Ron Paul has stated that he is willing to sell out the freedom of people being discriminated against so that he can protect the freedom of racists
That is his tradeoff
What freedom are they losing exactly? Do you believe only certain groups shoudl be allowed the freedom to tell others what they must do with their property?
Freedom is a tradeoff between the freedom to restrict freedom of association and the freedom of association itself
Ron Paul sides with the racists
That is simply not true. He sides with personal property rights. The right to do what you want with your own property is not limited only to what 'rightwing' finds acceptable. And as has been pointed out several times, you have a double standard on your hands. You insist that property owners must be made by law to treat everyone the same. Yet you don't demand the same laws apply to consumers.
Last edited: