Twitter Bans Alt-Right

[OldLady]

As Twitter Cracks Down on Alt-Right, Aggrieved Members Flee to 'Gab' - American Renaissance

You can't ban ideas.

And you can't really ban white people.

Damn Internets.

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

Wonder when they will ban the leftists calling for assassinations and physical abuse? Seems a bit worse than ******.. But im sure leftists LOVE the inequality

Those on the right did it also, as the stats will tell you, Oblama has had more death threats against him than any other president ever elected....
Here's a Trump move to ban journalist based on nationality and political discourse..

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has dismissed two of the most well-respected Hispanic journalists in the United States at two separate press conferences. He most recently kicked out Jorge Ramos from an Iowa press conference, an event the Univision anchor was later allowed to reenter.

Jorge Ramos, Univision and Fusion news host, was ejected from a Dubuque, Iowa press conference being held by presidential candidate Donald Trump on August 25, after Ramos attempted to ask questions about the candidate's controversial stances on undocumented immigrants and immigration reform. Trump told Ramos, "Go back to Univision!" before Ramos was escorted out by Trump's security team. Eventually, he was invited back in and allowed to question the candidate.
Trump Has Now Shut Down Two Of The Most Well-Respected Hispanic Journalists At His Press Conferences

Yet I know that Oblama called for Fox news to be shut down also..it is not a special phenomenon of just the left..

Obama was real thin skinned, especially at the beginning. Ramos went on a real RANT and wouldn't shut up (I saw the clip). He was allowed back when he could ask questions without disrupting the whole press conference. What concerned me more was banning WaPo and some others that just printed unflattering articles. Hopefully none of those bans are still in effect.

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

I agree they took that woman's statements out of context and cherry picked what words of hers they used; they got caught and that is enough. Doesn't earn a ban at all, imo. What's wrong with wariness, like everyone seems to be arguing in defense of fake news? I notice nothing was ever said about the other people quoted in the article. Perhaps it wasn't so inaccurate after all? The reporter writing it should have just left that woman out if she didn't fit their argument.

 

[OldLady]

Wonder when they will ban the leftists calling for assassinations and physical abuse? Seems a bit worse than ******.. But im sure leftists LOVE the inequality

Those on the right did it also, as the stats will tell you, Oblama has had more death threats against him than any other president ever elected....
Here's a Trump move to ban journalist based on nationality and political discourse..

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has dismissed two of the most well-respected Hispanic journalists in the United States at two separate press conferences. He most recently kicked out Jorge Ramos from an Iowa press conference, an event the Univision anchor was later allowed to reenter.

Jorge Ramos, Univision and Fusion news host, was ejected from a Dubuque, Iowa press conference being held by presidential candidate Donald Trump on August 25, after Ramos attempted to ask questions about the candidate's controversial stances on undocumented immigrants and immigration reform. Trump told Ramos, "Go back to Univision!" before Ramos was escorted out by Trump's security team. Eventually, he was invited back in and allowed to question the candidate.
Trump Has Now Shut Down Two Of The Most Well-Respected Hispanic Journalists At His Press Conferences

Yet I know that Oblama called for Fox news to be shut down also..it is not a special phenomenon of just the left..

Obama was real thin skinned, especially at the beginning. Ramos went on a real RANT and wouldn't shut up (I saw the clip). He was allowed back when he could ask questions without disrupting the whole press conference. What concerned me more was banning WaPo and some others that just printed unflattering articles. Hopefully none of those bans are still in effect.

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

Freedom of the press, whether wrong or right is a right in the USA, and it will involve press positions whether you agree or not...

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

 

[mudwhistle]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

Wonder when they will ban the leftists calling for assassinations and physical abuse? Seems a bit worse than ******.. But im sure leftists LOVE the inequality

Those on the right did it also, as the stats will tell you, Oblama has had more death threats against him than any other president ever elected....
Here's a Trump move to ban journalist based on nationality and political discourse..

