Too long ignored?

Any stimulus funds that went for shovel-ready infrastructure were a drop in the bucket. Just watch the fucking documentary, genius. This isn't a political issue.


The repairs may be desparately needed, but, seriously, the thieves in DC just spent a Trillion dollars to fix things and all they did was bribe their cronies and reward their sycophants.

How much more graft and corruption needs to go unchecked in this?

It would be nice if we had honest citizen Senators and Congressmen, but sadly, they are all venemous and corrupt jackels who live to steal and will will sell their daughters, wives and mothers into prostitution for a compaign contribution.

As long as we need to pass the repair money through the hands of those that just can't seem to function without a payoff, we're screwed.

The stimulus money did not go for pay offs (mostly) but it did get used in many state and local budgets to replace falling revenues. Few actual infrastructure projects have been funded.

My ex worked for Westinghouse back in the '80s, repairing signals on railroad lines. I assume you guys know this is the preferred method of moving toxic waste, like nuclear rods? Those lines are in terrible condition.

A disaster or two is inevitable if we do not wake the fuck up.



We just more a few truckloads of railroad switches from Kansas City to Chicago that were paid for by stimulus.

They were top of the line diamond plated chrome...the guys who unloaded the said a normal switch cost a thousand dollars each...these were $8500 each...bought with stimulus money.

These were union railroad builders in Chicago, and even they were appalled.
 
"The Crumbling of America" can be seen on The History Channel from 5PM to 7PM (edt) today.

This is a HUGE wakeup call.

America's infrastructure is collapsing. Tens of thousands of bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. A third of the nation's highways are in poor or mediocre shape. Massively leaking water and sewage systems are creating health hazards and contaminating rivers and streams. Weakened and under-maintained levees and dams tower over communities and schools. And the power grid is increasingly maxed out, disrupting millions of lives and putting entire cities in the dark. The Crumbling of America explores these problems using expert interviews, on location shooting and computer generated animation to illustrate the kinds of infrastructure disasters that could be just around the bend.
This type of assumption is inaccurate. Bridges all across the US are monintored for wear-and-tear by county highway departments under the supervision of the highway engineers. and funds are available to make repairs or perform maintenance in a timely manner. The number of bridges in a single county is much greater than the average person would believe. Bridge failures rarely are a result of maintenance failures or lack of repairs. They are usually engineering failures.

A third of the nations highways being in mediocre (average") condition is not a failure of maintenance, it is a statistical likelihood.

There is very very little leakage of potable water lines, just not out there.
Sewerage problems are presently under a system of funding that allows them to be inspected constantly and repairs to be made as problems are discovered, and local authorities apply for and get partial funding for all work. There is presently in effect a system in which cities/towns are banned from adding any new residential development until they attain those standards, which in effect limits their growth and their taxing base with they desperately need. It is a self adjusting system, of sticks and carrots. Our streams are the cleanest they've been since the expansion west.

"Weakened and under-maintained levees and dams tower over communities and schools" Not likely. Sure corruption occurs like in New Orleans where money for maintenance and improvements of levees are sidetracked by corrupt politicians who pocket the money, or use it to buy their elections, but very very few schools are built in vulnerable valley drainage systems. Why not focus on those? Punish the owners of the dams with ongoing fines, or require they be drained down to safer levels.

The power grid? why not encourage its development and improvement rather than discouraging it? No electrical utility company wants their capacity to become strained. The worse case is California, and they inhibit the growth of electrical utilities, forcing the import of their electrical power from state further east. It's a political/ governing problem first of all.

What should Ohio do with $8 billion in stimulus money? Search the list of proposed projects | cleveland.com

Some Ohio roads, and those in other states, reverting to gravel because repairs are too costly | cleveland.com

Bridge collapse: Could it happen here? | cleveland.com

This kind of thing is happening all over the country, and states alone simply can't afford to pick up the tab for all the repairs needed. Vermont and New York shared the cost of building a new bridge to replace one of only two across Lake Champlain. When the old bridge (built in 1929) was demolished because of unsafe conditions, it was quite a hardship on people who worked in one state or the other and used the bridge to commute. It's not like there were a lot of other options.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/us/24bridge.html
 
AllieBabba said:
Actually, we don't know where the hell the stimulus money has gone. It has disappeared. Surprise, surprise.

