Tranny discrimination case reaches Supreme Court

Polishprince

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2016
45,454
34,957
3,615
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender


Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender


Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender


Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!


SO, science confirmed what we ALL know all along, homosexuality is learned behavior.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

The EXTREME promotion of homosexuality to children is no different than the Hitler Youth, indoctrination.
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender
It is about mental illness.
 
If that is what you're getting from my post, you are in serious need reading comprehension tutoring.
You were asked that same question by another poster and then deflected it away with some nonsense about who is the husband and wife in a gay marriage (or if there are any at all).

It's not my comprehension that needs work. It's you inability to answer a simple question.
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender


Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!


SO, science confirmed what we ALL know all along, homosexuality is learned behavior.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

The EXTREME promotion of homosexuality to children is no different than the Hitler Youth, indoctrination.
First of all this thread is about transgender rights so it's a mystery why you're posting about the causes of homosexuality

Secondly, the fact that no specific gay gene has been identified does not mean that it is strictly a learned behavior. In fact, the paper that you linked to states that that same sex attractions result from numerous complex factors including biological factors. Apparently you didn't read beyond the tittle and if you did, you did not understand much.

This is what you missed. The link in the PBS News page that you posted:

Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior | Science

CONCLUSION
Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. Overlap with genetic influences on other traits provides insights into the underlying biology of same-sex sexual behavior, and analysis of different aspects of sexual preference underscore its complexity and call into question the validity of bipolar continuum measures such as the Kinsey scale. Nevertheless, many uncertainties remain to be explored, including how sociocultural influences on sexual preference might interact with genetic influences. To help communicate our study to the broader public, we organized workshops in which representatives of the public, activists, and researchers discussed the rationale, results, and implications of our stud

You should feel very foolish
 
The She-Male plaintiff is claiming that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects Gender Bender guys who wear dresses and say they are broads.

I just don't think that's true. The only lib promoting tranny rights in 1964 was Gore Vidal, and Mr. Vidal wasn't in Congress.

I just don't see the Republican Party in 1964 pushing this through and providing the votes for the Civil Rights Act if it promoted sexual deviancy.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ill_be_heard_by_supreme_court_in_october.html
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender


Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!


SO, science confirmed what we ALL know all along, homosexuality is learned behavior.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

The EXTREME promotion of homosexuality to children is no different than the Hitler Youth, indoctrination.
First of all this thread is about transgender rights so it's a mystery why you're posting about the causes of homosexuality

Secondly, the fact that no specific gay gene has been identified does not mean that it is strictly a learned behavior. In fact, the paper that you linked to states that that same sex attractions result from numerous complex factors including biological factors. Apparently you didn't read beyond the tittle and if you did, you did not understand much.

This is what you missed. The link in the PBS News page that you posted:

Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior | Science

CONCLUSION
Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. Overlap with genetic influences on other traits provides insights into the underlying biology of same-sex sexual behavior, and analysis of different aspects of sexual preference underscore its complexity and call into question the validity of bipolar continuum measures such as the Kinsey scale. Nevertheless, many uncertainties remain to be explored, including how sociocultural influences on sexual preference might interact with genetic influences. To help communicate our study to the broader public, we organized workshops in which representatives of the public, activists, and researchers discussed the rationale, results, and implications of our stud

You should feel very foolish


Transgender is just part of homosexuality. The idea of "drag queens" has been prominent in the homo community since the days of Sodom.

A male who is attracting to "women" who have penises is a homosexual, regardless of how that She Male pretends to represent himself.
 
Being transgender is not about sexuality, it is , well........about gender


Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!


SO, science confirmed what we ALL know all along, homosexuality is learned behavior.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

The EXTREME promotion of homosexuality to children is no different than the Hitler Youth, indoctrination.
First of all this thread is about transgender rights so it's a mystery why you're posting about the causes of homosexuality

Secondly, the fact that no specific gay gene has been identified does not mean that it is strictly a learned behavior. In fact, the paper that you linked to states that that same sex attractions result from numerous complex factors including biological factors. Apparently you didn't read beyond the tittle and if you did, you did not understand much.