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has dismissed two of the most well-respected Hispanic journalists in the United States at two separate press conferences. He most recently kicked out Jorge Ramos from an Iowa press conference, an event the Univision anchor was later allowed to reenter.

Jorge Ramos, Univision and Fusion news host, was ejected from a Dubuque, Iowa press conference being held by presidential candidate Donald Trump on August 25, after Ramos attempted to ask questions about the candidate's controversial stances on undocumented immigrants and immigration reform. Trump told Ramos, "Go back to Univision!" before Ramos was escorted out by Trump's security team. Eventually, he was invited back in and allowed to question the candidate.
Trump Has Now Shut Down Two Of The Most Well-Respected Hispanic Journalists At His Press Conferences

Yet I know that Oblama called for Fox news to be shut down also..it is not a special phenomenon of just the left..

Obama was real thin skinned, especially at the beginning. Ramos went on a real RANT and wouldn't shut up (I saw the clip). He was allowed back when he could ask questions without disrupting the whole press conference. What concerned me more was banning WaPo and some others that just printed unflattering articles. Hopefully none of those bans are still in effect.

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

I agree they took that woman's statements out of context and cherry picked what words of hers they used; they got caught and that is enough. Doesn't earn a ban at all, imo. What's wrong with wariness, like everyone seems to be arguing in defense of fake news? I notice nothing was ever said about the other people quoted in the article. Perhaps it wasn't so inaccurate after all? The reporter writing it should have just left that woman out if she didn't fit their argument.

Look, accusing Trump of this ignores what Obama has been doing and what Hillary did when she started her campaign.

 

[mudwhistle]

Those on the right did it also, as the stats will tell you, Oblama has had more death threats against him than any other president ever elected....
Here's a Trump move to ban journalist based on nationality and political discourse..
Yet I know that Oblama called for Fox news to be shut down also..it is not a special phenomenon of just the left..

Obama was real thin skinned, especially at the beginning. Ramos went on a real RANT and wouldn't shut up (I saw the clip). He was allowed back when he could ask questions without disrupting the whole press conference. What concerned me more was banning WaPo and some others that just printed unflattering articles. Hopefully none of those bans are still in effect.

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

Freedom of the press, whether wrong or right is a right in the USA, and it will involve press positions whether you agree or not...

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

So you think that misquoting someone in a malicious attempt to ruin their reputation isn't slander?

 

[Moonglow]

Obama was real thin skinned, especially at the beginning. Ramos went on a real RANT and wouldn't shut up (I saw the clip). He was allowed back when he could ask questions without disrupting the whole press conference. What concerned me more was banning WaPo and some others that just printed unflattering articles. Hopefully none of those bans are still in effect.

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

Freedom of the press, whether wrong or right is a right in the USA, and it will involve press positions whether you agree or not...

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

So you think that misquoting someone in a malicious attempt to ruin their reputation isn't slander?

Sure it is, yet that is up to the courts to decide if the actions were libelous....It doesn't mean that it will not occur, it just means there is an outlet for such actions to be adjudicated..

 

[OldLady]

Obama was real thin skinned, especially at the beginning. Ramos went on a real RANT and wouldn't shut up (I saw the clip). He was allowed back when he could ask questions without disrupting the whole press conference. What concerned me more was banning WaPo and some others that just printed unflattering articles. Hopefully none of those bans are still in effect.

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

Freedom of the press, whether wrong or right is a right in the USA, and it will involve press positions whether you agree or not...

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

So you think that misquoting someone in a malicious attempt to ruin their reputation isn't slander?

I'm not sure they can prove "misquoting." She admitted that she said what they quoted. That's what I'm not sure of. It was sleazy journalism, but it is done everyday by Breitbart and other sites, so let's forego all the moral outrage, please.

 

[mudwhistle]

Washington Post should be permanently banned or at least until they learn again what objective reporting is. Slander is against the law.

Freedom of the press, whether wrong or right is a right in the USA, and it will involve press positions whether you agree or not...

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

So you think that misquoting someone in a malicious attempt to ruin their reputation isn't slander?

