Zone1 True Racial Realism

IM2

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 11, 2015
77,148
34,446
2,330
It seems that some clarification needs to be done on matters of race. We have heard the various beliefs and opinions, but perhaps doing some fact finding would be the best start at creating a solution.

Let's start with this:

Race is a categorization of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into groups generally viewed as distinct within a given society. The term came into common usage during the 16th century, when it was used to refer to groups of various kinds, including those characterized by close kinship relations. By the 17th century, the term began to refer to physical (phenotypical) traits, and then later to national affiliations. Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society. While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning. The concept of race is foundational to racism, the belief that humans can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.

Social conceptions and groupings of races have varied over time, often involving folk taxonomies that define essential types of individuals based on perceived traits. Modern scientists consider such biological essentialism obsolete, and generally discourage racial explanations for collective differentiation in both physical and behavioral traits.

Even though there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptions of race are untenable, scientists around the world continue to conceptualize race in widely differing ways. While some researchers continue to use the concept of race to make distinctions among fuzzy sets of traits or observable differences in behavior, others in the scientific community suggest that the idea of race is inherently naive or simplistic. Still others argue that, among humans, race has no taxonomic significance because all living humans belong to the same subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens.

Since the second half of the 20th century, race has been associated with discredited theories of scientific racism, and has become increasingly seen as a largely pseudoscientific system of classification. Although still used in general contexts, race has often been replaced by less ambiguous and/or loaded terms: populations, people(s), ethnic groups, or communities, depending on context. Its use in genetics was formally renounced by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in 2023.

So to start with, all arguments claiming genetic superiority/inferiority in any way, by any person of any race has no merit. One can make the argument that because blacks were bred and disabled, mentally handicapped or physically handicapped kids were generally not allowed to survive, according to NASEM, genetics are irrelevant.
 
1ca30078-7f40-4bb8-90e2-9b50d5dfce9c_text.gif


There is just one race....The rest is ethnic issues.
 
The modern concept of race emerged as a product of the colonial enterprises of European powers from the 16th to 18th centuries which identified race in terms of skin color and physical differences. Author Rebecca F. Kennedy argues that the Greeks and Romans would have found such concepts confusing in relation to their own systems of classification. According to Bancel et al., the epistemological moment where the modern concept of race was invented and rationalized lies somewhere between 1730 and 1790.


This is when the race card was first created.
 
A person's race can usually be determined by appearance, and always by DNA analysis. Race realism is the belief that the three major races differ significantly in average intelligence, and inclinations toward crime and monogamy, and that these differences are the result of evolving for thousands of year in response to different population pressures. Cold climates select genetically for intelligence and monogamy. Civilizations select genetically for intelligence and obedience to the law.

An excellent introduction to race realism is Professor J. Philippe Rushton's essay "Race, Evolution, and Behavior."

 
What follows is true race realism. Although race realism is suppressed now, it was the consensus before the civil rights movement made it fashionable to lie about what is obvious to anyone with extensive experience with the three major races, and dangerous to tell the truth.

-----------

RACE, EVOLUTION AND BEHAVIOR: A Life History Perspective​

2nd Special Abridged Edition
by Professor J. Philippe Rushton
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2


Modern science shows a three-way pattern of race differences in both physical traits and behavior. On average, Orientals are slower to mature, less fertile, less sexually active, less aggressive, and have larger brains and higher IQ scores. Blacks are at the other pole. Whites fall in the middle, but closer to Orientals than to Blacks...

Race differences start in the womb. Blacks are born earlier and grow quicker than Whites and Orientals. The three-way race pattern occurs in milestones such as sexual maturity, family stability, crime rates, and population growth...

Race differences exist in sexual behavior. The races differ in how often they like to have sexual intercourse. This affects rates of sexually transmitted diseases. On all the counts, Orientals are the least sexually active, Blacks the most, and Whites are in between...

IQ tests measure intelligence and predict real life success. The races differ in brain size and on IQ tests. On average Orientals have the largest brains and highest IQs. Blacks average the lowest, and Whites fall in between. The brain size differences explain the IQ differences both within groups and between groups...
A number of studies show that race differences are caused by both genes and environment. Heritabilities, cross-race adoptions, genetic weights, and regression-to-the-average all tell the same story. Cross-race adoptions give some of the best proof that the genes cause race differences in IQ...