This is what you missed. The link in the PBS News page that you posted:

Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior | Science

CONCLUSION
Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. Overlap with genetic influences on other traits provides insights into the underlying biology of same-sex sexual behavior, and analysis of different aspects of sexual preference underscore its complexity and call into question the validity of bipolar continuum measures such as the Kinsey scale. Nevertheless, many uncertainties remain to be explored, including how sociocultural influences on sexual preference might interact with genetic influences. To help communicate our study to the broader public, we organized workshops in which representatives of the public, activists, and researchers discussed the rationale, results, and implications of our stud

You should feel very foolish


Transgender is just part of homosexuality. The idea of "drag queens" has been prominent in the homo community since the days of Sodom.

A male who is attracting to "women" who have penises is a homosexual, regardless of how that She Male pretends to represent himself.
You certainly have some ridiculous ideas.
 
If that is what you're getting from my post, you are in serious need reading comprehension tutoring.
You were asked that same question by another poster and then deflected it away with some nonsense about who is the husband and wife in a gay marriage (or if there are any at all).

It's not my comprehension that needs work. It's you inability to answer a simple question.
It most certainly is a "simple " question.
 
Sure, it has to do a whole lot with sexuality.

She-males are a particular sexual preference that some guys go for but the vast majority just don't.

If Gallup were to poll even liberal fellows, they would find that even most of those guys prefer women without penises.
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!


SO, science confirmed what we ALL know all along, homosexuality is learned behavior.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

The EXTREME promotion of homosexuality to children is no different than the Hitler Youth, indoctrination.
First of all this thread is about transgender rights so it's a mystery why you're posting about the causes of homosexuality

Secondly, the fact that no specific gay gene has been identified does not mean that it is strictly a learned behavior. In fact, the paper that you linked to states that that same sex attractions result from numerous complex factors including biological factors. Apparently you didn't read beyond the tittle and if you did, you did not understand much.

This is what you missed. The link in the PBS News page that you posted:

Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior | Science

CONCLUSION
Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. Overlap with genetic influences on other traits provides insights into the underlying biology of same-sex sexual behavior, and analysis of different aspects of sexual preference underscore its complexity and call into question the validity of bipolar continuum measures such as the Kinsey scale. Nevertheless, many uncertainties remain to be explored, including how sociocultural influences on sexual preference might interact with genetic influences. To help communicate our study to the broader public, we organized workshops in which representatives of the public, activists, and researchers discussed the rationale, results, and implications of our stud

You should feel very foolish


Transgender is just part of homosexuality. The idea of "drag queens" has been prominent in the homo community since the days of Sodom.

A male who is attracting to "women" who have penises is a homosexual, regardless of how that She Male pretends to represent himself.
You certainly have some ridiculous ideas.



So, what are you trying to say? That males who like Chicks with Dicks are somehow normative in your view? And its somehow "ridiculous" to suggest they are LGBTQ?
 
Says the "expert "on gender and sexuality who thinks that in same sex relationships, one is the "husband" and one is the "wife" Yes you said it!!


SO, science confirmed what we ALL know all along, homosexuality is learned behavior.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

The EXTREME promotion of homosexuality to children is no different than the Hitler Youth, indoctrination.
First of all this thread is about transgender rights so it's a mystery why you're posting about the causes of homosexuality

Secondly, the fact that no specific gay gene has been identified does not mean that it is strictly a learned behavior. In fact, the paper that you linked to states that that same sex attractions result from numerous complex factors including biological factors. Apparently you didn't read beyond the tittle and if you did, you did not understand much.

This is what you missed. The link in the PBS News page that you posted:

Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior | Science

CONCLUSION
Same-sex sexual behavior is influenced by not one or a few genes but many. Overlap with genetic influences on other traits provides insights into the underlying biology of same-sex sexual behavior, and analysis of different aspects of sexual preference underscore its complexity and call into question the validity of bipolar continuum measures such as the Kinsey scale. Nevertheless, many uncertainties remain to be explored, including how sociocultural influences on sexual preference might interact with genetic influences. To help communicate our study to the broader public, we organized workshops in which representatives of the public, activists, and researchers discussed the rationale, results, and implications of our stud

You should feel very foolish


Transgender is just part of homosexuality. The idea of "drag queens" has been prominent in the homo community since the days of Sodom.

A male who is attracting to "women" who have penises is a homosexual, regardless of how that She Male pretends to represent himself.
You certainly have some ridiculous ideas.



So, what are you trying to say? That males who like Chicks with Dicks are somehow normative in your view? And its somehow "ridiculous" to suggest they are LGBTQ?
I am not "trying to say" anything .I am saying that you have bizarre ideas and a piss poor understand of human sexuality .
 

Forum List

Back
Top