I'm not sure they can prove "misquoting." She admitted that she said what they quoted. That's what I'm not sure of. It was sleazy journalism, but it is done everyday by Breitbart and other sites, so let's forego all the moral outrage, please.

Yup....two wrongs make a right.

But to libs, correctly quoting someone is wrong because we are always told, "I know he said if you like your doctor you can keep him......WHAT HE REALLY MEANT WAS THIS....!!!"

 

[OldLady]

Freedom of the press, whether wrong or right is a right in the USA, and it will involve press positions whether you agree or not...

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

So you think that misquoting someone in a malicious attempt to ruin their reputation isn't slander?

I'm not sure they can prove "misquoting." She admitted that she said what they quoted. That's what I'm not sure of. It was sleazy journalism, but it is done everyday by Breitbart and other sites, so let's forego all the moral outrage, please.

Yup....two wrongs make a right.

But to libs, correctly quoting someone is wrong because we are always told, "I know he said if you like your doctor you can keep him......WHAT HE REALLY MEANT WAS THIS....!!!"

No. I'm not defending WaPo for their handling of that article, but imo it doesn't warrant banning them from the Presidential Press Corps. It's too common a practice and done on MANY sites, not just the liberal MSM, which you can't deny. I just wonder if the Trumps will prevail on that suit since WaPo didn't actually, technically, lie. I think the President thought he was telling the truth when he said that. But no one can prove that, so you'll believe what you want.

 

[mudwhistle]

Again, slander is against the law. It is actionable in a court of law. Spreading false and malicious rumors can get you sued. Used to be the press was concerned about vetting yheir sources, but that has become passe' these days.

They didn't slander him. They did not technically misquote her. They just cherry picked the words she used. He'll never win, if his lawyers can't persuade him not to bring suit.

So you think that misquoting someone in a malicious attempt to ruin their reputation isn't slander?

I'm not sure they can prove "misquoting." She admitted that she said what they quoted. That's what I'm not sure of. It was sleazy journalism, but it is done everyday by Breitbart and other sites, so let's forego all the moral outrage, please.

Yup....two wrongs make a right.

But to libs, correctly quoting someone is wrong because we are always told, "I know he said if you like your doctor you can keep him......WHAT HE REALLY MEANT WAS THIS....!!!"

No. I'm not defending WaPo for their handling of that article, but imo it doesn't warrant banning them from the Presidential Press Corps. It's too common a practice and done on MANY sites, not just the liberal MSM, which you can't deny. I just wonder if the Trumps will prevail on that suit since WaPo didn't actually, technically, lie. I think the President thought he was telling the truth when he said that. But no one can prove that, so you'll believe what you want.

Well, I can prove he knew it was a lie, but you aren't interested in listening.

The point is this; If the WaPo has shown to be dirty, low-down, lying backstabbing shills for Hillary, why give them the same access as everyone else? Besides, they can just make up a bunch of shit like they always do. I say make em work for their stories.

 

[Divine Wind]

Twitter is clearly determined to follow the path of failure that Friendster and Myspace paved.

Social networks live and die by the user base. Driving users away is a rather poor strategy.

Twitter is a lot bigger than both of those two put together, so it can weather a storm. They are certainly tracking reactions and user input so they will respond accordingly.

 

[Divine Wind]

As Twitter Cracks Down on Alt-Right, Aggrieved Members Flee to 'Gab' - American Renaissance

You can't ban ideas.

And you can't really ban white people.

Damn Internets.

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

Wonder when they will ban the leftists calling for assassinations and physical abuse? Seems a bit worse than ******.. But im sure leftists LOVE the inequality

Those on the right did it also, as the stats will tell you, Oblama has had more death threats against him than any other president ever elected....
Here's a Trump move to ban journalist based on nationality and political discourse..

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has dismissed two of the most well-respected Hispanic journalists in the United States at two separate press conferences. He most recently kicked out Jorge Ramos from an Iowa press conference, an event the Univision anchor was later allowed to reenter.

