Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It's nice that he's getting started early, being that he's already won.....Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan that should have been presented months and months ago, such as during the nominating convention, which itself was a year after the candidate first announced, which was in turn two years after the candidate indicated an interest in running.
Yawn....Funny. Trump can't even run his campaign - let alone protect American jobs or anything else. He's just a Molotov cocktail for pissed off voters.
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
Did you vote Obama?Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
What comprehensiveness? These are very simple things he is talking about. Sanders wanted to have the federal government take over the entire education system, and no questions asked... Now that Trump wants to withdraw from a treaty "HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO THAT???"
What a moron...
Trump Details 7-Point Plan to 'Protect American Jobs'
I just don't understand how ANYONE can be against this? It baffles me. Is he crass and vulgar yep sure is....but his words don't worry me anywhere near as much as Clinton's actions!
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
What comprehensiveness? These are very simple things he is talking about. Sanders wanted to have the federal government take over the entire education system, and no questions asked... Now that Trump wants to withdraw from a treaty "HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO THAT???"
What a moron...
Okay, let's go with withdrawing from a treaty.
As I said, given that Trump has zero governance experience, I want to know that he's considered those questions and impacts and has sound answers/approaches for dealing with them. I'm not going to put my vote behind him when I don't have any idea of whether those things have crossed his mind, and I'm certainly not of a mind to trust him if he doesn't, unlike other politicians, present a clear and cogent case for his proposal. Indeed, the thing that should distinguish a "non politician" from a career politician is that the former be vastly more candid with the American people. As we all know, "candor" is not at all Trump's "middle name," just as it's not that of myriad career politicians, but at least we know they do have experience addressing and considering the impacts of their proposals.
- What are the impacts of our doing so, not just on us, but also on the other parties to the treaty?
- Domestic and international economic impacts?
- Domestic and international political impacts?
- Domestic and international social impacts?
- Domestic and international legal impacts?
- As a result of the withdrawal, who will be the winners? The losers? As individuals, as classes of individuals?
- Given the foreseeable negative impacts, what mitigations are proposed to counter them?
I don't know what the plan says, but I do know that two weeks before Election Day is too late to introduce whatever Presidential-level (assuming it's even got the degree of detail one would expect of such a thing) plan it is.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
What comprehensiveness? These are very simple things he is talking about. Sanders wanted to have the federal government take over the entire education system, and no questions asked... Now that Trump wants to withdraw from a treaty "HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO THAT???"
What a moron...
Okay, let's go with withdrawing from a treaty.
As I said, given that Trump has zero governance experience, I want to know that he's considered those questions and impacts and has sound answers/approaches for dealing with them. I'm not going to put my vote behind him when I don't have any idea of whether those things have crossed his mind, and I'm certainly not of a mind to trust him if he doesn't, unlike other politicians, present a clear and cogent case for his proposal. Indeed, the thing that should distinguish a "non politician" from a career politician is that the former be vastly more candid with the American people. As we all know, "candor" is not at all Trump's "middle name," just as it's not that of myriad career politicians, but at least we know they do have experience addressing and considering the impacts of their proposals.
- What are the impacts of our doing so, not just on us, but also on the other parties to the treaty?
- Domestic and international economic impacts?
- Domestic and international political impacts?
- Domestic and international social impacts?
- Domestic and international legal impacts?
- As a result of the withdrawal, who will be the winners? The losers? As individuals, as classes of individuals?
- Given the foreseeable negative impacts, what mitigations are proposed to counter them?
I didn't know that answering all those questions was a requirement in a policy discussion. Which other politician do you hold to this standard?
No one even asked a question in Germany before importing hordes of immigrants. And now we know the effects.... Where are the questions regarding Clinton's similar policies?
Clinton is scandal after scandal so what she has is worse than experience. She is incapable of doing the job.
It takes you more than two weeks to read seven points?
That does sound like the common Hillary voter...
