it? Especially when it shows you how to separate the lies from the truth.

So because "real" news sites don't cover a story, that must mean it's not true. Nice logic there: it can't be true because MSNBC didn't say so.

and thus what is wrong with our country today. The media knows they can hand feed the masses and they won't question it.
 
If you are going to accept blogger stories, inspect the sources of said stories.

In this case, the OP is inaccurate.
 
I find it interesting that some people consider blogs as news and think that they're telling the gospel truth.

Got news for you..................if it's a blog or labeled an opinion piece, it's what someone thinks and not really what is true.

I mean...........................FAUX Nooze has done a good job of labeling their opinions as "news" and "truth" because so many of you sheeple agree with, and spout it, as fact.
You think MSNBC is going to report this? :lmao:

What do you think Fox is lying about here? The training that labels Christians as extremists, or that the Army ordered a halt to such training?

http://www.adfmedia.org/files/ExtremismPresentation.pdf

Slide 24.

Per this news outlet:

WORLD | Army Reserve presentation calls Christians ?extremists? | Leigh Jones | April 5, 2013

The Archdiocese for the Military Services, which endorses priests to work in the military and at VA Medical Centers, chastised the Army for the presentation in a statement issued Thursday: “The Archdiocese is astounded that Catholics were listed alongside groups that are, by their very mission and nature, violent and extremist.”

The list of groups used in the presentation appears to have come from the Southern Poverty Law Center, an organization that has applied a “hate group” label to Christian organizations based on their beliefs about homosexuality.

According to the archdiocese, the Army Chief of Chaplains office investigated the training module and found it an isolated incident not condoned by the Department of the Army. It urged the military’s commanders to take steps to prevent similar training sessions in the future.

George Wright, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, confirmed the presentation was produced by an individual without consent from or knowledge of the Army's chain of command. The presentation is more than a year old, Wright said: "After receiving a single complaint following the presentation, this person deleted the slide, and it was never again shown. … This person has apologized for any offense it may have caused, and we consider the matter closed."

In addition to labeling evangelical Protestants and Catholics as extremists, the training module said soldiers were prohibited from supporting “extremist organizations” by attending public rallies and meetings or taking leadership roles in the groups.

Chaplain Ron Crews, a retired colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve and the executive director for the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, also condemned the presentation.

“Men and women of faith who have served the Army faithfully for centuries shouldn’t be likened to those who have regularly threatened the peace and security of the United States,” he said in a statement. “It is dishonorable for any U.S. military entity to allow this type of wrongheaded characterization.”​

Do you think Wright and Crews were tricked by Fox into believing this?
 
You really need to stop immediately and unquestioningly believing everything your fellow reactionaries tell you, daveman.

They're wrong as the liberals. Constantly.

Come back to reality.
 
You really need to stop immediately and unquestioningly believing everything your fellow reactionaries tell you, daveman.

They're wrong as the liberals. Constantly.

Come back to reality.

Again, you prove yourself completely unable to come up with an original idea, so you have to steal from others

Yep, you're a progressive, all right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top