Truly Hilarious? Left crying obama is being blamed while still blaming Reagan/Bush

[bedowin62]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

 

[occupied]

It's because history does not begin in 2008. So much of the blame you people place on Obama is like blaming the clean-up crew for the puddles of puke after a wild frat party. Republicans are not going to be able to absolve themselves of their culpability in problems that have festered for decades just because they have no memory.

 

[Obiwan]

It's because history does not begin in 2008. So much of the blame you people place on Obama is like blaming the clean-up crew for the puddles of puke after a wild frat party. Republicans are not going to be able to absolve themselves of their culpability in problems that have festered for decades just because they have no memory.

But according to lefties, Obozo has no history, right???

 

[Pete7469]

The bed wetters will never own up for the destruction they cause.

I just don't know why these sniveling parasites can't just take their filthy asses to North Korea. Everything they want is already there.

 

[occupied]

It's because history does not begin in 2008. So much of the blame you people place on Obama is like blaming the clean-up crew for the puddles of puke after a wild frat party. Republicans are not going to be able to absolve themselves of their culpability in problems that have festered for decades just because they have no memory.

But according to lefties, Obozo has no history, right???
View attachment 48212

No, he has just done the best he can with what he was given, a shattered economy, a couple of wars no one wanted anymore and a congress bent on destroying him. In spite of that he has done very well.

 

[bedowin62]

It's because history does not begin in 2008. So much of the blame you people place on Obama is like blaming the clean-up crew for the puddles of puke after a wild frat party. Republicans are not going to be able to absolve themselves of their culpability in problems that have festered for decades just because they have no memory.

note to leftard; history doesnt begin with reagan either.

but since you mention timeframes leftard. when DOES obama's watch start? and when CAN he be held responsible for things that have happened or are happening on his watch?

 

[Obiwan]

It's because history does not begin in 2008. So much of the blame you people place on Obama is like blaming the clean-up crew for the puddles of puke after a wild frat party. Republicans are not going to be able to absolve themselves of their culpability in problems that have festered for decades just because they have no memory.

But according to lefties, Obozo has no history, right???
View attachment 48212

No, he has just done the best he can with what he was given, a shattered economy, a couple of wars no one wanted anymore and a congress bent on destroying him. In spite of that he has done very well.

More like he's doing the best he can after being a rabble-rousing community organizer with no real job experience.

 

[bodecea]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

 

[bedowin62]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

really?

who said that?

 

[Obiwan]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

Part of it is.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

Well to be fair to the RWs, President Clinton did leave a balanced budget and a budget surplus. That is most definitely his fault and he should be held responsible for it.

And President Obama should be held responsible for job creation, economic recovery, cutting the deficit, pulling the country from the edge of disaster, saving the US auto industry, making health insurance affordable to millions, saving countless people's homes, killing bin Laden and more terrorists than any other prez and so much more. No way should he get a pass for these actions.

 

[Obiwan]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

Well to be fair to the RWs, President Clinton did leave a balanced budget and a budget surplus. That is most definitely his fault and he should be held responsible for it.

And President Obama should be held responsible for job creation, economic recovery, cutting the deficit, pulling the country from the edge of disaster, saving the US auto industry, making health insurance affordable to millions, saving countless people's homes, killing bin Laden and more terrorists than any other prez and so much more. No way should he get a pass for these actions.

Right, no pass.
Poverty Level Under Obama Breaks 50-Year Record

 

[bodecea]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

really?

who said that?

Many many posters...particularly between 2000 and 2008.

 

[bedowin62]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

Well to be fair to the RWs, President Clinton did leave a balanced budget and a budget surplus. That is most definitely his fault and he should be held responsible for it.

And President Obama should be held responsible for job creation, economic recovery, cutting the deficit, pulling the country from the edge of disaster, saving the US auto industry, making health insurance affordable to millions, saving countless people's homes, killing bin Laden and more terrorists than any other prez and so much more. No way should he get a pass for these actions.

why do left-wingers come there thinking they are making a point when all they are doing is regurgitating the same false, tired talking points???????

clinton didnt leave a surplus. he didnt balance the budget either; Republicans holding the budget purse strings in Congress did

 

[bodecea]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

Part of it is.

And....Obiwan.

 

[Meathead]

No, he has just done the best he can with what he was given, a shattered economy, a couple of wars no one wanted anymore and a congress bent on destroying him. In spite of that he has done very well.

You mean a congress with a Democrat supermajority bent on destroying him? WTF is wrong with you? Ignorant are just stupid?

 

[bedowin62]

lmao!!

The Progressive hypocrisy train never stops! why is it wrong to criticize obama for things happening on his watch? remember when "on his watch" meant everything to left-wingers? but somehow it's ok for left-wings to rant about Reagan, who is dead and governed thirty something years ago??

Silly....when, as we've been frequently told, it's all Clinton's fault.

really?

who said that?

Many many posters...particularly between 2000 and 2008.

what did they blame him for?

 

[Wildman]

It's because history does not begin in 2008. So much of the blame you people place on Obama is like blaming the clean-up crew for the puddles of puke after a wild frat party. Republicans are not going to be able to absolve themselves of their culpability in problems that have festered for decades just because they have no memory.

this qualifies as most stupid post of the day!!

................

 

[Wildman]

No, he has just done the best he can with what he was given,

does that also apply to George W. Bush ?????????????

 

[Wildman]

President Clinton did leave a balanced budget and a budget surplus.

THAT has been proven to be you liberfools biggest LIES!!