- Banned
- #1,321
It sure as hell does. Any "guest" invited into your state can then go to any other state in the union.. If the states do things in which threaten the entire union, the federal law trumps the states will to do things in which places the entire union at risk. The civil war was fought for these very reasons in which states decided to place the union at risk over the attempt to break up the union.You challenging me is idiotic at best. Did you graduate the third grade?
Where do you see the words that Congress can tell states who they can invite in as guests?
Inviting guests into your state does not endanger the nation.
And if that state does not afford that individual anything, what difference does it make?
If the state of Tennessee were to outlaw firearms, should they put a wall up around that state because Georgia did not outlaw firearms?
Did you ever hear of a guy named Benjamin Franklin? He was, most likely, the smartest American that ever lived. He once stated that he who would give up essential Liberty for the promise of temporary Safety, deserves neither Liberty nor Safety.
He probably said that because once you do give up Liberty, you end with neither Liberty nor Safety either way.
Tennesee can't outlaw firearms. That would violate the 2nd Amendment.
Here's the bottom line: The Supreme Court has ruled that the federal governent is responsible for controlling immigration. As such, that means we need to build the fucking wall.
You can't fix stupid. Of course Tennessee can't outlaw firearms ...today. It's an example. Thank you for that cowardly deflection.
You were right about one thing:
It was the United States Supreme Court that gave the federal government plenary powers over immigration. It's not a constitutional area that the feds have de jure authority over. So, maybe, some day, Tennessee can violate the Constitution. It's what you're advocating for immigration.