Tulsi Gabbard at 0% in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada (latest Yougov poll)

[pyetro]

The favorite Democrat in conservative message boards such as USMB isn't doing so well.
Latest Polls

 

[satrebil]

She should run 3rd party. The Democrat/Republican paradigm needs to be broken.

 

[TNHarley]

Democrats don't like her because she is anti war.

 

[Lesh]

She should run 3rd party. The Democrat/Republican paradigm needs to be broken.

There ya go.

THAT is what the Trumpers want.

Someone like Jill Stein to siphon off Dem votes and allow Trump a chance to win re-election

 

[pyetro]

Democrats don't like her because she is anti war.

Most Republicans voted for the Iraq war.
And you lied about Democrats being pro war.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The favorite Democrat in conservative message boards such as USMB isn't doing so well.
Latest Polls

Democrats lack the sense to support the most rational candidate. Should we be surprised?

 

[TNHarley]

Democrats don't like her because she is anti war.

Most Republicans voted for the Iraq war.
And you lied about Democrats being pro war.

I know.
No I didnt.
Strawmen and false accusations. Quite a monday for you, dumbfuck.

 

[gipper]

Tulsi at zero, but Lil’ Pete is leading in Iowa. WTF!

He is owned by billionaires and is a fake progressive plus a warmonger. Yet, he out polls Tulsi. Something stinks here.

 

[petro]

She should run 3rd party. The Democrat/Republican paradigm needs to be broken.

There ya go.

THAT is what the Trumpers want.

Someone like Jill Stein to siphon off Dem votes and allow Trump a chance to win re-election

So what?

If your side had a winning strategy it wouldn't even be an issue.

There ya go.

 

[Lesh]

She should run 3rd party. The Democrat/Republican paradigm needs to be broken.

There ya go.

THAT is what the Trumpers want.

Someone like Jill Stein to siphon off Dem votes and allow Trump a chance to win re-election

So what?

If your side had a winning strategy it wouldn't even be an issue.

There ya go.

Good of you to admit that your "support" of Gabbard is nothing but a Trumper strategy to get reelected.

 

[petro]

She should run 3rd party. The Democrat/Republican paradigm needs to be broken.

There ya go.

THAT is what the Trumpers want.

Someone like Jill Stein to siphon off Dem votes and allow Trump a chance to win re-election

So what?

If your side had a winning strategy it wouldn't even be an issue.

There ya go.

Good of you to admit that your "support" of Gabbard is nothing but a Trumper strategy to get reelected.

I don't support her moron.
I support her legal right to run as a third party candidate.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Democrats don't like her because she is anti war.

Most Republicans voted for the Iraq war.
And you lied about Democrats being pro war.

No he didn't lie. O continued with more wars and let's not forget the vietnam lib war or who was in charge in 1917 and 1941.

 

[pknopp]

We still trust polls? How is President Hillary doing?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She should run 3rd party. The Democrat/Republican paradigm needs to be broken.

She doesn't have the organization or funding to even continue running as a Democrat. How could she run as a third party candidate?

 

[TomParks]

I don’t believe a peter puffer is leading in Iowa....these polls are garbage

 

[Natural Citizen]

Only way to fight the rigged nomination process is to play the delegate game. That means you have to run either Republican or Democrat.

You can't do it running third party. Ballot access terms are different and it defeats the purpose.

She's not fighting the battle that people think she is. She's not running to get elected. Her lack of concern in campaign organization is clearly reflective of this.

Consider it a practice run for the 2024 and sneak attack both parties at the same time. Our folks have already proven we can run the delegate game in the GOP. And we can raise way more grassroots money. Personally, my days of that stuff are in the rear view. Two elections is enough. She's got some learning to do, though. Plus Bernie has all of the real organizers who understand that stuff on that side of the fence.

All you have to do is make it to the convention floor. They can still change the rules any way they want, though. Even after we did everything right and beat em at their own game, they still changed the rules on the convention floor and stole our delegates.

I'm just glad that there are a growing number of people on both sides of the mainstream party system who are speaking up and acting against the way the nomination process is rigged. And doing so from within the process itself.

Getting elected is one thing. But we're changing the course of history here. Or trying to. Thats the real battle.

 

[pknopp]

Only way to fight the rigged nomination process is to play the delegate game. That means you have to run either Republican or Democrat.

You can't do it running third party. Ballot access terms are different and it defeats the purpose.

She's not fighting the battle that people think she is. She's not running to get elected.

She knew she wouldn't win the nomination when she quit the unethical DNC.

 

[pyetro]

Democrats don't like her because she is anti war.

Most Republicans voted for the Iraq war.
And you lied about Democrats being pro war.

I know.
No I didnt.
Strawmen and false accusations. Quite a monday for you, dumbfuck.

Yes you did.

 

[pyetro]

Only way to fight the rigged nomination process is to play the delegate game. That means you have to run either Republican or Democrat.

You can't do it running third party. Ballot access terms are different and it defeats the purpose.

She's not fighting the battle that people think she is. She's not running to get elected.

She knew she wouldn't win the nomination when she quit the unethical DNC.

So why did she run for they nomination? Idiot.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Democrats don't like her because she is anti war.

and you are saying that even though she is antiwar republicans like her?


sure


I believe that.....