Oh I don't know about that. Not two miles from where I live, where a stretch of US Route 7 winds through town and has had to accommodate 16-wheelers traveling winding two-way stretches of pot-holed surface routes, a brand spanking new four-lane diversion for the next 10 miles has just been completed. Thanks to stimulus funds.

I'm sure if you bothered to LQQK, you would find millions of examples of the proof you seem to think doesn't exist.
 
They had the chance to put it right. It is not the taxpayers fault that they pissed our money away. You can't keep expecting the taxpayer to be a bottomless cash well for corrupt politicians. Next time, perhaps you should vote better and stop putting these bastards in office.

Find me politicians (potential new lawmakers) who won't become corrupt due to corporate lobbyists running the show, and they will all have my vote. That they just SAY so becomes mere drivel in less than a year in office because they soon get swept up in the money game.

Again, this conversation is getting steered toward US vs. THEM, when this is a major, MAJOR problem that, yes, can only be solved by taxes, but one that every single American (even those living abroad, if they care at all) should start paying serious attention to as a Number One Priority. A "stimulus" package meant only to jump start a flailing economy doesn't even amount to a decent bandaid on the larger, permanent, long-term problems.

Congress and national groups examine the infrastructure needs of the United States. - Free Online Library
American Society of Civil Engineers ) estimates that the backlog of deficient bridges alone will cost $9.4 billion a year for 20 years. The cost of repairing and maintaining roads, water facilities and the electrical grid bring the ASCE estimate of needed investment of $1.6 trillion over 5 years to restore the nation's infrastructure.

If every single American should care then EVERY single AMerican needs to pay Federal Income Taxes. As it is only 50% of us do that and the other 50% don't. So, don't expect us to swallow your bullshit hook line and sinker. find a way to tax those who don't pay. that'll give ya some more money to piss away.

And how much in "taxes" would someone earning $20,000 a year generate for the treasury? That argument has gotten so old (and so unsubstantiated), it's grown whiskers. How about petitioning your own legislators to fix the tax code so that Exxon-Mobil doesn't get to pay ZERO in taxes on $16 billion? I do believe their fair share alone would pick up the slack for low-income people who pay none.
 
AmericanHorse could be 100% correct, MaggieMae. Mebbe the History Channel produced a heavily biased piece, I dunno. The only industry I have much familiarity with is the railroads and they are unique. They own their lines, but there's so much government investment they almost seem like a public utility.

If The History Channel is now seen as biased, I'd like to know why. What's in it for them?
 
we've already heard this story, nearly two years ago when they passed the "unread" "emergency" stimulus funds to take care of the infrastructure and put people to work doing "shovel ready" jobs. we ain't falling for that shit a second time. get over it.

Any stimulus funds that went for shovel-ready infrastructure were a drop in the bucket. Just watch the fucking documentary, genius. This isn't a political issue.
You're wasting your breath. Wingnuts aren't going to let facts or science get in the way of their extreme ideology.
 
Reading this thread it seems as though among other things being said Madeline is saying that anyone who gets elected into office will be a crook so she may as well keep voting in HER crook.
 
The repairs may be desparately needed, but, seriously, the thieves in DC just spent a Trillion dollars to fix things and all they did was bribe their cronies and reward their sycophants.

How much more graft and corruption needs to go unchecked in this?

It would be nice if we had honest citizen Senators and Congressmen, but sadly, they are all venemous and corrupt jackels who live to steal and will will sell their daughters, wives and mothers into prostitution for a compaign contribution.

As long as we need to pass the repair money through the hands of those that just can't seem to function without a payoff, we're screwed.

The stimulus money did not go for pay offs (mostly) but it did get used in many state and local budgets to replace falling revenues. Few actual infrastructure projects have been funded.

My ex worked for Westinghouse back in the '80s, repairing signals on railroad lines. I assume you guys know this is the preferred method of moving toxic waste, like nuclear rods? Those lines are in terrible condition.

A disaster or two is inevitable if we do not wake the fuck up.



We just more a few truckloads of railroad switches from Kansas City to Chicago that were paid for by stimulus.

They were top of the line diamond plated chrome...the guys who unloaded the said a normal switch cost a thousand dollars each...these were $8500 each...bought with stimulus money.

