Old Rocks
Diamond Member
I would like you to go debate the people at Skeptical science and make them looks like idiots---Like you're making most of the warmers here. That would do some good as they're the more hard core knowledgeable ones. I will be reading of course.
Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined
If you win there then no one here can even start to touch your theories...Next you should go up against hansen and friends. Face to face.
To much hostility at skeptical science for me. I have been there and entered into discussions and not enjoyed the exchange at all. I will say that I never had a point disproven, nor did anyone ever point out and then prove a misapplied law of physics. Like I said, I can do the math, but in no way enjoy it. A discussion at skeptical science involves much debunking of mathematical sleight of hand. It just takes to much time and isn't worth the effort because as you said, they are hard core believers and if God himself came down from the sky riding a fiery charriot and told them that they were wrong, they would ask for proof that he was God.
I am not looking for any sort of fame. I am just a guy (and not the only one by the way) who has done the math and seen for myself that the hypotheses put forward by warmists fail at the most fundamental level.
And then there are the all those physicists that just don't know their craft, right, Bent? Since I was a teenager over half a century ago, I have seen people come out with all sorts of fancy math and hypothesis showing relitivity was wrong. And there was a conspriacy among all the scientists to keep them from publisizing their hypothesis.
I see no differance between you and them, Bent. Fancy talk, but no submissions to real science publications.