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
What comprehensiveness? These are very simple things he is talking about. Sanders wanted to have the federal government take over the entire education system, and no questions asked... Now that Trump wants to withdraw from a treaty "HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO THAT???"
What a moron...
Okay, let's go with withdrawing from a treaty.
As I said, given that Trump has zero governance experience, I want to know that he's considered those questions and impacts and has sound answers/approaches for dealing with them. I'm not going to put my vote behind him when I don't have any idea of whether those things have crossed his mind, and I'm certainly not of a mind to trust him if he doesn't, unlike other politicians, present a clear and cogent case for his proposal. Indeed, the thing that should distinguish a "non politician" from a career politician is that the former be vastly more candid with the American people. As we all know, "candor" is not at all Trump's "middle name," just as it's not that of myriad career politicians, but at least we know they do have experience addressing and considering the impacts of their proposals.
- What are the impacts of our doing so, not just on us, but also on the other parties to the treaty?
- Domestic and international economic impacts?
- Domestic and international political impacts?
- Domestic and international social impacts?
- Domestic and international legal impacts?
- As a result of the withdrawal, who will be the winners? The losers? As individuals, as classes of individuals?
- Given the foreseeable negative impacts, what mitigations are proposed to counter them?
I didn't know that answering all those questions was a requirement in a policy discussion. Which other politician do you hold to this standard?
No one even asked a question in Germany before importing hordes of immigrants. And now we know the effects.... Where are the questions regarding Clinton's similar policies?
Clinton is scandal after scandal so what she has is worse than experience. She is incapable of doing the job.
Red:
Already answered.
It's not about how long it takes me to read them. It's about the plan's level of comprehensiveness.
Remember, Trump is not a politician and he has no public governance experience. Just as with someone whom one might interview for any job and whom one knows lacks experience, the bar is higher on that person having to demonstrate that they they truly know well the things that will face them were they to get the job. It'd be different were he Bernie Sanders or most of his GOP competitors from the primary. I'd have the same higher expectation re: the plans presented were it Mrs. Fiorina or Dr. Carson who won the nomination.
What comprehensiveness? These are very simple things he is talking about. Sanders wanted to have the federal government take over the entire education system, and no questions asked... Now that Trump wants to withdraw from a treaty "HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO THAT???"
What a moron...
Okay, let's go with withdrawing from a treaty.
As I said, given that Trump has zero governance experience, I want to know that he's considered those questions and impacts and has sound answers/approaches for dealing with them. I'm not going to put my vote behind him when I don't have any idea of whether those things have crossed his mind, and I'm certainly not of a mind to trust him if he doesn't, unlike other politicians, present a clear and cogent case for his proposal. Indeed, the thing that should distinguish a "non politician" from a career politician is that the former be vastly more candid with the American people. As we all know, "candor" is not at all Trump's "middle name," just as it's not that of myriad career politicians, but at least we know they do have experience addressing and considering the impacts of their proposals.
- What are the impacts of our doing so, not just on us, but also on the other parties to the treaty?
- Domestic and international economic impacts?
- Domestic and international political impacts?
- Domestic and international social impacts?
- Domestic and international legal impacts?
- As a result of the withdrawal, who will be the winners? The losers? As individuals, as classes of individuals?
- Given the foreseeable negative impacts, what mitigations are proposed to counter them?
I didn't know that answering all those questions was a requirement in a policy discussion. Which other politician do you hold to this standard?
No one even asked a question in Germany before importing hordes of immigrants. And now we know the effects.... Where are the questions regarding Clinton's similar policies?
Clinton is scandal after scandal so what she has is worse than experience. She is incapable of doing the job.
Red:
Already answered.
So basically, you demand more from Trump, because he is Trump. Apparently the "experienced" politicians always consider all the impacts of their policies (wait, they don't have a clue, "You can keep your plan")
You are a stupid, dumb racist, simple as that.
What comprehensiveness? These are very simple things he is talking about. Sanders wanted to have the federal government take over the entire education system, and no questions asked... Now that Trump wants to withdraw from a treaty "HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO DO THAT???"
