HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Yeah....but do they have infrastructure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not hard at all. You are assuming that life is the result of evolution. There is plenty of real science that shows a naturalistic origin is probably impossible. Even the simplest life has thousands of components that must be in place at the same time for life to exist. There is no way that this could happen by chance. In other words, life had a Creator. No other explanation makes sense.Universe has 2 trillion galaxies, astronomers say
Hubble telescope images from deep space were collected over 20 years to solve the puzzle of how many galaxies the cosmos harbors
There are a dizzying 2 trillion galaxies in the universe, up to 20 times more than previously thought, astronomers reported on Thursday. The surprising finding, based on 3D modeling of images collected over 20 years by the Hubble Space Telescope, was published in the Astronomical Journal.
Scientists have puzzled over how many galaxies the cosmos harbors at least since US astronomer Edwin Hubble showed in 1924 that Andromeda, a neighboring galaxy, was not part of our own Milky Way. But even in the era of modern astronomy, getting an accurate tally has proven difficult.
To begin with, there is only part of the cosmos where light given off by distant objects has had time to reach Earth. The rest is effectively beyond our reach. And even within this “observable universe”, current technology only allows us to glimpse 10% of what is out there, according to the new findings.
Imagine how many planets?? Hard to believe there' aint life on none of them.
There was a thread here a while ago, which argued a bio centric universe, after a theory of prof. Lanza and co. I think it is possible that life comes from where everything was before the Big Bang.
Life is a construction of particular atoms, many of which can only be created inside stars and some of which can only be created when a star explodes. Life is a result of the creation and death of stars and the elements they produce. It all happened in this universe.
Agreed. Of course we still have Fermi's Paradox.Universe has 2 trillion galaxies, astronomers say
Hubble telescope images from deep space were collected over 20 years to solve the puzzle of how many galaxies the cosmos harbors
There are a dizzying 2 trillion galaxies in the universe, up to 20 times more than previously thought, astronomers reported on Thursday. The surprising finding, based on 3D modeling of images collected over 20 years by the Hubble Space Telescope, was published in the Astronomical Journal.
Scientists have puzzled over how many galaxies the cosmos harbors at least since US astronomer Edwin Hubble showed in 1924 that Andromeda, a neighboring galaxy, was not part of our own Milky Way. But even in the era of modern astronomy, getting an accurate tally has proven difficult.
To begin with, there is only part of the cosmos where light given off by distant objects has had time to reach Earth. The rest is effectively beyond our reach. And even within this “observable universe”, current technology only allows us to glimpse 10% of what is out there, according to the new findings.
Imagine how many planets?? Hard to believe there' aint life on none of them.
OK. Answer me this. What experimental evidence exists that supports a naturalistic origin of life? Give me just one example. And speaking of doctors, they kill more people than guns do. Know why? Because the pharmaceutical companies are corrupt, money grubbing bastards. Doctors prescribe this poison, because there is no alternative. Then there is endemic malpractice involved too. Anyway, none of this is relevant to the discussion we are having. We were discussing the origin of life.Not doctors.Odd yes, science is too be revered if your doctor prescribes something or tells you you have liver disease and need surgery, or cancer, but anything that doesn't benefit these people is just 'scientific speculation'.
I find it so childishly lame and laughable.
OK. Answer me this. What experimental evidence exists that supports a naturalistic origin of life? Give me just one example. And speaking of doctors, they kill more people than guns do. Know why? Because the pharmaceutical companies are corrupt, money grubbing bastards. Doctors prescribe this poison, because there is no alternative. Then there is endemic malpractice involved too. Anyway, none of this is relevant to the discussion we are having. We were discussing the origin of life.Not doctors.Odd yes, science is too be revered if your doctor prescribes something or tells you you have liver disease and need surgery, or cancer, but anything that doesn't benefit these people is just 'scientific speculation'.
I find it so childishly lame and laughable.
Then why are you discussing the Origin of life? Granted, I brought up the topic of Creation, but you ran with it. Me thinks, thou doth protest too much.OK. Answer me this. What experimental evidence exists that supports a naturalistic origin of life? Give me just one example. And speaking of doctors, they kill more people than guns do. Know why? Because the pharmaceutical companies are corrupt, money grubbing bastards. Doctors prescribe this poison, because there is no alternative. Then there is endemic malpractice involved too. Anyway, none of this is relevant to the discussion we are having. We were discussing the origin of life.Not doctors.Odd yes, science is too be revered if your doctor prescribes something or tells you you have liver disease and need surgery, or cancer, but anything that doesn't benefit these people is just 'scientific speculation'.
