Bleipriester
Freedom!
They are currently making good contracts with a number of countries.The government hardly ever runs businesses right.
See: Pemex or Petróleos de Venezuela, PDVSA
Both are fail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are currently making good contracts with a number of countries.The government hardly ever runs businesses right.
See: Pemex or Petróleos de Venezuela, PDVSA
Both are fail.
It cannot be real times of War under Any form of Capitalism, if our federal Congress cannot justify Tax Rates, meet for the exigency.It's impossible not to laugh at left-wing hatriots. Here is their official platform:The reality is, there are no wartime tax rates and our commander in chief, believes we can lower our tax burden.
- We must decrease the defense budget. It is bloated and unnecessary!
You can always count on the left to contradict their own positions in a single breath. These people cannot figure out which way is up or what they believe.
- We must increase taxes for defense - we are in a war!
it is all the national socialist right wing, has to work with, besides just fantasy.Yes folks.... danielpalos really did just quote the Nazi's.Everybody knows, real times of war require real times of war tax rates.
In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
View attachment 118265
Once again - tax rates do not dictate war time status. In addition to that reality, our Confress is fully empowered to set whatever tax rates they would like.It cannot be real times of War under Any form of Capitalism, if our federal Congress cannot justify Tax Rates, meet for the exigency.
As long as defense is fully funded (and it is) your argument is irrational and idiotic.If we can lower tax rates, then there is no national security problem sufficient to deny or disparage our Individual Liberty.
No, they don't. Congress has an obligation to pay the Debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.Once again - tax rates do not dictate war time status. In addition to that reality, our Confress is fully empowered to set whatever tax rates they would like.It cannot be real times of War under Any form of Capitalism, if our federal Congress cannot justify Tax Rates, meet for the exigency.
As long as defense is fully funded (and it is) your argument is irrational and idiotic.If we can lower tax rates, then there is no national security problem sufficient to deny or disparage our Individual Liberty.
I am not talking about a bakery. Since the big food companies are private, who else can be responsible for the food crisis?Tell us then how the "big food companies" are "private" when the government is controlling every facet of their operations - right down to what type of breads they can make.Tell us then how it is socialism when the big food companies are private.
I've got news for you snowflake - there can be no government infringement to individual liberty, period. Whether there is a "fiscal exigency" or not. Whether we are at war or not. The fact that you believe there can be is why you are so woefully unqualified to be discussing any of this.There can be no government Infringement to Individual Liberty, if there is no fiscal exigency requiring it.
No they don't. Neither one of those are one of their 18 enumerated powers. Here is Thomas Jefferson explaining it to left-wing nitwits looking for ways to grant the federal government unlimited powers:Congress has an obligation to...provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.
Uh...the government which collapsed their nation with socialism. The dictator who created limited resources with a failed left-wing ideology (one that he himself does not adhere to while living in tremendous wealth). What do you think - the "big food companies" all banned together and decided to devastate their own bottom line by throwing out all of the food supply?!?I am not talking about a bakery. Since the big food companies are private, who else can be responsible for the food crisis?Tell us then how the "big food companies" are "private" when the government is controlling every facet of their operations - right down to what type of breads they can make.Tell us then how it is socialism when the big food companies are private.
What socialism? The food companies are PRIVATE. Do you know what that means? Private? And stop bothering me with your ideology pigeonhole thinking.Uh...the government which collapsed their nation with socialism. The dictator who created limited resources with a failed left-wing ideology (one that he himself does not adhere to while living in tremendous wealth). What do you think - the "big food companies" all banned together and decided to devastate their own bottom line by throwing out all of the food supply?!?I am not talking about a bakery. Since the big food companies are private, who else can be responsible for the food crisis?Tell us then how the "big food companies" are "private" when the government is controlling every facet of their operations - right down to what type of breads they can make.Tell us then how it is socialism when the big food companies are private.
You can't defend your precious little liberal ideology. It is a failed ideology. It ends in poverty and misery every time.
Snowflake....they are NOT "private". Private means the freedom to do as you wish. The government controls every aspect of their lives (as illustrated by them telling bakeries what type of breads they can bake - you moron). Venezuela is a socialist nation you dimwit. Here - let me know when you finally get it and are embarrassed by your idiotic comments:What socialism? The food companies are PRIVATE. Do you know what that means? Private?