The theory of r-K life histories explains the worldwide three-way pattern in race differences. The r-strategy means being very sexually active and having many offspring. The K-strategy means having fewer offspring, but with both mother and father giving them more care. Humans are the most K strategists of all species. Among humans, Orientals follow the most K-strategy, Blacks the most r-strategy, and Whites fall in between.

The latest theory of human origins -- Out-of-Africa -- provides the final piece to the puzzle. It explains why r-K theory accounts for race differences in body, brain, and behavior. As races moved out of Africa they evolved away from r-type behaviors and toward K- type. Moving out of Africa meant increasing brain size and IQ, but lowering reproduction, aggression and sexual activity.


----------

Professor Rushton was a brave man who was often persecuted. Nevertheless, his assertions are thoroughly documented and obvious to high school guidance counselors. He has never been refuted. Anti racists try to suppress a debate they know they will lose, because their opinions cannot survive critical scrutiny.

If I was a high school civics or biology teacher I would want assign my class to read the essay "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," but of course I would not be allowed to. This essay, and Professor Rushton's book by the same name, along with the writings of Charles Murray and Jared Taylor provide an important balance to critical race theory.

I only disagree with two of his assertions. He thinks different climates are the only reasons for racial differences in non cosmetic average characteristics. I think civilization was also important.

In civilizations intelligent men tend to become more prosperous than unintelligent men. Until very recently, they had more children who survived and reproduced.

Moreover, during most of history in civilized countries most criminals were killed at the scene to the crime, they died in custody, or they were executed. There was no effort at rehabilitation. It has never been very effective. The few children some criminals had rarely lived to adulthood.

Consequently, civilizations have, until very recently, selected genetically for intelligence and obedience to the law.

Finally, he thinks the break from Negroes and everyone else happened about 100,000 years ago. DNA analysis and paleontology indicates a more recent date, perhaps 60,000 years ago.
 
A person's race can usually be determined by appearance, and always by DNA analysis. Race realism is the belief that the three major races differ significantly in average intelligence, and inclinations toward crime and monogamy, and that these differences are the result of evolving for thousands of year in response to different population pressures. Cold climates select genetically for intelligence and monogamy. Civilizations select genetically for intelligence and obedience to the law.

An excellent introduction to race realism is Professor J. Philippe Rushton's essay "Race, Evolution, and Behavior."

I watched one of those cold case solved shows on a cable channel. They solved the the case via DNA from a hair a "mongoloid" hair. Their words not mine.
 
ral traits.

Even though there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptions of race are untenable, scientists around the world continue to conceptualize race in widely differing ways. While some researchers continue to use the concept of race to make distinctions among fuzzy sets of traits or observable differences in behavior, others in the scientific community suggest that the idea of race is inherently naive or simplistic. Still others argue that, among humans, race has no taxonomic significance because all living humans belong to the same subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens.

Since the second half of the 20th century, race has been associated with discredited theories of scientific racism, and has become increasingly seen as a largely pseudoscientific system of classification. Although still used in general contexts, race has often been replaced by less ambiguous and/or loaded terms: populations, people(s), ethnic groups, or communities, depending on context. Its use in genetics was formally renounced by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in 2023.

So to start with, all arguments claiming genetic superiority/inferiority in any way, by any person of any race has no merit.
"The Inequality Taboo," by Charles Murray, Commentary, September 2005

The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, "racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance."

Lewontin's position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels.In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong.

Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race orethnicity. In the most recent, published this year, all but five of the 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their self identified ethnic group. When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genetic information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.


------------

I wish Charles Murray had named the experiment he mentioned, and posted a web address. Nevertheless, it is a good experiment for two reasons. First, it is double blind. Those doing DNA research on the test subjects did not know which race they considered themselves to belong to. Second, it is an experiment that can easily be repeated.

We we acknowledge that race is an authentic biological category, It makes sense to see how the various races differ in average durable characteristics important to civilization. These are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top