Times Square swarmed by hundreds protesting COVID vaccine mandate, chanting 'F--- Joe Biden'

Sounds like a major spreading event. Well, if it proves fatal for a lot of participants, the nation is better off for their absence.

With NYC packed so crowed, they've already created herd immunity within their city group.
 
Marriage licenses didn't become statutory in England until 1753.

Just because there's a marriage license, doesn't mean it wasn't a legal thing before.

In the past, if you hadn't got married and you had a child, that child would have problems, the woman would have problems too, potentially being ostracized from society.
 
Is that a no then?

I notice a lack of any actual positions or any references to posts I have made. Care to try again?


When you have facts to go with those positions perhaps we can debate.
 
There were protests during the spanish flu against measures to keep the virus at bay. We live in america and we need to have freedom for those who are pro pandemic. Thank god for DeSantis and Abbott who are both pro pandemic. #ventilatorsovervaccines #sicknessoverhealth
 
frame_01_delay-0.05s.gif

 
Prior t
Just because there's a marriage license, doesn't mean it wasn't a legal thing before.

In the past, if you hadn't got married and you had a child, that child would have problems, the woman would have problems too, potentially being ostracized from society.
Prior to 1753 unlicensed, legal marriages took place all the time. It wasn't until the mid 19th Century that state marriage license laws started popping up. Some state
 
Prior t

Prior to 1753 unlicensed, legal marriages took place all the time. It wasn't until the mid 19th Century that state marriage license laws started popping up. Some state

That might be so, but that doesn't mean that marriage didn't have anything to do with the government.

Marriage has certainly changed over the years, but you're argument is that it's changed, so clearly the government had nothing to do with marriage before this. Simply not true and not good logic.
 
That might be so, but that doesn't mean that marriage didn't have anything to do with the government.

Marriage has certainly changed over the years, but you're argument is that it's changed, so clearly the government had nothing to do with marriage before this. Simply not true and not good logic.
It was a religious thing long before the government got involved. The government should get out of the marriage business. It has no place telling people who can and can't get married.
 
It was a religious thing long before the government got involved. The government should get out of the marriage business. It has no place telling people who can and can't get married.

Again, government and religion were one and the same.

The Pope is head of a country AND head of a religion. So is the Queen of England.

Why? Because that's how it was.
 
Again, government and religion were one and the same.

The Pope is head of a country AND head of a religion. So is the Queen of England.

Why? Because that's how it was.
And it was Parliament that passed the first marriage license law, not the Church of England, nor the monarch of the time.
 

Times Square swarmed by hundreds protesting COVID vaccine mandate, chanting

'F--- Joe Biden'

The event was part of the 'World Wide Rally For Freedom'

18 Sep 2021 ~~ By Andrew Mark Miller
Hundreds of protesters took to the streets in New York City’s Times Square Saturday to protest coronavirus vaccine mandate requirements.
Protesters could be seen waving flags and signs on Saturday with many of them chanting against mandatory vaccines.
COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATED IN NEW YORK: HERE'S WHAT RESIDENTS ARE SAYING

Protesters could be heard chanting "freedom" and "my body my choice."

At one point a woman got on a stage and told Biden that she has lost her patience with him prompting chants of "F--- Joe Biden" from the crowd.

The event was part of the "World Wide Rally For Freedom" which took place in cities across the globe including in Australia where protesters clashed with police in videos posted to social media.

"We will push back against widespread propaganda, by producing our own media, and advancing our own narrative, instead of succumbing to the one being pushed on us. We will not accept the rampant politicization of science and medicine, and we will return these institutions to being neutral sources of information for the benefit of society, over government and corporate interests," a press release about Saturday’s event reed on the organizers' website.
Earlier this summer, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio enacted a policy mandating that New Yorkers who wished to visit bars, restaurants, gyms, and other local businesses have to show proof of being vaccinated against the coronavirus.


~~~~~~
Can't be... There are no Conservatives in New York City.. It's supposed to be about 90% Democrats, so one can assume that a majority of these protestors are not conservatives. So much for the liberal theory that it’s the Republicans and only the Republicans that are against the vaccine and mask mandates. As I’ve said all along, a majority of the opposition to the vaccine and mask mandates is not a political issue, it’s more of a personal issue. I bet there are as many Democrats against these things as there are Republicans.
Meanwhile these are the same people that supposedly elected Joey Xi Bai Dung....:laugh2:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, didn't see this on the 6:30 news.
 
Great, more trump Nazi stupidity, creating a super-spreader event that will soon swamp emergency rooms with unvaccinated trump Nazis that contracted, and then shared COVID.


.
Another one unaware that New York City is not a Republican hotbed.
 
And parliament worked for WHO? Oh yeah, the monarch.
Is that the case?

Parliament, afaik, has always been in opposition to the crown even if originally the crown retained absolute authority. The Parliament was always the representation or the directly comprised of the nobility, not the king.

Not that it really matters in the context of the point you were refuting. I am not sure why it would actually matter, marriage as a historical state institution is simply obvious. I find it rather ironic that most claiming the religious roots of marriage ignore that for the vast majority of history marriage was a political tool more than anything. It was for uniting disparate tribes and/or families.
 

Forum List

Back
Top