What a moron...
Okay, let's go with withdrawing from a treaty.
As I said, given that Trump has zero governance experience, I want to know that he's considered those questions and impacts and has sound answers/approaches for dealing with them. I'm not going to put my vote behind him when I don't have any idea of whether those things have crossed his mind, and I'm certainly not of a mind to trust him if he doesn't, unlike other politicians, present a clear and cogent case for his proposal. Indeed, the thing that should distinguish a "non politician" from a career politician is that the former be vastly more candid with the American people. As we all know, "candor" is not at all Trump's "middle name," just as it's not that of myriad career politicians, but at least we know they do have experience addressing and considering the impacts of their proposals.
- What are the impacts of our doing so, not just on us, but also on the other parties to the treaty?
- Domestic and international economic impacts?
- Domestic and international political impacts?
- Domestic and international social impacts?
- Domestic and international legal impacts?
- As a result of the withdrawal, who will be the winners? The losers? As individuals, as classes of individuals?
- Given the foreseeable negative impacts, what mitigations are proposed to counter them?
I didn't know that answering all those questions was a requirement in a policy discussion. Which other politician do you hold to this standard?
No one even asked a question in Germany before importing hordes of immigrants. And now we know the effects.... Where are the questions regarding Clinton's similar policies?
Clinton is scandal after scandal so what she has is worse than experience. She is incapable of doing the job.
Red:
Already answered.
So basically, you demand more from Trump, because he is Trump. Apparently the "experienced" politicians always consider all the impacts of their policies (wait, they don't have a clue, "You can keep your plan")
You are a stupid, dumb racist, simple as that.
Come on, paraphrase my remarks accurately or stop replying to them. It's not at all because he's Trump. It's because he's got no experience with public governance. I made that clear every time I discussed it here. I even offered examples of two others to whom I'd apply the same standard.
I don't care if it's Trump or anyone else having no experience in national or state governance. It could even be experience whereby the person goofed, at least they have some experience and will have learned from their governing mistakes just as everyone else does.
Okay, let's go with withdrawing from a treaty.
As I said, given that Trump has zero governance experience, I want to know that he's considered those questions and impacts and has sound answers/approaches for dealing with them. I'm not going to put my vote behind him when I don't have any idea of whether those things have crossed his mind, and I'm certainly not of a mind to trust him if he doesn't, unlike other politicians, present a clear and cogent case for his proposal. Indeed, the thing that should distinguish a "non politician" from a career politician is that the former be vastly more candid with the American people. As we all know, "candor" is not at all Trump's "middle name," just as it's not that of myriad career politicians, but at least we know they do have experience addressing and considering the impacts of their proposals.
- What are the impacts of our doing so, not just on us, but also on the other parties to the treaty?
- Domestic and international economic impacts?
- Domestic and international political impacts?
- Domestic and international social impacts?
- Domestic and international legal impacts?
- As a result of the withdrawal, who will be the winners? The losers? As individuals, as classes of individuals?
- Given the foreseeable negative impacts, what mitigations are proposed to counter them?
I didn't know that answering all those questions was a requirement in a policy discussion. Which other politician do you hold to this standard?
No one even asked a question in Germany before importing hordes of immigrants. And now we know the effects.... Where are the questions regarding Clinton's similar policies?
Clinton is scandal after scandal so what she has is worse than experience. She is incapable of doing the job.
Red:
Already answered.
So basically, you demand more from Trump, because he is Trump. Apparently the "experienced" politicians always consider all the impacts of their policies (wait, they don't have a clue, "You can keep your plan")
You are a stupid, dumb racist, simple as that.
Come on, paraphrase my remarks accurately or stop replying to them. It's not at all because he's Trump. It's because he's got no experience with public governance. I made that clear every time I discussed it here. I even offered examples of two others to whom I'd apply the same standard.
I don't care if it's Trump or anyone else having no experience in national or state governance. It could even be experience whereby the person goofed, at least they have some experience and will have learned from their governing mistakes just as everyone else does.
