Saving Soviet Communism in WWII was the beginning of what was to become a permanent plank in the Democrat partys platform. Had Hitler not invaded the Soviet Union not one American Communist/Socialist would have fought for this country after Pearl Harbor. Those who went into the military after Pearl Harbor did so to save the Soviet Union.
The president learned his Communism from books, his family, and from mentors. Community organizing was his only experience in the field before he was elected to office in Illinois. John Kerry along with every older top Democrat got their experience in the political trenches fighting to save Communism in Vietnam.
Today, they have the genocidal world they wanted when they handed victory to Communist butchers in SE Asia. Their problem is that Muslims are doing the killing that was supposed to be reserved for Communist freedom fighters. Note that Communist genocide is on its way to Latin America if Democrats have anything to say about it.
Islams genocidal bent does not bother Barack Taqiyya. Unless John Kerry and his kind are complete idiots they have to be wondering if a worldwide caliphate will do to Communists what they plan on doing to everybody else.
Let me point out that there is not much daylight between Taqiyya the Liar and John Kerry on any topic. I suspect that they are in agreement on population controls, too. Whenever Taqiyya or Kerry say anything I always unscramble their doublespeak. (A good rule to apply to every Democrat.) Population control is definitely behind this one:
One indisputable fact: Malaria kills a million or so kids a year because of the unnecessary ENVIRONMENTAL ban on DDT. The question is: How does Taqiyya the Liar feel about black Africans starving to death? Put the question in perspective by connecting environmental crackpots like Nobel Peace Prize recipient (2004) Wangari Maathai to John Kerry. She accused white scientists of creating HIV/AIDS in order to kill off black Africans. Wangari was a black woman who died in 2011; so I cannot ask her how she feels about death by starvation in order to save the planet for white folks like John Kerry. (I cannot find her views on the DDT ban.)
Government-sponsored slow death genocide is one thing. Lenin and Stalin killed millions by starvation, while latter-day Communists like Pol Pot (1925 - 1998) preferred the hands-on version in Cambodia.
American Communists get away with glorifying Stalin, Mao, Castro, et al., while they secretly admired Pol Pot. He was the ultimate Communist they are all proud of but dare not mention.
A lot of public voices and well-known touchy-feely liberals pay a whole lot of lip service to the horrors of genocide. The fact is this: Genocide became a tool of government in the last century thanks to the very people who advocate government control over every aspect of life and the method of death. Ill make my case against those genocide-hypocrites with excerpts from two different articles in an effort to tie Cambodian genocide to Muslim genocide.
NOTE: Muslim Turks in the Ottoman Empire slaughtering 2,000,000 Christian Armenians preceded Communist genocide in the Soviet Union. Communists and Nazis improved on the technology, but Nazi Germany gets the blame more often than the Soviet Union. Lay it on one or the other if you must. As far as I am concerned it is fair to say that genocide is Islams curse on the world.
There is far too much good stuff in Cliff Kincaids piece about Cambodia for me to cover it all. I do want to cite a few items that are important in light of the current Administrations priorities:
Im not certain what A U.N.-sponsored court is. I am sure that the United Nations never tried any top Cambodian Communist in the UNs phoney International Criminal Court although prosecuting individuals for genocide was one of the reasons for the establishing the ICC in 2002. It is safe to say the United Nations did not have Communists in mind for the ICC. The UNs illegitimate judicial system does not want to set a precedent by trying Communists in The Hague. Ill wager that youll never see a Muslim butcher tried in The Hague either.
Defeating a Communist government was the military objective. Even if you give John Kerry the benefit of the doubt and accept that he simply wanted to get America out of a war, it was Kerry and his kind who worked to facilitate the eventual genocide in Cambodia not to mention the genocide the North Vietnamese carried out against the people of South Vietnam. Anybody who expects less than some form of genocide resulting from Secretary of State Kerrys involvement in the Middle East is living in a dream world.
It aint Scrabble but it is a word game
Words have meaning even when they are not spoken. Separating Communisms innate brutality from the Khmer Rouge is the template for separating Muslim brutality from the religion of peace Islam.
Impatience is a virtue to fanatics hellbent on genocide; they move things along wherever possible.
