Trump's Treason and Impeachable Abuse of Power

[MordechaiGoodbud]

Trump received a $500 million bribe from the Chinese when they bought 1 of his resorts in Indonesia, and immediately Trump moved to endanger American security by letting a Chinese telecom company steal U.S. technology. ZTE was banned for violating U.S. sanctions against North Korea and Iran, but Trump is choosing to ignore this because all of a sudden he is concerned about a loss of Chinese jobs.

I don't understand how Trump supporters can ignore this blatant un-American decision. He is giving aid to an hostile power in exchange for money. This decision proves he cares more about his personal wealth than the safety of the chumps who voted for him, let alone the opposition.

He should immediately be impeached for treason.

He has also already abused his power in exactly the same way Nixon did. Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

See Article 1 section 1.

1 of the reasons Nixon was going to be impeached was because he sicked the IRS on the owners of the Los Angeles Times because they wrote negative editorials about him.

Well, Trump wants the postal service to double postal rates on Amazon.com because the owner also owns the Washington Post which writes negative editorials about him.

So Trump supporters...do you agree with a president that commits treason and abuses executive power?

How you would be crying, if Obama had doubled your taxes because you wrote something negative about him on USA message boards.

I know you are a bunch of hypocrites who worship at the altar of Trump.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

 

[Camp]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

 

[Mr.Blonde]

You know there is more to the ZTE story and Amazon. Com right?:

"According to the Wall Street Journal, the Chinese government would force ZTE to “make big changes in management [and] board seats” and to pay large fines. In exchange, the U.S. would drop the ban."

"However, although the ZTE deal proposal comes alongside a Chinese offer to remove tariffs on U.S. agricultural products, a Journal source said: 'The White House was meticulous in affirming that the case is a law enforcement matter and not a bargaining chip in negotiations.'”

Trump Vowed to Save ZTE's Chinese Workers. Now China and the U.S. Reportedly Have a Plan

Amazon.com:
Trump claims the post office is losing billions because of Amazon, but it's a lot more complicated

 

[Camp]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

 

[martybegan]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

 

[easyt65]

Trump received a $500 million bribe from the Chinese when they bought 1 of his resorts in Indonesia, and immediately Trump moved to endanger American security by letting a Chinese telecom company steal U.S. technology. ZTE was banned for violating U.S. sanctions against North Korea and Iran, but Trump is choosing to ignore this because all of a sudden he is concerned about a loss of Chinese jobs.

I don't understand how Trump supporters can ignore this blatant un-American decision. He is giving aid to an hostile power in exchange for money. This decision proves he cares more about his personal wealth than the safety of the chumps who voted for him, let alone the opposition.

He should immediately be impeached for treason.

He has also already abused his power in exactly the same way Nixon did. Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

See Article 1 section 1.

1 of the reasons Nixon was going to be impeached was because he sicked the IRS on the owners of the Los Angeles Times because they wrote negative editorials about him.

Well, Trump wants the postal service to double postal rates on Amazon.com because the owner also owns the Washington Post which writes negative editorials about him.

So Trump supporters...do you agree with a president that commits treason and abuses executive power?

How you would be crying, if Obama had doubled your taxes because you wrote something negative about him on USA message boards.

I know you are a bunch of hypocrites who worship at the altar of Trump.

I am just overwhelmed by the patriotism and the desire from our liberal brethren to protect this nation from corruption, crime, and enemies of the state - both foreign and domestic.

Even though they did not bat an eye for 8 years while Barry funded, supplied, armed, trained, aided, abetted, protected and defended terrorists, going as far as dragging the U.S. into 2 un-Constitutional, un-approved wars to help terrorists like Al Qaeda - who slaughtered 3,000...and 4...Americans - to take over / try to take over their own countries....

Even though they showed no concern when Barry protected ISIS Black Market oil facilities that provided ISIS 40% of their funding for terrorist attacks - like the one on Paris - or how he protected terrorist-supporting Hezbollah drug ops....

Even though they did not falter in their support / defense when Barry illegally armed Mexican Drug Cartels, resulting in the deaths of Americans....

Even though they did not question when Barry illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US SENATORS, and even USSC Justices...

Even though they did not get upset when Obama repeatedly violated both Constitution and La, surpassing any previous requirements necessary for Impeachment...

Even NOW when it has been exposed / proven - by the US IG - that Barry's Cabinet, DOJ, NIA, CIA, and FBI conspired to illegally prevent a Presidential candidate from winning and to affect a coup of the newly-elected President should he win...

You can still count on snowflakes to run to the fight to push the conspirator's message, continue to accuse the GOP without evidence, and deny until death the evidence showing the crimes of their Liberal Extremist leaders / traitors.

God bless America....

 

[martybegan]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

So impeachment to you is political?

Interesting.

 

[blackhawk]

Please encourage Pelosi and Schumer to make impeachment the primary goal of the Democratic Party for the November midterms.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There's no treason which is why only the hard core left is drooling about treason. Treason is what democrats don't like. Nazi is what democrats don't like. The world should be remade into the image of everything democrats don't like.