Yes, Hillary has learned so much from her mistakes! That's what the scandal after scandal proves indeed...
You have no case, at all...
I didn't know that answering all those questions was a requirement in a policy discussion. Which other politician do you hold to this standard?
No one even asked a question in Germany before importing hordes of immigrants. And now we know the effects.... Where are the questions regarding Clinton's similar policies?
Clinton is scandal after scandal so what she has is worse than experience. She is incapable of doing the job.
Red:
Already answered.
So basically, you demand more from Trump, because he is Trump. Apparently the "experienced" politicians always consider all the impacts of their policies (wait, they don't have a clue, "You can keep your plan")
You are a stupid, dumb racist, simple as that.
Come on, paraphrase my remarks accurately or stop replying to them. It's not at all because he's Trump. It's because he's got no experience with public governance. I made that clear every time I discussed it here. I even offered examples of two others to whom I'd apply the same standard.
I don't care if it's Trump or anyone else having no experience in national or state governance. It could even be experience whereby the person goofed, at least they have some experience and will have learned from their governing mistakes just as everyone else does.
Yes, Hillary has learned so much from her mistakes! That's what the scandal after scandal proves indeed...
You have no case, at all...
Oh, Lord. There it is. The very instant a Trumkin no longer can defend Trump, they change the object of the discussion to someone else. Well, I'm not going to be a party to that. I'm happy to stay on topic and discuss the sufficiency and completeness, or lack thereof, of Trump's plan as that is the topic of the thread. If you want to introduce a new person to discuss, fine, but you'll have that discussion with someone else.
We began this discussion when you asserted that withdrawing from a treaty is a simple thing. I showed that it's not and that there is a lot more to consider than merely withdrawing from it. We even have a real-world example of the complexity of doing that: Brexit. Go take a look at the level of detail the Brits covered in the runup to the Brexit vote. Then compare it with what Trump has shared about his treaty withdrawal proposals. I also expressed very clearly why I require more detail up front of Trump, or any other would be public policy novice. If you have no topically direct and cogent refutation of those points, we're done.
So basically, you demand more from Trump, because he is Trump. Apparently the "experienced" politicians always consider all the impacts of their policies (wait, they don't have a clue, "You can keep your plan")
You are a stupid, dumb racist, simple as that.
Come on, paraphrase my remarks accurately or stop replying to them. It's not at all because he's Trump. It's because he's got no experience with public governance. I made that clear every time I discussed it here. I even offered examples of two others to whom I'd apply the same standard.
I don't care if it's Trump or anyone else having no experience in national or state governance. It could even be experience whereby the person goofed, at least they have some experience and will have learned from their governing mistakes just as everyone else does.
Yes, Hillary has learned so much from her mistakes! That's what the scandal after scandal proves indeed...
You have no case, at all...
Oh, Lord. There it is. The very instant a Trumkin no longer can defend Trump, they change the object of the discussion to someone else. Well, I'm not going to be a party to that. I'm happy to stay on topic and discuss the sufficiency and completeness, or lack thereof, of Trump's plan as that is the topic of the thread. If you want to introduce a new person to discuss, fine, but you'll have that discussion with someone else.
We began this discussion when you asserted that withdrawing from a treaty is a simple thing. I showed that it's not and that there is a lot more to consider than merely withdrawing from it. We even have a real-world example of the complexity of doing that: Brexit. Go take a look at the level of detail the Brits covered in the runup to the Brexit vote. Then compare it with what Trump has shared about his treaty withdrawal proposals. I also expressed very clearly why I require more detail up front of Trump, or any other would be public policy novice. If you have no topically direct and cogent refutation of those points, we're done.
Withdrawing from the treaty is a simple thing... duh...
You just want to bring an extremely detailed analysis into it, something you didn't ask for when entering the treaty. That because "Trump's experience"... laughable. Either talk about the policy as usually, or get out of here. Trump's experience has nothing to do with the matter.