Ill close with Mark Steyn who points out that Muslims are in a hurry. They are presently stymied by Israels s stubbornness. Rather than lose their edge Muslims stay in practice with smaller targets:
The president learned his Communism from books, his family, and from mentors. Community organizing was his only experience in the field before he was elected to office in Illinois. John Kerry along with every older top Democrat got their experience in the political trenches fighting to save Communism in Vietnam.
Today, they have the genocidal world they wanted when they handed victory to Communist butchers in SE Asia. Their problem is that Muslims are doing the killing that was supposed to be reserved for Communist freedom fighters. Note that Communist genocide is on its way to Latin America if Democrats have anything to say about it.
Islams genocidal bent does not bother Barack Taqiyya. Unless John Kerry and his kind are complete idiots they have to be wondering if a worldwide caliphate will do to Communists what they plan on doing to everybody else.
Let me point out that there is not much daylight between Taqiyya the Liar and John Kerry on any topic. I suspect that they are in agreement on population controls, too. Whenever Taqiyya or Kerry say anything I always unscramble their doublespeak. (A good rule to apply to every Democrat.) Population control is definitely behind this one:
Speaking at the U.S.-Africa Summit earlier this week, Secretary of State John Kerry had a bit of astonishing advice for African leaders. While noting that Africa faces a starvation problem, he also admonished its leaders not to create more farms.
The reason? Adding more farms would contribute to global warming. Yeah, he really said that:
XXXXX
Without getting into the whole global warming debate, the fact remains: it is a debate. While some data is inconclusive, other data suggests that the planet hasnt warmed for nearly 18 years or more. What isnt a debate is that without food, people starve to death.
Kerry: Starving Africa Shouldnt Build More Farms Because It Would Contribute to Global Warming
By MIKE MILLER
1 day ago
Kerry: Starving Africa Shouldn?t Build More Farms Because It Would Contribute to Global Warming
One indisputable fact: Malaria kills a million or so kids a year because of the unnecessary ENVIRONMENTAL ban on DDT. The question is: How does Taqiyya the Liar feel about black Africans starving to death? Put the question in perspective by connecting environmental crackpots like Nobel Peace Prize recipient (2004) Wangari Maathai to John Kerry. She accused white scientists of creating HIV/AIDS in order to kill off black Africans. Wangari was a black woman who died in 2011; so I cannot ask her how she feels about death by starvation in order to save the planet for white folks like John Kerry. (I cannot find her views on the DDT ban.)
Government-sponsored slow death genocide is one thing. Lenin and Stalin killed millions by starvation, while latter-day Communists like Pol Pot (1925 - 1998) preferred the hands-on version in Cambodia.
American Communists get away with glorifying Stalin, Mao, Castro, et al., while they secretly admired Pol Pot. He was the ultimate Communist they are all proud of but dare not mention.
A lot of public voices and well-known touchy-feely liberals pay a whole lot of lip service to the horrors of genocide. The fact is this: Genocide became a tool of government in the last century thanks to the very people who advocate government control over every aspect of life and the method of death. Ill make my case against those genocide-hypocrites with excerpts from two different articles in an effort to tie Cambodian genocide to Muslim genocide.
NOTE: Muslim Turks in the Ottoman Empire slaughtering 2,000,000 Christian Armenians preceded Communist genocide in the Soviet Union. Communists and Nazis improved on the technology, but Nazi Germany gets the blame more often than the Soviet Union. Lay it on one or the other if you must. As far as I am concerned it is fair to say that genocide is Islams curse on the world.
There is far too much good stuff in Cliff Kincaids piece about Cambodia for me to cover it all. I do want to cite a few items that are important in light of the current Administrations priorities:
With President Obama reluctantly acting on behalf of Christians in Iraq, in order to avert what he calls a potential genocide, the United Nations is going through the motions of coming to grips with the nearly 40-year-old communist genocide in Cambodia. A U.N.-sponsored court has convicted two Cambodian communist leaders of crimes against humanity.