 

[easyt65]

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them.

Despite the fact that there is no evidence of illegal collusion BY TRUMP, that he committed any crime involving the Russians or illegally attempting to impact the 2016 election, Democrats like Maxine Waters have publicly declared if they win the House / Senate they WILL push for Impeachment...meaning the Democrats will officially put on record and in the history books that the Justification for Impeachment of a President has been lowered to 1) Defeating their party's candidate (even a proven FELON who should never have been on the ballot on election day), and 2) NOT being a member of their party.

The House of representatives does NOT, I would argue, determine the definition of treason, as such a definition has already been defined. they may decide to file Articles of Impeachment and to 'un-elect' a President - stripping the American people of the President they voted into office, but they can NOT realistically or even legally defend doing so, even if THEY call his actions 'treason'.

The Democrats have demonstrated the definition of 'treason' by Conspiring at the highest levels to prevent a candidate from winning and election and attempting to carry out a 'coup' of an elected President if he still happened to win.

The cells in Gitmo should be filled today, already, with traitors - Clinton, Obama, Mueller, Rosenstein, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok....

 

[Mr.Blonde]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

So impeachment to you is political?

Interesting.

Ultimately yes impeachment is political rather than legal. If a president is popular no matter what he has a far more leeway than an unpopular one.

 

[Camp]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

So impeachment to you is political?

Interesting.

Impeachment has always been political. Prosecutors have always had discretion and great power in determining who the prosecute and who they let escape justice.

 

[easyt65]

Please encourage Pelosi and Schumer to make impeachment the primary goal of the Democratic Party for the November midterms.

Plan 'C' of the conspiracy to ensure Trump did not get elected and to affect a coup to remove him from office if he did.

 

[martybegan]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

So impeachment to you is political?

Interesting.

Impeachment has always been political. Prosecutors has always had discretion and great power in determining who the prosecute and who they let escape justice.

But it has always been tied to breaking a specific rule or law. With Johnson it was firing a cabinet member in opposition to a specific law. for Clinton it was perjury under oath.

With Trump it right now is purely "I don't like him"

 

[Wry Catcher]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

"There is doing what democrats don't like"?

Two points: Patriots object to Trump's behavior, which is arguably a violation of Artt. II of The Constitution; and, treason, has not yet been considered, but, is not out of the question.

If two of those who have already agreed to talk to the Mueller Investigation, acknowledge Trump did in fact engage in a Conspiracy to obstruct justice into foreign attacks on our election, it might be an allegation for his impeachment, and up to the Senate to decide his guilt or innocence.

 

[martybegan]

There's no treason. There is doing what democrats don't like.

"There is doing what democrats don't like"?

Two points: Patriots object to Trump's behavior, which is arguably a violation of Artt. II of The Constitution; and, treason, has not yet been considered, but, is not out of the question.

If two of those who have already agreed to talk to the Mueller Investigation, acknowledge Trump did in fact engage in a Conspiracy to obstruct justice into foreign attacks on our election, it might be an allegation for his impeachment, and up to the Senate to decide his guilt or innocence.

The whole article?

 

[Camp]

Nope, trump has been and continues to commit acts of treason. He is not pro American, he is pro trump.

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

So impeachment to you is political?

Interesting.

Impeachment has always been political. Prosecutors has always had discretion and great power in determining who the prosecute and who they let escape justice.

But it has always been tied to breaking a specific rule or law. With Johnson it was firing a cabinet member in opposition to a specific law. for Clinton it was perjury under oath.

With Trump it right now is purely "I don't like him"

Trump has attempted to deceive about his knowledge of his campaigns connections to the Russian's and meetings with Russians. This includes his deception during a meeting with the FBI Director and meetings with other officials of the DOJ. Lying to those Federal Officials is a felony.

 

[martybegan]

Treason? Oooohhh, how delicious. Do tell!!!

The House of Representatives determines what is treason during an impeachment. It is up to them. So, if enough citizens are convinced that trump committed treason and influence their Representatives of such, he can be tried for treason according to the Constitution of the United States.

Trump has on various occasions committed what can be logically and fairly viewed as acts of treason. His meeting in the WH with Russian operatives where he shared classified information with them is one example. Of course, trump's defense is that as President he had the right to declassify the information on the spot without consulting with the Intelligence operatives and agencies harmed by his disclosure. That is treason.

His latest act with China and ZTE is another example.

So impeachment to you is political?

Interesting.

Impeachment has always been political. Prosecutors has always had discretion and great power in determining who the prosecute and who they let escape justice.

But it has always been tied to breaking a specific rule or law. With Johnson it was firing a cabinet member in opposition to a specific law. for Clinton it was perjury under oath.

With Trump it right now is purely "I don't like him"

Trump has attempted to deceive about his knowledge of his campaigns connections to the Russian's and meetings with Russians. This includes his deception during a meeting with the FBI Director and meetings with other officials of the DOJ. Lying to those Federal Officials is a felony.

When did he directly talk to Federal Officials about this?