I find it so childishly lame and laughable.
Nah, the thread is about galaxies.
Then why are you discussing the Origin of life? Granted, I brought up the topic of Creation, but you ran with it. Me thinks, thou doth protest too much.OK. Answer me this. What experimental evidence exists that supports a naturalistic origin of life? Give me just one example. And speaking of doctors, they kill more people than guns do. Know why? Because the pharmaceutical companies are corrupt, money grubbing bastards. Doctors prescribe this poison, because there is no alternative. Then there is endemic malpractice involved too. Anyway, none of this is relevant to the discussion we are having. We were discussing the origin of life.Not doctors.Odd yes, science is too be revered if your doctor prescribes something or tells you you have liver disease and need surgery, or cancer, but anything that doesn't benefit these people is just 'scientific speculation'.
I find it so childishly lame and laughable.
Nah, the thread is about galaxies.
Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. We didn't know what atoms looked like until the last century, but the idea dates back to the Greeks. Just because we don't know how life started doesn't mean it can't happen. As posted above, I think it's extremely rare.OK. Answer me this. What experimental evidence exists that supports a naturalistic origin of life? Give me just one example. And speaking of doctors, they kill more people than guns do. Know why? Because the pharmaceutical companies are corrupt, money grubbing bastards. Doctors prescribe this poison, because there is no alternative. Then there is endemic malpractice involved too. Anyway, none of this is relevant to the discussion we are having. We were discussing the origin of life.Not doctors.
There's a shitload of them. Why don't you think we've had first contact yet? Do you think there is evidence on Earth of previous extraterrestrial contact?Nah, the thread is about galaxies.
How do they know that?
I mean if Universe is endless how could they be so accurate?
The universe isn't endless. It's estimated to be about 150 billion light years across. It started expanding at the point of the Big Bang and space itself is not bound by the speed of light so it has been expanding faster than the speed of light. Apparently.
Unknown, but there is no reason to think it is.But are we the only Universe?
The universe is not endless.How do they know that?
I mean if Universe is endless how could they be so accurate?
No, we are not the only universe.But are we the only Universe?
That is one theory. A materialistic perspective on the question.Life is a construction of particular atoms, many of which can only be created inside stars and some of which can only be created when a star explodes. Life is a result of the creation and death of stars and the elements they produce. It all happened in this universe.
Or the Law Maker upon which the very notion of the Laws of Science are based.I can't believe that in this day, and age; the very people who's lives as they know them, the decisions that they will make, and the first to run to science for tangible, real results... Try to deny the very science that makes their lives possible.
There's a shitload of them. Why don't you think we've had first contact yet? Do you think there is evidence on Earth of previous extraterrestrial contact?Nah, the thread is about galaxies.
There's a shitload of them. Why don't you think we've had first contact yet? Do you think there is evidence on Earth of previous extraterrestrial contact?Nah, the thread is about galaxies.
The distances are too great and we've only been transmitting signal for at maximum 100 years. And according to the link a general radio wave or tv wave degrades as it heads out into space. Only a focused signal would travel any meaningful distance and be picked up. I didn't know this until reading the article. It appears most of what has been transmitted from Earth is only viable for a few lights years away, after that it becomes very difficult to pick out patterns against background noise. The same would be the case of signals reaching us from elsewhere. It appears to be a huge hurdle for coherent contact between intelligences across the vastness of space. But, it isn't impossible.
How Far Have Our Radio Signals Traveled From Earth?
There isn't any evidence I've seen that extraterrestrials have visited Earth before or currently. We'd have something concrete.
As far as other universes this is only speculation at the moment. Mathematically possible and I think probable according to some physicists, but certainly no evidence. If they were to spring up I would guess they would be related to super-massive black holes. Somehow a new 'bubble' erupts out of a smbh into another dimension because of the gravity and energies involved. But no evidence of this. We also see streams of particles emitted from huge black holes. This seems counter-intuitive to me. If a black hole is so dense and has such immense gravity that even light can't escape then how does anything escape. I've also read that super-massive black holes are what produce dark matter as the center of smph operate outside normal space.
Incredible and infinitely interesting to say the least.
Are you saying God couldn't make it happen?The universe is not endless.How do they know that?
I mean if Universe is endless how could they be so accurate?
That would require an infinite amount of energy to have been released in the Big Bang.