These were union railroad builders in Chicago, and even they were appalled.

I can't find any source for that by Googling diamond plated chrome railroad switches from Kansas City to Chicago paid for by stimulus.

Perhaps you have a credible source?
 
we've already heard this story, nearly two years ago when they passed the "unread" "emergency" stimulus funds to take care of the infrastructure and put people to work doing "shovel ready" jobs. we ain't falling for that shit a second time. get over it.

Any stimulus funds that went for shovel-ready infrastructure were a drop in the bucket. Just watch the fucking documentary, genius. This isn't a political issue.
You're wasting your breath. Wingnuts aren't going to let facts or science get in the way of their extreme ideology.

I won't give up until I draw my last breath.
 
AmericanHorse could be 100% correct, MaggieMae. Mebbe the History Channel produced a heavily biased piece, I dunno. The only industry I have much familiarity with is the railroads and they are unique. They own their lines, but there's so much government investment they almost seem like a public utility.

If The History Channel is now seen as biased, I'd like to know why. What's in it for them?

MaggieMae, it is possible the History Channel thought a biased piece would be more entertaining. I dunno. But it sure did not sound like American Horse was flinging bullshit. Time for further research, methinks.

 
Find me politicians (potential new lawmakers) who won't become corrupt due to corporate lobbyists running the show, and they will all have my vote. That they just SAY so becomes mere drivel in less than a year in office because they soon get swept up in the money game.

Again, this conversation is getting steered toward US vs. THEM, when this is a major, MAJOR problem that, yes, can only be solved by taxes, but one that every single American (even those living abroad, if they care at all) should start paying serious attention to as a Number One Priority. A "stimulus" package meant only to jump start a flailing economy doesn't even amount to a decent bandaid on the larger, permanent, long-term problems.

Congress and national groups examine the infrastructure needs of the United States. - Free Online Library

If every single American should care then EVERY single AMerican needs to pay Federal Income Taxes. As it is only 50% of us do that and the other 50% don't. So, don't expect us to swallow your bullshit hook line and sinker. find a way to tax those who don't pay. that'll give ya some more money to piss away.

And how much in "taxes" would someone earning $20,000 a year generate for the treasury? That argument has gotten so old (and so unsubstantiated), it's grown whiskers. How about petitioning your own legislators to fix the tax code so that Exxon-Mobil doesn't get to pay ZERO in taxes on $16 billion? I do believe their fair share alone would pick up the slack for low-income people who pay none.

depends on how many people earn 20 grand donut? but if you expect 50% of us to keep meeting your high falutin demands you may expect some push back. T axed E nough A lready.. That strike a belll?
 
Reading this thread it seems as though among other things being said Madeline is saying that anyone who gets elected into office will be a crook so she may as well keep voting in HER crook.

Isn't that what everyone does? The fact that Republicans will soon take over the House means squat, even with a few tea partiers in the mix. Nope, as far as the topic of our collapsing infrastructure, I'll be dead and gone before anyone gets serious about making it a real issue. It will take a sink hole swallowing up an entire city before that happens, or something equally catastrophic.
 
The stimulus money did not go for pay offs (mostly) but it did get used in many state and local budgets to replace falling revenues. Few actual infrastructure projects have been funded.

My ex worked for Westinghouse back in the '80s, repairing signals on railroad lines. I assume you guys know this is the preferred method of moving toxic waste, like nuclear rods? Those lines are in terrible condition.

A disaster or two is inevitable if we do not wake the fuck up.


They had the chance to put it right. It is not the taxpayers fault that they pissed our money away. You can't keep expecting the taxpayer to be a bottomless cash well for corrupt politicians. Next time, perhaps you should vote better and stop putting these bastards in office.

Find me politicians (potential new lawmakers) who won't become corrupt due to corporate lobbyists running the show, and they will all have my vote. That they just SAY so becomes mere drivel in less than a year in office because they soon get swept up in the money game.

Again, this conversation is getting steered toward US vs. THEM, when this is a major, MAJOR problem that, yes, can only be solved by taxes, but one that every single American (even those living abroad, if they care at all) should start paying serious attention to as a Number One Priority. A "stimulus" package meant only to jump start a flailing economy doesn't even amount to a decent bandaid on the larger, permanent, long-term problems.