Jorge Ramos, Univision and Fusion news host, was ejected from a Dubuque, Iowa press conference being held by presidential candidate Donald Trump on August 25, after Ramos attempted to ask questions about the candidate's controversial stances on undocumented immigrants and immigration reform. Trump told Ramos, "Go back to Univision!" before Ramos was escorted out by Trump's security team. Eventually, he was invited back in and allowed to question the candidate.
Trump Has Now Shut Down Two Of The Most Well-Respected Hispanic Journalists At His Press Conferences

Yet I know that Oblama called for Fox news to be shut down also..it is not a special phenomenon of just the left..

Candidate Trump is a lot different than President Trump. We're seeing that happen now. It's called a "reality check".

Trump's flip-flops: Our view

 

[Preacher]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

So true. And where would you ever be without the media and govt and academia and entertainment media all in your camp? And now you have "censorship" as your latest ally.

Jews control the media and politics and education not WHITES.

 

[007]

As Twitter Cracks Down on Alt-Right, Aggrieved Members Flee to 'Gab' - American Renaissance

You can't ban ideas.

And you can't really ban white people.

Damn Internets.

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

Cross burners?

 

[turzovka]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

So true. And where would you ever be without the media and govt and academia and entertainment media all in your camp? And now you have "censorship" as your latest ally.

Jews control the media and politics and education not WHITES.

Do you envy the Jews?... or just despise them?

I doubt Mark Twain shared your views.

 

[Preacher]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

So true. And where would you ever be without the media and govt and academia and entertainment media all in your camp? And now you have "censorship" as your latest ally.

Jews control the media and politics and education not WHITES.

Do you envy the Jews?... or just despise them?

I doubt Mark Twain shared your views.

I will complete Hitler's work. That answer your question? Why don't you use google and do some research how about googling 96% of media is owned by 6 companies and then go look at what EVERY one of the owners has in common....ALL JEWS.

 

[Preacher]

Six Jewish Companies Control 96% of the World’s Media |

Not like anything will change your mind. 99% of the population of the US is brainwashed....in most cases its Stockholm Syndrome.

 

[turzovka]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

So true. And where would you ever be without the media and govt and academia and entertainment media all in your camp? And now you have "censorship" as your latest ally.

Jews control the media and politics and education not WHITES.

Do you envy the Jews?... or just despise them?

I doubt Mark Twain shared your views.

I will complete Hitler's work. That answer your question? Why don't you use google and do some research how about googling 96% of media is owned by 6 companies and then go look at what EVERY one of the owners has in common....ALL JEWS.

Do as you please, to each his own.

Are you suggesting G-d favors your mission?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

So true. And where would you ever be without the media and govt and academia and entertainment media all in your camp? And now you have "censorship" as your latest ally.

If you think a bunch of conspiracy theory nuts with access to a keyboard, a vivid imagination, and no moral, ethical, or even common decency limits is better than the established media, you have a problem. Breitbart, twitter, Alex Jones, and fox are not credible news, and they shouldn't considered as such.

What problem would that be.

That the left values free speech until it no longer benefits them.

That's not a problem...it's common knowledge.

 

[Preacher]

Great idea all the nut bags and cross burners can have their own little site where they can call people nigg## and plot their little revolutions under the watchful eye of the FBI. and the rest of the country can go on with their business without all that crazy crap to deal with. Only someone who wants to find the crazy will go to their site,

So true. And where would you ever be without the media and govt and academia and entertainment media all in your camp? And now you have "censorship" as your latest ally.

Jews control the media and politics and education not WHITES.

Do you envy the Jews?... or just despise them?

I doubt Mark Twain shared your views.

I will complete Hitler's work. That answer your question? Why don't you use google and do some research how about googling 96% of media is owned by 6 companies and then go look at what EVERY one of the owners has in common....ALL JEWS.

Do as you please, to each his own.

Are you suggesting G-d favors your mission?

god doesn't exist. I don't need some invisible sky being to lean on as a crutch....

 

[007]