Charles_Main
AR15 Owner
Tomorrow's number is the one that matters, job adds. If he doesn't start getting 150,000 to 200,000 a month by mid next year he's a one termer for sure.
If we can't get it to there by then. We all fucked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tomorrow's number is the one that matters, job adds. If he doesn't start getting 150,000 to 200,000 a month by mid next year he's a one termer for sure.
Tomorrow's number is the one that matters, job adds. If he doesn't start getting 150,000 to 200,000 a month by mid next year he's a one termer for sure.
Tomorrow's number is the one that matters, job adds. If he doesn't start getting 150,000 to 200,000 a month by mid next year he's a one termer for sure.
I understand perfectly. The actual numbers for August 2010 are:You are not getting the point, again tens of thousands of folks, that have always worked, now are working part-time.
Total Part time (<35hrs/week) = 27,418
Part time for non-economic reasons (choice, child-care/family/transportation/medical issues) = 18,558,000
Part time due to slack business = 6,380,000
Part time due to inability to find full time work = 2,347,000
total part time for economic reasons = 8,860,000
Compare this to pre-recession (Aug 2007 as a random date):
Total Part time (<35hrs/week) = 24,266,000
Part time for non-economic reasons (choice, child-care/family/transportation/medical issues) = 19,665,000
Part time due to slack business = 2,991,000
Part time due to inability to find full time work = 1,186,000
total part time for economic reasons = 4,601,000
So clearly things have gotten worse, and it is being tracked. So I'm not sure what your complaint is. No they're not included as "unemployed" because they're not unemployed. But they are being tracked and the problem is known.
Calling them "unemployed" as part of the official numbers would only make it unclear how difficult it is or is not to find a job at all.
Source: Historical Data Table A-8 of the Employment Situation Report (seasonally adjusted all industries)
Go back and look at the original post and the one following. These numbers are not good for Obama and Co., to pretend they are is foolish. Reminds me of a thread started this morning I believe by Maggie Mae on why working class people would favor the GOP by 58% currently.