Congress and national groups examine the infrastructure needs of the United States. - Free Online Library
American Society of Civil Engineers ) estimates that the backlog of deficient bridges alone will cost $9.4 billion a year for 20 years. The cost of repairing and maintaining roads, water facilities and the electrical grid bring the ASCE estimate of needed investment of $1.6 trillion over 5 years to restore the nation's infrastructure.

Vote out incumbents. Preferably those who run as Independents.

And, let's have term limits on these bastards. Limit the amount of time they have to become corrupt.
 
Reading this thread it seems as though among other things being said Madeline is saying that anyone who gets elected into office will be a crook so she may as well keep voting in HER crook.

Isn't that what everyone does? The fact that Republicans will soon take over the House means squat, even with a few tea partiers in the mix. Nope, as far as the topic of our collapsing infrastructure, I'll be dead and gone before anyone gets serious about making it a real issue. It will take a sink hole swallowing up an entire city before that happens, or something equally catastrophic.

That was my point. It's thinking like Madeline's that lead us here. And there are many on BOTH sides who do the same damn thing. They see it as a "the other side is completely evil" completely ignoring the evil of their own side.

And until serious campaign finance reform takes places nothing will change anyway. Anyone with a functioning brain could see that anyone who spends $30M to win a job that pays $200K a year is probably in it for ulterior motives.
 
They had the chance to put it right. It is not the taxpayers fault that they pissed our money away. You can't keep expecting the taxpayer to be a bottomless cash well for corrupt politicians. Next time, perhaps you should vote better and stop putting these bastards in office.

Find me politicians (potential new lawmakers) who won't become corrupt due to corporate lobbyists running the show, and they will all have my vote. That they just SAY so becomes mere drivel in less than a year in office because they soon get swept up in the money game.

Again, this conversation is getting steered toward US vs. THEM, when this is a major, MAJOR problem that, yes, can only be solved by taxes, but one that every single American (even those living abroad, if they care at all) should start paying serious attention to as a Number One Priority. A "stimulus" package meant only to jump start a flailing economy doesn't even amount to a decent bandaid on the larger, permanent, long-term problems.

Congress and national groups examine the infrastructure needs of the United States. - Free Online Library
American Society of Civil Engineers ) estimates that the backlog of deficient bridges alone will cost $9.4 billion a year for 20 years. The cost of repairing and maintaining roads, water facilities and the electrical grid bring the ASCE estimate of needed investment of $1.6 trillion over 5 years to restore the nation's infrastructure.

Vote out incumbents. Preferably those who run as Independents.

And, let's have term limits on these bastards. Limit the amount of time they have to become corrupt.

Let's also have some form of system outside of their control for investigating and punishing those who are corrupt. It seems beyond silly to expect foxes to investigate and punish other foxes who are eating chickens.
 
"The Crumbling of America" can be seen on The History Channel from 5PM to 7PM (edt) today.

This is a HUGE wakeup call.

America's infrastructure is collapsing. Tens of thousands of bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. A third of the nation's highways are in poor or mediocre shape. Massively leaking water and sewage systems are creating health hazards and contaminating rivers and streams. Weakened and under-maintained levees and dams tower over communities and schools. And the power grid is increasingly maxed out, disrupting millions of lives and putting entire cities in the dark. The Crumbling of America explores these problems using expert interviews, on location shooting and computer generated animation to illustrate the kinds of infrastructure disasters that could be just around the bend.
This type of assumption is inaccurate. Bridges all across the US are monintored for wear-and-tear by county highway departments under the supervision of the highway engineers. and funds are available to make repairs or perform maintenance in a timely manner. The number of bridges in a single county is much greater than the average person would believe. Bridge failures rarely are a result of maintenance failures or lack of repairs. They are usually engineering failures.

A third of the nations highways being in mediocre (average") condition is not a failure of maintenance, it is a statistical likelihood.

There is very very little leakage of potable water lines, just not out there.
Sewerage problems are presently under a system of funding that allows them to be inspected constantly and repairs to be made as problems are discovered, and local authorities apply for and get partial funding for all work. There is presently in effect a system in which cities/towns are banned from adding any new residential development until they attain those standards, which in effect limits their growth and their taxing base with they desperately need. It is a self adjusting system, of sticks and carrots. Our streams are the cleanest they've been since the expansion west.

