MikeK
Gold Member
If you're tired of corporate-driven and regulated mainstream news channels and you'd like to look deeper into what's happening in your world, go here: On air ? RT
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A quick glance might not be enough.What does it mean to say that mainstream news channels are "corporate driven and regulated"? Has all integrity in journalism really gone down the drain?
What disturbs me most about journalists I know is when they allow their personal bias to influence a story.
I took a quick glance at your link and don't see how that news source is necessarily less biased than any other.
If you're tired of corporate-driven and regulated mainstream news channels and you'd like to look deeper into what's happening in your world, go here: On air ? RT
I'm watching the re-broadcast of that Monsanto coverage. What I've seen is objective reporting. If it seems biased to you it's because you might be uncomfortable with the facts, such as the fact that Monsanto is clearly attempting to monopolize on Nature by capturing the agricultural market via the creation of Genetically Modifed seeds which are available only from them. And how do you feel about the fact that laboratory rats which were fed exclusively GM seeds and foods all have developed malignant tumors?I don't know. Seems pretty biased to me. For example just now they were talking about Monsanto. And the reporters were obviously very anti-Monsanto.
I'm watching the re-broadcast of that Monsanto coverage. What I've seen is objective reporting. If it seems biased to you it's because you might be uncomfortable with the facts, such as the fact that Monsanto is clearly attempting to monopolize on Nature by capturing the agricultural market via the creation of Genetically Modifed seeds which are available only from them. And how do you feel about the fact that laboratory rats which were fed exclusively GM seeds and foods all have developed malignant tumors?I don't know. Seems pretty biased to me. For example just now they were talking about Monsanto. And the reporters were obviously very anti-Monsanto.
How often do you see this kind of in-depth and repeated coverage on Fox, or CNN, or MSNBC?
The truth isn't bias. Facts are facts -- not bias.
If you're tired of corporate-driven and regulated mainstream news channels and you'd like to look deeper into what's happening in your world, go here: On air ? RT
A quick glance might not be enough.What does it mean to say that mainstream news channels are "corporate driven and regulated"? Has all integrity in journalism really gone down the drain?
What disturbs me most about journalists I know is when they allow their personal bias to influence a story.
I took a quick glance at your link and don't see how that news source is necessarily less biased than any other.
And to answer your question; the constant commercials that punctuate mainstream news broadcasts are the corporate drivers. You will see and hear and see news items on RT which are not presented on mainstream channels. RT is commercial-free.
Try tuning in at different times of the day.
I'm watching the re-broadcast of that Monsanto coverage. What I've seen is objective reporting. If it seems biased to you it's because you might be uncomfortable with the facts, such as the fact that Monsanto is clearly attempting to monopolize on Nature by capturing the agricultural market via the creation of Genetically Modifed seeds which are available only from them. And how do you feel about the fact that laboratory rats which were fed exclusively GM seeds and foods all have developed malignant tumors?I don't know. Seems pretty biased to me. For example just now they were talking about Monsanto. And the reporters were obviously very anti-Monsanto.
How often do you see this kind of in-depth and repeated coverage on Fox, or CNN, or MSNBC?
The truth isn't bias. Facts are facts -- not bias.