Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1) Abstaining is the most the U.S. could do, in standing up to Israel. The U.S. isn't that courageous.
The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
No other group on earth were taken out of Europe and plunked themselves down in their own proclaimed "homeland", and proceeded to throw out the current owners.
For years, the Israelis have know that they would have to give back the West Bank lands to the Palestians, but regardless, they chose to build settlements there anyway. Now they complain that others don't see this as a good idea.
The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
No other group on earth were taken out of Europe and plunked themselves down in their own proclaimed "homeland", and proceeded to throw out the current owners.
For years, the Israelis have know that they would have to give back the West Bank lands to the Palestians, but regardless, they chose to build settlements there anyway. Now they complain that others don't see this as a good idea.
The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
No other group on earth were taken out of Europe and plunked themselves down in their own proclaimed "homeland", and proceeded to throw out the current owners.
For years, the Israelis have know that they would have to give back the West Bank lands to the Palestians, but regardless, they chose to build settlements there anyway. Now they complain that others don't see this as a good idea.
The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
No other group on earth were taken out of Europe and plunked themselves down in their own proclaimed "homeland", and proceeded to throw out the current owners.
For years, the Israelis have know that they would have to give back the West Bank lands to the Palestians, but regardless, they chose to build settlements there anyway. Now they complain that others don't see this as a good idea.
And the Israelis would have already given back almost all of the land if the Palestian would stop blowing up Israelis.The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
No other group on earth were taken out of Europe and plunked themselves down in their own proclaimed "homeland", and proceeded to throw out the current owners.
For years, the Israelis have know that they would have to give back the West Bank lands to the Palestians, but regardless, they chose to build settlements there anyway. Now they complain that others don't see this as a good idea.
The U.N. is one of the chief instruments responsible for the resurgence of antisemitism in the post WW2 world.
In deciding that it is the building of a house that is the most egregious obstacle to peace and unfettered terrorism isn't, they are merely fostering an agenda that singles out Jews for that which they single out no other group on Earth.
No other group on earth were taken out of Europe and plunked themselves down in their own proclaimed "homeland", and proceeded to throw out the current owners.
For years, the Israelis have know that they would have to give back the West Bank lands to the Palestians, but regardless, they chose to build settlements there anyway. Now they complain that others don't see this as a good idea.
John Kerry has just been on TV defending this resolution.
1. If it is such a good idea, why didn't the U.S. vote FOR it instead of ABSTAINING?
2. Why do WE have the right to tell the Israelis what THEY should do?
Thoughts/comments?