Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They are like the people ripped off by Bernie Maddoff. Only Bernie Maddoffs victims had legal recourse against him.I think we're stuck with him until the next general election. Word is voters in his district have no intention of re-electing him.
If being a despicable person was criteria for expulsion of Congress, there would be a lot fewer people in Congress.This is where congress needs to put it's foot down and not stand for someone who essentially lies and cheats his way into congress.
We're not tlaking normal campaign hyperbole, but a complete fabrication of who he is.
I hope his district reelects him. Just like the "squad's" idiots just keep reelecting these DemocratsThey are like the people ripped off by Bernie Maddoff. Only Bernie Maddoffs victims had legal recourse against him.
Santos would serve as a very bad lesson. That if you can lie your way into congress, no number of lies can reach the expulsion threshold.
That's true. There is no state or federal law that denies the people the right to elect a serial liar or any other kind of scumbag to either the House or the Senate or the Presidency for that matter.They are like the people ripped off by Bernie Maddoff. Only Bernie Maddoffs victims had legal recourse against him.
Santos would serve as a very bad lesson. That if you can lie your way into congress, no number of lies can reach the expulsion threshold.
I am 100% for this as soon as Biden resigns amid the avalanche of equal lies about his past, multiple degrees he doesn't have, finishing in the top of his class that he didn't, being involved in civil rights that he wasn't etc. etc. etc. etc.
As well as committing plagiarism multiple times throughout his entire career.
As well as his shocking bald face lies when he was debating Sanders that is on record and on video
I get it, I get it. But we should want to get rid of Santos because he his hurting the GOP.Yeah? Well we have a long....long.....long list of democrats to expel first......democrats who are anti-semites, racists, sleeping with chinese spies, using chinese spies as their drivers..........
Let's start this......
Ilhan omar,
AOC
Swallwell
Schiff
pelosi
Schumer........
That is a different argument, and it has some merit. Only quoting that post, but I read your others along the same line, and they make sense.That's true. There is no state or federal law that denies the people the right to elect a serial liar or any other kind of scumbag to either the House or the Senate or the Presidency for that matter.
Which of course is why there are so many of those in Congress now.
Why? Because he was a teenage drag queen? Give me a break. That Democrat accept serial liars is a given. My point in this thread is that the GOP need not do the same.George Santos wouldn't have been allowed to run as a Democrat.
What do you mean, "would?" Trump is still around, is he embracing Santos?And Trump, another serial liar and conman would embrace this liar.
The thing is, unless a constitutional amendment is passed, the GOP has no say over who the people in a district elect. A political party cannot say who can and cannot run on their ticket. They can withhold campaign funds, refuse to endorse, even speak out against a candidate, but they cannot reject who the people choose to elect.I get it, I get it. But we should want to get rid of Santos because he his hurting the GOP.
If we say we won't get rid of him because Biden, how are we any different from the perpetual "But, TRUUUUUUMP," crowd, who are the children of the "Buh, buh, buh, but BUUUUUUSH" crowd?
That is a different argument, and it has some merit. Only quoting that post, but I read your others along the same line, and they make sense.
Why? Because he was a teenage drag queen? Give me a break. That Democrat accept serial liars is a given. My point in this thread is that the GOP need not do the same.
What do you mean, "would?" Trump is still around, is he embracing Santos?
Yes, nor should they. Voter control of the nominations is important.The thing is, unless a constitutional amendment is passed, the GOP has no say over who the people in a district elect. A political party cannot say who can and cannot run on their ticket. They can withhold campaign funds, refuse to endorse, even speak out against a candidate, but they cannot reject who the people choose to elect.
And it also explains why some really bad eggs register as Democrat or Republican or whatever. A political party has no say in who can or cannot register as a member of that party.
That's true. The old guard GOP sure didn't want Donald Trump. And they hated it when he embarrassed them by doing what they all promised but never had the courage to do--move our embassy to Jerusalem for one example--and when he accomplished what they had never been able to do or said couldn't be done. The Democrats hated him just because and if he had been 100% a saint and impeccable in manner and methods they would have trashed him just as much because he wasn't one of them.Yes, nor should they. Voter control of the nominations is important.
That's how we got Donald Trump. He would have never been nominated if The Party had to approve him and not the voters.
True, but they elected him under false pretensesShould this not be left to the citizens of his district?
They elected him.
The republicans razor thin majority means they can't afford to flip the Santos seat democrat.True, but they elected him under false pretenses
I hope the republicans give him the boot
They won't. This is why Independents are double size of either party.True, but they elected him under false pretenses
I hope the republicans give him the boot
He's a perfect poster child for the GOP.
House Democrats Push To Expel Santos From Congress
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) chastised Santos for appearing at the State of the Union on Tuesday.www.forbes.com
Five House Democrats introduced a resolution on Thursday to expel Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) from Congress, calling him a “serial fraudster” amid growing revelations that Santos has lied about nearly every aspect of his résumé, leading to bipartisan calls for his resignation.
Look at this moron:
View attachment 755852
He has no business anywhere near the GOP.
The GOP should have beaten the Dems to the punch by a mile. I don't care that Dems would embrace this cross-dressing, check-bouncing, lying weasel, if he were one of them. That's them Dems. If the GOP wants to position itself as the party of honesty, they need to get rid of this guy, yesterday.
What possible defense is there? When Mitt Romney attacks you and he's right, that's about as wrong as a Republican can be. He's obviously faking being a Republican with his AR15 lapel pin, his draq queen past, and his pushing to the front to shake hands with Biden and the dignitaries. He's gotten well over fifteen minutes of fame with his elaborate prank. Let him retire now and write his book.
GOP needs to cut its losses. It may be time for Trump to step up and take charge. He is the presumptive front-runner and only declared candidate for 2024, so he is the leader.
There is no one who even approaches Santos's lies, dipshit.Sure, but first all the Dem LIARS must resign.
Good point, but on a slim majority, especially today, i think they would be more apt to try and keep them.Hard to say
Look how they got rid of Al Franken on a lot less
Coming from the other side of he aisle with the likes of Schiff and others that is funny.Santos is a Cancer on his party
They refuse to cure their cancer
See, I disagree. I think his falsifying everything about him IS grounds for expulsion, but I also see that the repubs have a very slim majority and keeping that will be crucial, so, they may censure him, but I don’t know if they are going to give up that vote.I agree
His lies, as egregious as they are, are not grounds for expulsion
But not just what he does after election but how he raised his campaign funds, how he spent them on personal expenses and how he fabricated his campaign finances are grounds for expulsion
I get it, I get it. But we should want to get rid of Santos because he his hurting the GOP.
If we say we won't get rid of him because Biden, how are we any different from the perpetual "But, TRUUUUUUMP," crowd, who are the children of the "Buh, buh, buh, but BUUUUUUSH" crowd?
That is a different argument, and it has some merit. Only quoting that post, but I read your others along the same line, and they make sense.
Why? Because he was a teenage drag queen? Give me a break. That Democrat accept serial liars is a given. My point in this thread is that the GOP need not do the same.
What do you mean, "would?" Trump is still around, is he embracing Santos?
Good point, but on a slim majority, especially today, i think they would be more apt to try and keep them.