"Weakened and under-maintained levees and dams tower over communities and schools" Not likely. Sure corruption occurs like in New Orleans where money for maintenance and improvements of levees are sidetracked by corrupt politicians who pocket the money, or use it to buy their elections, but very very few schools are built in vulnerable valley drainage systems. Why not focus on those? Punish the owners of the dams with ongoing fines, or require they be drained down to safer levels.

The power grid? why not encourage its development and improvement rather than discouraging it? No electrical utility company wants their capacity to become strained. The worse case is California, and they inhibit the growth of electrical utilities, forcing the import of their electrical power from state further east. It's a political/ governing problem first of all.

When I guess all that film and interview material with private sector engineers is all manufactured just for an entertaining piece by The History Channel. Right?

Your solution seems to be just kill all politicians. How's that worked out for ya so far? If the tea party can demand that Washington listen to their selected complaints, and be successful, then why can't they simply add our crumbling infrastructure to their list?

Because there already is a tried and tested formal process for handling infrastructure maintenance and development, and the problems we have in it come, as usual from our politicians.

Take sewers: cities/towns with sewer systems and treatment plants get their revenue for maintenance and upgrades from the customer base. They also get moneys from tap-on fees. They do not have to accumulate enough money to upgrade, they can leverage enough money to make those with a much smaller amount. But the EPA and state departments of environmental management properly get involved and force they when upgrading to do things they might not want to take the time of resources to do. It may mean abandoning an old plant and going further downstream an build a new one there. but this means building a larger intercepting main line than they ordinarily would think needed, and they just want to get on with it so they can encourage growth and property tax base again. This is a good process, and means all levels of government are involved.

But there are times and places where the local government officials can move the money that would be used to leverage the needed work to pet projects, and they let their plant deterioriate. Again they are forced to pay attention because their constitutents suffer from lack of growth and development, and new jobs fail to materialize for their children as they graduate from high school or college.

The process is self adjusting and regulating if left alone. It has developed over the past 150 years, and works well when not short circuited.

I happen to live between two incorporated population centers. The larger one sees the revenues from sewage treatment as a boondoggle to expand other unrelated city sponsored services; an ice skating arena, a new park, buying a piece of real-estate for some future government expansion of unknown purpose, or some other scheme that would be better left to private enterprise, or at least put off until the budget permits; though I doubt that land speculation has a place in city government...ever. But when these diversions take place the budget soars, and property taxes become unbearable to many. Then the citizens rise up, a new governing body moves in and undoes the harm if the harm hasn't been too great. This is self regulating.

The smaller incorporated population center resolved its sewage plant problems by a process of study, and application, and leveraged financing from the FHA, and has move on. They operate with targetted taxes and revenues from the public they serve. That's because the process is so close to the citizens, and they have an need and an opportunity to be involved, attend meetings, serve on commissions to resolve the deficiencies; the American way.

When the government sends vast sums of moneys out to the precincts it short circuits this regulating system, and sets up an expectation for the same in the future.

The engineers who are involved in this study: I wonder how gainfully employed their businesses are in the work they see as needing to be done. Why not offer their services to any number of local authorities which they identify as those being in need? If the situation is dangerous, or at a tipping point there are plenty of ways to move these critical projects into actualization, and the financing process is there without their usurping it. They seem to be politically motivated in this expose. I don't want to kill any politicians at all; I'd just like them to find another way to seek prominence. This type of movement, if it took hold, would waste vast sums of money, and interupt the process.
 
Last edited:
Reading this thread it seems as though among other things being said Madeline is saying that anyone who gets elected into office will be a crook so she may as well keep voting in HER crook.

Isn't that what everyone does? The fact that Republicans will soon take over the House means squat, even with a few tea partiers in the mix. Nope, as far as the topic of our collapsing infrastructure, I'll be dead and gone before anyone gets serious about making it a real issue. It will take a sink hole swallowing up an entire city before that happens, or something equally catastrophic.

I feel the same way about national security and the borders, when a million or more are dead somebody will pay attention and stop calling us bigots, racists, and xenophobes.
 
What would Vegas and southern CA do without that WPA Project Hoover Dam?

What would we do if say an earthquake destroyed Hoover Dam?

Many in the USA live on the edge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top