- Thread starter
- #21
....simply see what they claim the other side is guilty of.
Every 'fake news' outlet under their control....meaning just about all of 'em.....are banging the drum about the need for hearings to find evidence of pro-Russia quid pro quo from Trump for helping him win the election.
Never mind that there is no such evidence.
Not a smidgen!
But....it is useful to go over clear and evident facts....
1. Trump has a cabinet that has made tougher statements on Russia than anything Obama did.
If Trump were going to be submissive to Putin, how to explain Dan Coates as Trump's pick for Director of National Intelligence:
Coates was forbidden to go to Russia by Putin for comparing him to Hitler:
"people from the US had been similarly blacklisted, including ... and Dan Coats of Indiana, a former US ambassador to Germany. “While I’m disappointed that I won’t be able to go on vacation with my family in Siberia this summer,” Coats wisecracked, “I am honored to be on this list.”Chrystia Freeland: My Ukraine, and Putin’s big lie
2. A pro-Russia policy would include slashing defense spending...as Obama did.
3 . A pro-Russia policy would include slowing our nuclear weapon modernization....as Obama did.
4. A pro-Russia policy would include rolling back missile defense systems...as Obama did.
5. A pro-Russia policy would include entering a one-sided nuclear arms agreement....as Obama did.
6. A pro-Russia policy would include doing everything you could to stop oil and gas production...as Obama did.
7. A pro-Russia policy would include promising Putin that you'd be more 'flexible' in dealing with Russia...as Obama did.
8. A pro-Russia policy would include turning over 20% of our uranium to Russia in exchange for a $145 million donation to the Clinton Foundation....as Bill's wife did. [FAKE NEWS: CNBC Cites Left-Wing Politifact in Clinton Russian Uranium Story - Breitbart]
9. Assuming, arguendo, that leaking material about the Democrats and their candidate were aimed at influencing the electorate, list those things that the electorate knew from the 'leaks' that they didn't know before.
Who didn't know that Bill's wife was a congenital liar and career criminal????
10. And, those leaks themselves???
“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.
That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?
No evidence that you accept, but you were also convinced that there were death panels, FEMA prisons, the military was attacking Texas, Walmart had tunnels to be used to transport Texas prisoners, the census was somehow a plot to enslave us, the president was a Muslim, The president was born in Kenya, Sharia law was being implemented to the exclusion of our laws, millions of illegal Mexicans voted in our election and a host of other crazy things. Your history concerning evidence has been pretty screwed up.
As I said.....
Every 'fake news' outlet under their control....meaning just about all of 'em.....are banging the drum about the need for hearings to find evidence of pro-Russia quid pro quo from Trump for helping him win the election.
Never mind that there is no such evidence.
Not a smidgen!
Yet, some fool....you, wrote "No evidence that you accept,...."
I scoured your post for examples of proof.....and there was as much of same as there is that you have an IQ approaching triple digits.
Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?
I'm sure Trump and his supporters like you do feel cornered about now. Get used to it. The truth will tear him to shreds.
Gee....you sure are in a hurry to change the subject.
Could this be the reason?
As I said.....
Every 'fake news' outlet under their control....meaning just about all of 'em.....are banging the drum about the need for hearings to find evidence of pro-Russia quid pro quo from Trump for helping him win the election.
Never mind that there is no such evidence.
Not a smidgen!
Yet, some fool....you, wrote "No evidence that you accept,...."
I scoured your post for examples of proof.....and there was as much of same as there is that you have an IQ approaching triple digits.
Aren't you used to being exposed as a fool yet?
Amusing that someone from the right wing, the home of Death panels, FEMA prisons, Jade Helm, Walmart tunnels, the so called "FAKE" birth certificate, claims that Obama was Muslim, Michelle is a man, non ending Benghazi investigations, Breitbart, Alex Jones, Glenn Beck, That whiny little guy, the war on Christmas, and countless other crazy claims , would have the nerve to bring up fake news.
Like I've said before, believe what you want. I'm not qualified to reacquaint you with reality, so I see no need to try.
Ohhh.....so sorry, you dunce, but I won't allow you to run off with your tail between your legs.
Let's stick to the subject that you regret getting into.....
Gee....you sure are in a hurry to change the subject.
Could this be the reason?
As I said.....
Every 'fake news' outlet under their control....meaning just about all of 'em.....are banging the drum about the need for hearings to find evidence of pro-Russia quid pro quo from Trump for helping him win the election.
Never mind that there is no such evidence.
Not a smidgen!
Yet, some fool....you, wrote "No evidence that you accept,...."
I scoured your post for examples of proof.....and there was as much of same as there is that you have an IQ approaching triple digits.
Aren't you used to being exposed as a fool yet?