Star
Gold Member
- Apr 5, 2009
- 2,532
- 614
- 190
I'm saying it's not worth the risk for sending (nasty sludge) foreign oil down to the Gulf, to be sold on the Global Market. It's not worth the temporary jobs, and it's certainly not worth 35 permanent ones.
I'm saying it's not worth the risk for sending (nasty sludge) foreign oil down to the Gulf,
You mean the stuff that liberal billionaire, Warren Buffett, is currently shipping on his riskier train cars?
Some of his trains pass a few miles from my house.
Why do you allow him to commit this travesty?
So this issue for you hangs on whether the transporting entity is "liberal" or not?
Thanks for coming out.
So this issue for you hangs on whether the transporting entity is "liberal" or not?
No, the issue is that liberal idiots ignore that this oil is moving through the US, now, shipped in train cars by Warren Buffett.
Building the pipeline moves it more safely.
If "safe" is your criterion --- why bring up Warren Buffett's politics?
Having it both ways: Priceless.
Liberal whiners, whining about safety.
Too stupid to understand rail cars are more dangerous than pipelines?
Don't know Buffett owns the rail cars?
Don't know Buffett is liberal?
Liberal ignorance, wide and deep.
Pointing it out: Hilarious.
Are you saying you think a liberal bankrolled the Burger King inversion?
.