Im not certain what A U.N.-sponsored court is. I am sure that the United Nations never tried any top Cambodian Communist in the UNs phoney International Criminal Court although prosecuting individuals for genocide was one of the reasons for the establishing the ICC in 2002. It is safe to say the United Nations did not have Communists in mind for the ICC. The UNs illegitimate judicial system does not want to set a precedent by trying Communists in The Hague. Ill wager that youll never see a Muslim butcher tried in The Hague either.
For the record, the U.S. supported Lon Nol, who was defeated by the Khmer Rouge in 1975. The New York Times ran a story headlined, Indochina without Americans: for most a better life. Out of a total population of seven million, some two to three million Cambodians were killed.
Rather than facilitate the genocide, the U.S. tried to prevent it.
Defeating a Communist government was the military objective. Even if you give John Kerry the benefit of the doubt and accept that he simply wanted to get America out of a war, it was Kerry and his kind who worked to facilitate the eventual genocide in Cambodia not to mention the genocide the North Vietnamese carried out against the people of South Vietnam. Anybody who expects less than some form of genocide resulting from Secretary of State Kerrys involvement in the Middle East is living in a dream world.
It aint Scrabble but it is a word game
Words have meaning even when they are not spoken. Separating Communisms innate brutality from the Khmer Rouge is the template for separating Muslim brutality from the religion of peace Islam.
In his statement on Thursday, Obama called them terrorists or militants but did not use the words Islamic or Islamists.
XXXXX
The Khmer Rouge was the communist version of ISIS in Iraq.
XXXXX
There was only one reference in the story by Thomas Fuller and Julia Wallace to the fact that the Khmer Rouge was a communist organization. The story noted that Mr. Nuon Chea, who was the deputy secretary of the Communist Party of Kampuchea under Pol Pot, defended Khmer Rouge policies as necessary to the development of a peoples democratic revolution.
XXXXX
In other words, the genocide was communism in action. Killing people on a mass scale is what Marxists do.
XXXXX
. . . Khmer Rouge were communists. The phrase actually means Red Cambodians.
XXXXX
A 1984 film, The Killing Fields, was supposed to be the story about the genocide. But as Irvine noted, it would have been truer to reality if it had dared to use the word communist in describing those who were doing the killing.
Genocide: the Communist and Islamic Versions
By Cliff Kincaid August 9, 2014
Genocide: the Communist and Islamic Versions
Impatience is a virtue to fanatics hellbent on genocide; they move things along wherever possible.
Ill close with Mark Steyn who points out that Muslims are in a hurry. They are presently stymied by Israels s stubbornness. Rather than lose their edge Muslims stay in practice with smaller targets:
These final excerpts are not true of all Americans. They describe Democrats and the policies of betrayal they set in motion during the Vietnam War:There have been Christians in Mosul for just shy of two millennia, since the first century. There are none today.
The Yazidi are practitioners of Kurdistan's oldest religion, fire-worshippers whose presence in the region predates Islam. They're either being executed or starved to death on a mountain:
We are being slaughtered. Our entire religion is being wiped off the face of the earth.
ISIS are fast-track Nazis. No messing about with a few property restrictions and intermarriage laws as a little light warm-up: They're only in the business of "final solutions", and they start on Day One and don't quit until the last Christian and Yazidi is dead or fled.
An engineer and a father of three young children, Karim spent years working for the U.S. Army in his area, then for an American medical charity. He's been waiting for months to find out whether the U.S. government will grant him a Special Immigrant Visa because of his service, and because of the danger he currently faces.
Good luck with that. America's depraved immigration bureaucracy is too busy organizing teddy bears for gangbangers at the southern border and terrorizing bagpipers at the northern borders. So how did helping out the Americans work out for Karim?
XXXXX
Perhaps it's just as well we're so bad at "winning hearts and minds". We won Karim's heart and mind - and then ran over it in the stampede for the exits. A few weeks ago I quoted Prince Sirik Matak, the former Cambodian Prime Minister, shortly before his murder by the Khmer Rouge:
Mark it well that, if I shall die here on the spot and in my country that I love, it is too bad because we are all born and must die one day. I have only committed the mistake of believing in you, the Americans.
On the lam, trying to keep one step ahead of ISIS, Karim can be forgiven for coming to the same bleak conclusion.