- Dec 29, 2008
- 19,697
- 4,740
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
Clearly you are not thinking at all. "Go nuclear" is a meaningless phrase.So he doesn't think Russia would go nuclear in defense of its only warm-water naval base?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Clearly you are not thinking at all. "Go nuclear" is a meaningless phrase.So he doesn't think Russia would go nuclear in defense of its only warm-water naval base?
So you think a Russian tactical nuke in Crimea would/should result in a nuclear Armageddon?Russia doesn't want to die or be annihilated anymore than anyone else does....
And any nuclear exchange has them on the losing end every time.
YepSo you think a Russian tactical nuke in Crimea would/should result in a nuclear Armageddon?
Who would launch the ICBMs? President Biden? Do you think his handlers would let him do that?
Why would the russians use atomic weapons on their territory?So you think a Russian tactical nuke in Crimea would/should result in a nuclear Armageddon?
So you think a Russian tactical nuke in Crimea would/should result in a nuclear Armageddon?
Poland, UK, Japan, Saudis, France and many more. US would be the last one to the party...maybeWho would launch the ICBMs? President Biden? Do you think his handlers would let him do that?
So why would "Poland, UK, Japan, Saudis, France and many more" start throwing around nukes?Poland, UK, Japan, Saudis, France and many more. US would be the last one to the party...maybe
And it wouldn't be ICBMs...
Some of those stealth cruise missiles would do the trick nicely until there aren't any air defenses left.
They are already upset over many other things Russia has done to them.So why would "Poland, UK, Japan, Saudis, France and many more" start throwing around nukes?
What? Tell us, moron, what did Russia do to them?They are already upset over many other things Russia has done to them.